ColonelPete

Extremly doubtful.

Not really. The secondaries are not strong enough. They are just a gimmick. I only play the Tier VII to IX with secondary setup. That majority of the line works fine without it.

But that is not the ship, that is the setup. When one cannot deal with 4 fires, one should consider changing the setup or else stop complaining.

WG did that before and the forum did not burn either. We told WG what we think of it, we even pointed out the consequences, but it does not matter to them. Lets see how the economic rework turns out, as this could have a much bigger effect on the game.

When you look at the forum, you see a lot of emotional players. That does not look indifferent. There is a trend that many players do not know better, therefore do not see the problems or see stuff as a problem that is not really a problem.

You wanted to calculate the team strength based on winrating You chose an algorithm that does not consider bad players with few battles appropriately and values players of similar skill differently You get flawed results

Then that is obviously not a good method to calculate team strength.

But they can have a huge impact on the match. You are ignoring that.

No. You are part of the team. The worse you are, the worse is your team. The only thing you can complain about is you. And since the MM ignores winratings, that is to be expected. I am not confusing anything. I am telling you that you get a MUCH different result when a players has a better winrating. You are basicly proving that the player is the deciding factor over a large number of battles. I also disagree with the way you calculated the teamwinrate. A 53% winrate player with 5000 games would be weaker than a 53% with 10.000 games. Also a 40% winrate player with 50 games would barely make a dent in your teams winrate, because of the low weight, but is in reality a real burden for the team.

Look at your winrate. Recalculate the teams, remove your winrating and exchange it for a 52% winrate player.

And now take a guess why your team was inferior

You are right. Close to one fire per hit...

Which means your teams winrating was higher 53% of the time. How is that a bad thing?

Really? Any specific date she was barely around? Maybe before her release?

Low amount?

Ne, das ist die Schweiz:

I am sure you have a screenshot of that...

So you are one of these players who gets 30+ fires on his ship per match?

KM BB are BY FAR the most numerous BB nation in game KM BB tend to attract less skilled player KM BB are played closer to the enemy than ANY OTHER nation the consequences should be rather obvious. No "secret code" needed...

Sure... No other ship got ever 4 fires.

That can happen to every badly played BB.

Schau mal ob Du detoniert bist.

Ja, das die Seite erst einmal genug Daten braucht, um das Ergebnis zu bewerten. Das Schiff hat kaum einer und die Schnittstelle fuer die Serverdaten duerfte erst kuerzlich freigeschaltet worden sein.

I see a changing dispersion area. No idea what you see.

I showed you the dispersion area for the Z52, according to external calculations. I have my doubts that you witness such a dispersion behaviour in game.