ColonelPete

One could say they are a "muppet" detector, for both sides. They detect the ones who cannot push, the ones that cannot read the mini map and the ones who can read the mini map, but cannot handle a single ship and have to stay at the map border to keep their ship afloat.

Only when you ignore the AP. There is a reason that Lightning is less dominant on her Tier than Jutland and Daring, even after WG slowing down their reload some patches ago.

The line is not attractive enough for the casual player. Especially the mid Tier ships throw some people off.

Ja. Da die Seite seit Dezember nicht mehr aktiv ist, gibt es keine aktuellen Daten mehr und nur noch das was jemand auf der Festplatte gesichert hat.

I suggest to look at your battle report. There is probably a notification about hitting friendlies.

Really? You are completly ignoring the base package. You basicly saying that Rupprecht, WITHOUT hydro, torps and 1/4 pen is as strong as a Georgia. And 1/3 pen is quite insane in itself.

Wir haben einfach zuviel Schiffe. Das lässt sich am besten pro Klasse beantworten. Ansonsten:

There is a difference between giving one ship small tools and the other ship power tools. That is just balance bonkers. Only when you have no clue how Georgia performs. Otherwise you would consider it a bad idea.

Why would you think that? Georgia is a completly different ship than KM BC and your suggested changes have no relation to Georgia or KM BC.

They already changed her hydro... one patch after her release. The annoucement came around two weeks after her release.

Could be the storms.

A week later she sits at 51.7%. Kremlin sits at 51.4% And Schliefens performance will worsen further.

That is exactly the reason. You could get Napoli as a coal ship.

And? DD do not get spotted at that distance.

Just move in time. 6 ships (including 3 Schliefen) vs 3 ships: We were kiting and they exhausted their push.

The table shows the performance of the last 28 days, as depicted...

Does not look too bad.

A couple of kills is more of what one does on average with any other cruiser...

Daten zu Brandschaden pro Schiff sind nicht oeffentlich verfuegbar. Wir hatten mal Daten zu Brandschaden pro Klasse, aber die Daten sind schon recht alt und wuerden bei der aktuellen Frage eh nicht helfen. Da GK und Preussen fast dasselbe Modell und die gleichen Brandparameter haben, basieren Unterschiede auf der persoenlichen Spielweise und Zufall.

Maybe do not imagine too much. We just had a forum member here who showed his statistical data over 600 matches, which clearly shows that the player makes a difference. And if you knew what you are talking about, you would know that the MM was MUCH worse in the past, but players complained less. The problem is that the players changed and you cannot fix that with the MM. WG messed up the economy. That has to be fixed. And when you bring up other games, you should not forget the drama about their MM. I know of NO team game, where the players are happy about the MM. NOT ONE!

It is not about the players that play well consistently. It is about the players that play well from time to time or what one could call lucky. Do you really want to reward that more? And the system does not discourage lower Tier players. One has a lot of thresholds to chose from and one can reach a lot of them from lower Tier.

The better you play consistently, the quicker you advance. You want that players, that play well from time to time, get better rewarded. What do you think is better for the quality of overall gameplay?

I suggest to be nicer to the players, then you get more reports. And one should know that more than one report of the same person does not do a thing...

For some players even the strongest ships are still too weak.

The secondaries of the BC line are much stronger. That would give ample room to change the secondaries of the orginial line without making the ships too strong. I personally would prefer a slight change of sigma for the main guns for some of the ships.