ColonelPete

Sicher. Natürlich habe ich mit 100% Siegrate angefangen. Und nochmal, woher willst Du wissen das Du den meisten Schaden hattest? Und ja, auch bei einem Schlachtschiff gibt es mehr als nur Schaden machen. Und da Du ja immer verlierst, hast Du natürlich 0% Siegrate. oder etwa nicht? Wer keinen Spaß am Spiel hat, erzielt eher schlechte Ergebnisse.

Das fängt schon damit an das man sich nicht durchbeißen muss. Wenn Dir das Spiel keinen Spaß macht, lass es. Und keine Ahnung wie Du wissen möchtest das Du im Bezug auf Schaden ganz oben standest. Davon das reiner Schaden kein guter Indikator für gutes Spiel ist.

It would be good for the game if high tiers became less forgiving economicly.

To make this mode work: you need to disable bots select one Tier for the high and low Tier team select a fixed ratio for the number advantage select minimum number of DD, CA and BB per team Otherwise this gamemode will be hard to balance and the enjoyment for the players would be questionable.

Das was er schreibt, stimmt nicht. Das sieht man allein schon an den Unterschieden zu Deinem Beitrag.

Das man selber denken und nicht alles wiederkauen sollte...

Das Gastspiel der Uboote war Dir nicht aufgefallen?

No chance? So you win 0% of your games? Doubtful.

Yes, playing second fiddle to a Tier VIII DD is clearly a sign of brokeness...

Why did you not say that in the first place? Then we would have known much sooner what your rambling is about

The regular damage is 33%. Damage saturation reduces that further.

You know that penetrations do not do 100% damage?

And some people know what they wrote, you obviously not. The parson turbine was clearly superior to all other propulsion systems. If that is analogous to WoWs, then you think that WoWs is superior to all other computer games? In other words, it is cold outside? I know.

I already did, but it did not help. That has nothing to do with the game. You are mixing up a Monopoly with a unique selling point. A Monopoly in gaming would be when you are the only computer game company. Great, but I did not say anything about the problems of the game. How do you disagree with me then? Good for you. Guess what, one can even decide if one wants ice cream or not.

Es ist schwierig einen Spieler im Team auszugleichen, der weniger als 200 Gefechte in 6 Jahren gespielt hat und davon einen großen Teil unterhalb von Tier V...

That you claimed to have said something, you did not say.... Your criteria do not define what a monopoly is. It does not work that way... Good for you, but that has nothing to do with my comment Your position has nothing to do with my comment

A lot of words, but no answer to my question. Are you a politician? If this were only true... You wrote: There is no monopoly, there are other (ship) games out there. A game is successful when it pays off the investment and the makers can live from it. And when that is the case, it does not matter how many or how few other games are out there. Good for you. What has this to do with my statement? Or is this just another rambling?

Possible explanations: the resetting of the line did not free up any ships in port you had fewer vacant slots than you thought you have an display error and have to relogin to see the actual number

That is rather uncommon to hit that many shells. The advantage of SAP is the higher Alpha, but you still do only 10% damage vs DD. HE is much more effective vs DD.

How is "You never know all numbers of any game. That is a useless comment." the same as " why you think that the fact that we don't all the relevant numbers is irrelevant?" Do you know not know the meaning of relevant and irrelevant? Since there is no business in existence where you know all numbers of. Even the businesses themselves do not know all numbers about their business. They wish they would. Then why care about other flying games, when talking about a ship game in the first place? That is no context. That is irrelevant rambling. Like other games, you considered irrelevant or business practices, you considered irrelevant.

PR ist kein offzieller Kennwert, da sollte man eh vorsichtig sein, ich halte nicht viel von ihm es gibt so etwas wie Rundung, die Seite zeigt offensichtlich keine Dezimalbrüche an, da kann es dann passieren das eine große Verbesserung nicht viel bringt und eine kleine Verbesserung den Wert über die Rundungsschwelle bringt...

Yes, asking what your problem is, is no effort... Did you expect me to guess?

I do not know where your problem is. Can you not read the numbers? Do you not know what they mean. Not that this was explained often enough...

Not everyone likes the SAP mechanic. And you do not seem to be able to read the WR.

Sure...