ColonelPete

I did not say that either.... I said they rank out faster than bad players, which you confirmed, multiple times... a) since the whole setup was changed and you have to go through qualification for each league change, the time might have increased slightly b) as I said, good players take less time c) when they need less time, that is because they need less battles... d) cannot say and did not argue that e) cannot say and did not argue that

I did not argue anything you did not confirm. Wake up!

That is the problem. The one misunderstanding stuff is obviously you... You are the one starting a multiple post discussion about a sentence you agree to....

As I told you already, I did not. You continue to argue points I did not make

I did not argue that... You have tendency to argue points with me that I did not make...

No, you are just confirming what I wrote. I am just surprised why you are so argumentative about it. You also said that bad players need longer and good players are quicker to advance, which is exactly what I said.

Nobody and I did not say that. I said that the bad players need longer and you confirmed that multiple times now. Where exactly is your argument? Since you confirmed what I said, it does not look like you do not need much Ranked experience to know how this works. That is why I am always astounded when veterans are surprised how it works. And I never said you need a lot of battles in Ranked. You have the tendency to make stuff up. How come?

Nice stats, but the question remains why you want to risk the gameplay for all to introduce a class that is not very popular and you do not expect to be popular?

But that is exactly what I said... "I am pretty sure that skilled players rank out faster than bad players..." So unless you needed 150+ battles too, why would you deny that?

So you needed as many battles as the bad players to get to the qualifications? Doubtful.

It does not work that way.

Wann war das?

As this thread has shown, too many players cannot read the MMM, which makes it a dangerous tool.

Random SC:

Then assign a different button there. The standard is G, but you somehow changed that.

When you do not answer my question then I would hardly call that an argument. I just contradicted your theory that WG does not bring QoL improvements, which they did.

Is this more obvious for you?

And that is why they were included in the game, because they were useful. That is what QoL improvements are. And now think about why WG included them, if they do not bring money, as you claimed.

Are you for real? Smoke boundaries Smoke Counter Last position on minimap Damage Counter More filter options for the carousel in port ...

Ranked has always been Random with less players.

You were speaking about ship WR. So having someone with 100% WR after 1 battle is bad? How do you want to know? The numbers mean nothing.

That is still the case. Unless you think that you get such teams every time and the enemy not... Only when one thinks that ship WR after one battle has meaning...

And? Either these people do not do what you think they are doing or they got different sanctions than you expected. Btw. publishing numbers does not fall under the shaming rule.

I am pretty sure that skilled players rank out faster than bad players...

How is that a problem. Should make it easier for you.