ColonelPete

Rechne nicht damit.

Auch mit einem CV. Schau Dir mal die Gefechte von guten Spielern an.

Wie gesagt, gute Spieler schaffen die Situationen.

Und das machen gute Spieler. Deutsche CV sind halt schwieriger zu spielen

Burning sections cannot burn again...

2015...

And you believe you know what other people think, how presumptuous...

You talked about a battle result... You did not say you followed other players ranked battle career... Maybe you want to change your post then...

You still do not get that this is not a about single battles...

And you still do not get that I never argued that point. Maybe you should calm down a bit, you seem to get emotional. The one spamming this thread with posts is obviously you. It is quite surprising when a forum veteran regularly needs two posts to gather his throughts, as if there were no edit function... Let me guess, you want to supply the vacuum with your words

You cared a bit more about it yesterday, but since you already said this: You already confirmed that bad players need more battles than good players in the current system. Good players win more and therefore move up faster than bad players. So my statement that bad players need more battles is still valid. As you confirmed here: I have no idea why you still deny that statement after telling it so many times yourself...

And an non-answer, how obvious. The reality is that 40% players advance slower than an Super-Unicum. You denied that.

It obviously is not, since you made the same statement. Do you really think that a 40% player will advance as quickly as a Super Unicum with years of Ranked experience? Yes or No?

I do not have to do anything. You made the same statement, but you disagreed to mine. If you want to add something, fine, but do not disagree on something you state yourself, just because some other person said it.

I did not argue changes in relative speed. I just said: "I am pretty sure that skilled players rank out faster than bad players...", you disagreed, while later confirming the same thing. See above.

Nope. You are still of that opinion.

Apart from you contradicting a theory you supported later. It is just a bit strange.

Nope.

Sure? It is just the post that started this exchange...

There is a difference between needing and wanting something.

That is a question... For some reason you denied my theorie that good players advance more quickly (only to state that theory yourself later) and I asked you why would you deny that theory. Your denial would only make sense, if a good player needed as much battles as a bad player. That is what the "unless" is for.

I am not in the business of speculation or make believe as some other people. If he wants help, he will ask. That is why I made the suggestion.

And for some reason you completly ignored the word "doubtful"... I did not denounce anyone. I asked a question. And I said NOTHING about the number of players or your stats.... It is all in your head.

And? What has this to do with this topic?

Nice bait. But I am not in the business of providing strangers on the internet with my personal information, especially when they make stuff up about me... It would also be a bit offtopic and we do not want that, do we? Another invention of yours, I did not say anything against that...