Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

ColonelPete

Players
  • Content Сount

    38,559
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    19178
  • Clan

    [-SBG-]

Everything posted by ColonelPete

  1. Around 3% WR difference with 3 missing stats. That could mean anything.
  2. ColonelPete

    Matchmaking in der Kritik

    Das ist das normale MM. 3 Schiffe -2 Tier ist das Minimum für +2 MM.
  3. ColonelPete

    World of Warships hacker could face 5 years in jail

    Sure. I guess you did not show the replay back then.
  4. ColonelPete

    Unspotting cheating, does it exist?

    I know what he wrote. We have enough people on these forum reporting on changes and things "that never worked that way before", but are features since 2015.
  5. ColonelPete

    Unspotting cheating, does it exist?

    That is not new. That is how it works at least since 2015.
  6. ColonelPete

    Unspotting cheating, does it exist?

    There is no such cheat. And if you gave us a screenshot or replay we could explain you what happened.
  7. ColonelPete

    World of Warships hacker could face 5 years in jail

    Which is a completly different matter. And even if WG agreed, they do not need to tell you.
  8. ColonelPete

    World of Warships hacker could face 5 years in jail

    Apart from the fact that they never denied that. "Aim Bots" or better "aiming help" do not require a hack of the WoWs server. They run on the players computer and work worse than the aim of a good player. The asia server regularly posts numbers of people getting banned using forbidden mods and bots. https://forum.worldofwarships.asia/topic/41475-bot-and-mod-account-sanction-report/
  9. ColonelPete

    World of Warships hacker could face 5 years in jail

    The arcticle is not well researched. As if 100% accuracy were possible.
  10. ColonelPete

    Matchmaking

    That is why that was an answer to your theory and not for the OP...
  11. ColonelPete

    Matchmaking

    Unfortunately that is not the case, as you have these players on both teams. Skill is to get the victory back after a teammate basicly handed it to the enemy.
  12. When you need to play all day, you must be doing something wrong.
  13. ColonelPete

    Hmm......Maplesyrup is down?

    It is still a private site. And wows numbers works too.
  14. ColonelPete

    Hmm......Maplesyrup is down?

    It is probably lack of interest. The site involved manual work. And if he stopped playing himself, why should he continue?
  15. ColonelPete

    Hmm......Maplesyrup is down?

    No. The API gives data that WG is willing to share. Other sites still work. See proships.
  16. ColonelPete

    Hmm......Maplesyrup is down?

    And no.... That was never the strengh of maplesyrup. For that we have a site that logs login numbers on the servers.
  17. ColonelPete

    Quality of life improvements patch in WOWs 

    That is a rather short sighted view and would not explain the QoL improvements WoWs saw over the years.
  18. ColonelPete

    2 month notice.

    And? Where is what you speak of? They just explain how they do it.
  19. ColonelPete

    2 month notice.

    No idea what videos you watch. I know of no such video.
  20. ColonelPete

    Matchmaking

    There is your explanation. WG cannot fix that, but you can.
  21. ColonelPete

    Warning for unsporting conduct

    The Karma system has nothing to with toxic play.
  22. ColonelPete

    Warning for unsporting conduct

    People downvote other people for their name or even before they see them playing. That is hardly a criterium for toxic play. One could even argue that people reporting others for no valid reason are toxic.
  23. ColonelPete

    Warning for unsporting conduct

    Passive play is player dependent, not ship dependent. You can play passivly/poorly and survive till the end in BB, CA and DD too. While that might not be great teamwork, I would not call it toxic. Toxic is sitting in a corner doing nothing or even sabotage your own team. That has nothing to do with ships, but 100% with the player.
  24. ColonelPete

    Warning for unsporting conduct

    The way I stated it was in two separate sentences, which where also visually separated, by a blank line, making it obvious that both sentences stood for themselves. My frist sentence was an OBVIOUS counter to your claim that " One can't be spotted, the other can play without danger of being sunk", which is just wrong. Therefore my conclusion was that YOU consider gameplay to be toxic that you do not like, since I could not see any other reasoning of yours that applied only to CV and Subs.
×