ColonelPete

Es gibt genug, die so denken, und weiterhin WoWs spielen.

Mit dieser Einstellung. Je mehr Spieler so denken, desto mehr Gefechte dieser Art wird man haben.

Here are the last 28 days:

As I told you, low number of matches paired with your confirmation bias will lead to that perception. There is an easy test. Take your ship with your best performance, let a new player play it, you will see it performs much worse. The difference in performance is not caused by the ship, it is called player skill.

And that is a an arbitrary selection. A match lasts much longer. The skill is to get that close to a DD and survive. Maybe take out a GK yourself and go DD hunting and tell us how it went...

Also in ueber 6 Jahren wurden die Ruderstellzeiten des einen oder anderen Schiffes geaendert. An der Iwaki wurde aber schon seit Jahren nichts mehr gemacht und ich bezweifle das an ihrem Ruder was geaendert wurde. Auch wurde keine allgemeine Aenderung an DD durchgefuehrt. Es macht halt einen Unterschied ob Du eine Minekaze oder Shima steuerst.

But they do not... 8k is on par with your example, not worse. And at 6.5km, the main guns can hit better.

That is a very limited view. You are just looking at a few seconds. Secondaries usually do 10 to 20% of the total damage in a match. In an exceptional game it might be 50%. At that range a GK main gun salvo can do 8 to 15k to a DD. You are lucky he had the wrong ammo loaded.

If a BB did that much damage with secondaries vs a DD at that distance without investing into the secondaries, then that BB was lucky as hell. You can detonate DD with a lucky secondary hit since 2015. That was never a reason to complain about secondaries.

Fair. A DD that close is deadly to a BB. Investing 7 points and modules to help the BB fight DD that get themselves spotted that close should give some results.

The average winrate of a player with 15k matches is 51.91%, the average for a player with 5k matches is 51.26%. When a player with 4k matches cannot deal with a player with 15k matches, one should not play Ranked.

The world does not work that way.... The right ammo choice depends on the battle. Even if you could select one type for each ship before the battle, there is a good chance it is not the right one for the next battle. Making mistakes and doing less of them is what differentiates players in their results.

It does not matter how many people saw that. 1500, 2M or 3B people , it is still only one battle. And I am pretty sure that, if you showed the battle an experienced player without any comments or sound and asked him after watching if he noticed something out of the ordinary, he would probably tell you that this was a normal, well played battle.

One could just press the ammo you want at the beginning of the match.

Most german BC are weaker than GK When a Sub gets itself spotted and shot at, then that is its commanders problem, not that Subs can dive and be safe... One should avoid close combat with a ship with torps, even Hipper can sink GK that way and she is not a strong ship Secondary damage gives less Base XP, to get good results you need to know how to play, most players fail in them

When you do not like the ship, you do perform worse. Doubtful... Something contant is not RNG...

That is like saying you always hit on one account and always miss on the other. Doubtful... That is called confirmation bias. There is nothing to be fixed, except your perception perhaps.

That is the problem with a small sample. It is easy to play 20 battles and have worse results. But you said yourself, you improved your stats on the original account slightly, so it does NOT depend on the account, but the player. Otherwise a random person with your alt account would get the same results as you. Doubtful... It is called a small sample size.... I played 388 different ships in Random, but I have only on 26 ships 100 or more battles. Even with a sample of 300 battles there can be a noticeable difference in performance between two samples. I could start a new account and play 14k battles on over 300 ships again and most ships stats would look differently to this account, some probably significantly. Some would be worse, some would be better. Any other result is highly improbable.

it should be obvious that tastes are different and different playstyles of ships "click" better with certain players when you play the same ships on different accounts, you need to consider your experience, an experienced player gets better results

Es sollte doch klar sein das der Beifang für Spieler, die sich schon viel erspielt haben, mit der Zeit uninteressant werden. Wenn man nichts hat, ist der Beifang super. Wenn man schon 3000 Tarnungen hat, sind weitere Tarnungen eher uninteressant. Daher empfehle ich allen, kauft was Ihr wollt und gebt Euer Geld nicht für was Zufälliges aus, was Ihr unter Umständen gar nicht gebrauchen könnt.

Ich habe fuer meine: Smolensk Leone Carnot Novorossiysk Flint keinen Cent ausgegeben.

Weekdays were never different from weekends...

Nope.

That is why I was asking him if that discount was too much too. I find it strange that someone who spends that much time on the game would even consider buying something at full price that is regularly heavily discounted.

The topic is about premium time. I do not think that less than 40€/year is beyond ridiculous.