-
Content Сount
38,559 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
19178 -
Clan
[-SBG-]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by ColonelPete
-
Was the 50% discount not enough we had a few days ago?
-
While it is commendable to play the objective, I do not think this is the best play every time. It all depends on your spawn postion. When you spawn in the middle, it is your job to block the rings, unless you come up with a different task with your team. A CV is rarely a good ship for blocking a ring early in the game. The outside spawns should not go for the rings, unless the middle spawns do not do their jobs. No matter how many ships you put in the rings, as long as the enemy blocks them, you cannot cap. But it is far easier to shoot up an enemy team in crossfire, when you flank that enemy. An enemy that leaves the flanks uncontested, usually loses by ship count.
-
Why does the WG not take player statistics into account?
ColonelPete replied to xKrisgard's topic in General Discussion
But still players complain about these teams... This thread: less than 4%-points And these are all teams with players with hidden stats, so we do not really know how balanced or unbalanced the teams really are. -
Then deactivate the mod and try to see them again...
-
And then you played Epicenter... And I wonder how your teammates react when you play football, drop the ball on purpose, and then leave after five minutes to play rugby.
-
Without the mod, you cannot see that.
-
Why does the WG not take player statistics into account?
ColonelPete replied to xKrisgard's topic in General Discussion
You are hilarious Why are your recent stats not above 65% or at least 55% then? According to you it should be easy to play on that level. Hint: Your last 2000 battles were just 0.3% points better than your average... That you improved over time.... Sealclubbing in a division on Tier I does not count... -
Mit Sekundaerfocus. Alles andere macht keinen Sinn.
-
Do you think the game is dying and will be shut down soon?
ColonelPete replied to Cirno9999's topic in General Discussion
That is obvious, as fun is subjective. Some people have fun spending a fortune on new ships and look at them in port. -
they have no clue how to play they have a clue how to play and knew it was not the right time to push
- 39 replies
-
- 14
-
-
-
Ja, Siegraten auf Basis von wenigen Gefechten sind schon fürcherlich aussagekräftig...
-
Do you think the game is dying and will be shut down soon?
ColonelPete replied to Cirno9999's topic in General Discussion
Poor BB... Ranked Stats, Relative damage done -
matchmaker Matchmaking in der Kritik
ColonelPete replied to Frighty1975's topic in Allgemeine Diskussionen
Nein. 1.4k ist nicht neu. Rechne mal hoch wieviel Stunden Spielzeit das sind. Und fuer 7k brauchen viele mehrere Jahre. Wenn das kein Veteran ist, wann dann? Und um die 10er zu bekommen hast Du 9er und 8er gespielt und kommst quasi in dieselben Gefechte. Sieht man ja auf dem Screenshot -
matchmaker Matchmaking in der Kritik
ColonelPete replied to Frighty1975's topic in Allgemeine Diskussionen
Sind nur keine neuen Spieler.... -
Die fuer 1500 haben nur 10 Punkte. Ob einen das Extra das Geld wert ist... Mich stoert eher die zivile Erscheinung des Kapitaens.
-
Anzeige im Hud: eigene Verborgenheit. Spiel-Einstellung oder Mod?
ColonelPete replied to Jinx__69's topic in Neueinsteiger
Wird in detaillierten HUD im Spiel neben dem Fadenkreuz angezeigt. Musst Du nur in den Einstellungen aktivieren. -
One cannot select the game mode. One still ends up in Epicenter...
-
Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance
ColonelPete replied to Excavatus's topic in General Discussion
That is why you won. WG was "cheating" for you. -
Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance
ColonelPete replied to Excavatus's topic in General Discussion
Yes, it is clearly "cheating" when one bot performs better than another, right? -
Why does the WG not take player statistics into account?
ColonelPete replied to xKrisgard's topic in General Discussion
And still we have F2P Unicums and whaling fortypercenters... Yeah, WG must be cheating hard then... -
Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance
ColonelPete replied to Excavatus's topic in General Discussion
Your "cheating" Bot still outperformed the enemy St. Louis... Maybe WG was "cheating" for you? Maybe they think you needed the help? -
Why does the WG not take player statistics into account?
ColonelPete replied to xKrisgard's topic in General Discussion
That is usually the case... -
Why does the WG not take player statistics into account?
ColonelPete replied to xKrisgard's topic in General Discussion
The MM would select the teammates accordingly, that both teams have equal strength. But making sure that both teams are always equal does. -
Why does the WG not take player statistics into account?
ColonelPete replied to xKrisgard's topic in General Discussion
I am not saying that. I am saying that when the MM selects teams to have euqal chance of winning, then winrating means nothing. It also means that bad players do even get less encouraged to get better, since they do not win more by getting better and their targets get only harder to hit. The waitiing times will be glorious. -
Why does the WG not take player statistics into account?
ColonelPete replied to xKrisgard's topic in General Discussion
If the intention is to make the teams more equal, then you end up with 50% winrating. That will influence the individual WR and then you have a MM that will try to sort players that are all around 50%. That is called Random. And the question is, if a team of 50% WR players is as strong as a team that is half 40% and half 60% players...
