ColonelPete

Neue Codes werden hier im Forum oft genug gepostet...

Solo... KA wer da behauptet Weltmeister zu sein. Und da man regelmaeesig auch gegen staerkere Teams ran muss, ist 60% schon sehr gut. Aber wenn der Wert fuer Dich nichts aussagt, macht es ja wahrscheinlich wenig Unterschied wenn Du die 49-50-51% ins Team bekommst und der Gegner die 53%-60% Spieler bekommt.

You do not train with the whole community. The US has some of the best universities in the world, while the average education level is pretty low. How do they do that? They attract the best and brightest from all over the world and do not depend on their own scientists.

Da wir alle solo die gleichen Mitspieler und Gegner auf lange Sicht haben, dient die Siegrate der Vergleichbarkeit.

Gut, wenn Du es noetig has Dich selbst auszuwerten, dann ja.... Das hilft Dir aber nicht bei den Daten von anderen Spielern.

But that is the answer to your question. Do not ask when you do not want to hear the answer.

We are talking about WoWs. The competitive crowd in Starcraft is MUCH bigger. We have too much variation in WoWs, unless you think that the quaterly changes of winners in these competitions reflect quarterly changes of average skill of the server population...

No, it is not, as explained.

Das war aber nicht die Aussage...

These tournaments are played by a tiny amount of players of each server and do not say anything about the general skill level. These tournaments also had changing results over the years. In some the EU teams did not look that good.

You cannot sell that does not exist. Btw. one ship was for sale (slightly under 20€ if remember correctly) before it became a full premium and the other you could get for free...

Du hast aber über Spieler geschrieben...

Do not expect any improvements:

Alles unter 90% macht keinen Sinn.

So you call the difference between todays MM and this nitpicky, interesting: So you are saying that good results and frustration lead to more spending, and frustration also leads to less spending. Interesting.... So, no matter what WG does, people spend more or not... There is no imaginery number. The system does not use an imaginary number for MM.

Das gegen wen kannst Du aber nicht sehen. Bei 200 Gefechten kannst Du nicht mit Sicherheit sagen ob ein Spieler mit 48,5% oder 51,5% Siegrate besser ist. Die statistische Streuung liegt zwischen 3 und 6 %-Punkten. Und das wird momentan WIE unterbunden?

A significant amout of Schliefens secondaries are mounted in casemates and I doubt you aim your HE that low consistently... And who says that the AA you destroyed were not 105mm guns?

We have hundreds or even thousands screens of win/loss streaks posted on the forum. The vast majority does not look like this. The people complaining about their x losses in a row streak would be happy about these results...

Skill comparison based on average damage? So when players are smarter and focus more DD or just face more DD on average, they are less skilled

The weak AA mounts of Kremlin are "balancing" feature...

Auf proships kann man die Gefechte eines Spielers tagesgenau auswaehlen. Damit kaeme man zumindest nah an die 200 Gefechte ran, wobei ich 200 Gefechte fuer nicht ausagekraeftig halte.

Potato play is just moving forward. If you cannot defend againt that, you deserve to get sunk. When I see Schliefen dominating, she was either played very well and/or the enemy was ignoring her. Just two days ago I saw an Incomparable, which was more afraid of a Tashkent than a Schliefen and was surprised when his extremly fast ship ended ended in the secondary range of a near full health Schliefen in our spawn area (not that the flanking move was spotted 5 minutes earlier...).

Nope. Every team would need to split their forces evenly to prevent that outcome. The chance for that happening is very low. You already see that rarely with two teams.

So you want Mikasa and other Tier II to IV on Tier V? Great...

she is not fragile the guns are not bad, but could be better her maneuverability is typical for a Tier IX BB