ColonelPete

Except that I never wrote that and this is just stuff uninformed people make up in their mind... But who needs facts nowadays, right?

Das ist aber nicht alles was Du geschrieben hast... Und ja, es sollte klar sein das es nicht nur einen Grund gibt.

Was ist daran zweifelhaft?

In den letzten 12 Monaten hatte das Spiel etwas mehr Aktiviät auf dem EU Server als in den 12 Monaten vor dem CV rework.

https://stats.wotapi.ru/stats/wows/eu/total

That is no excuse. Just information for you, since you claim to own coal ships and seem to have interest in Napoli.

Marceau ist nicht besonders stealthy. Und Ragnar und Smaland machen einen Torpedo DD, wenn überhaupt, nur kurz auf. Und wenn sie feuern, sind sie dann 20s sichtbar.

That must be the reason you still answer me... Why are you so eager to show us that you have once again no idea what you are talking about?

Tiers that can be filled with Bots in Random are Tier I to V. From Tier VI on, you should be safe from Bots.

I got mine for that reason back in the day. BUT, I got her because as a DD she was cheap. Generally ships that do realiable damage are better at credit farming. With a DD you risk having "bad" rounds (either the match goes badly for you or it goes too well and you just cap and run after fleeing enemies, which you cannot really damage well that way).

But you did... 90% of the time there is no point in playing Once you get to tier 5 you can forget fair games 80% of the time you are bottom tier and have practically no chance of surviving, let alone doing well. +2 -2 mm DOES NOT WORK.  And that is just your first post...

Also man kann DD auf die Entfernung treffen. Bei den sehr schnellen DD ist das natürlich schwierig, aber die haben auch nicht die Dauer DPS. Und vier Treffer HE machen mehr als 5k damage, wenn der Alpha Schaden bei 5k liegt. Und Kanonenboote sind in der Regel leichter zu entdecken, weshalb Torpedoboote Ihnen ausweichen können.

And that why I checked your claim. You are posting these numbers, not me. And they contradict your claim, even when you have 100% survival rate in the matches you are not bottom Tier, which is doubtful... Which contradicts your claim that you have no chance of doing well, fight higher Tier ships or that there is no point in playing...

Once agdin you are mistaken. I see a pattern here. You mentioned your survival and made an outragous claim. I just fact checked that. If it did not work, one could not play. Ships do not consist of one thing. Nicholas has also decent guns. Select your fights. And yes, even short range torps can be used for an ambush. Read your post... "80% of the time you are bottom tier and have practically no chance of surviving, let alone doing well." You made a claim about having no chance when being bottom Tier and being bottom Tier 80% of the time. How does that explain your winrate?

That has nothing to do with arrogance, it just the way the game works and you become decent Where do I do that? I do not mention your stats, let alone judge them... It obviously works or how to you play a game that does not work since 2015? Which is objectivly wrong in WoWs, as I already showed you.. You just mentioned it. And when you claim your rate is near 0 at bottom Tier and claim you are bottom Tier 80% of the time, then your survival rate should not be much higher than 20%, even with a survival rate of 100% in all other matches, which is not the case. It is just math. Which also contradicts your point of being bottom Tier 80% of the time and having no chance...

If you gave up less often, it would work better +2/-2 MM applies to BOTH teams, where is the problem speak only for yourself and considering your survival rate, your numbers do not add up adapt why the improvement to 1? the game works since 2015...

That would make botting even easier. Just go for the border. The more people do it, the more rewards you get for doing nothing.

there are A LOT of players complaining about patch sizes even on my 10 year computer the installation of patches went rather quickly

Nochmal: Wenn Du zurücksetzen kannst, geht das mit EINEM Forschungsbaum-Schiff. Wenn Du noch NICHT zurück setzen kannst, benötigst Du MEHRERE Forschungsbäume auf Tier X. Erst dann erhälst Du die Fähigkeit Bäume zurück zu setzen. Bisher ist noch immer nicht klar was Du genau willst.

Hast Du bereits die Fähigkeit Forschungsbäume zurück zu setzen? Wenn nein, spielt die Anzahl der Schiffe keine Rolle, wie ich Dir schon sagte. Wenn ja, kannst Du einen Baum auch mit einem Schiff zurück setzen, bringt nur nicht viel. Es hilft in dem Thread zu antworten, den Du geöffnet hast. Für Antworten neue Threads zu öffnen führt nur zu durcheinander.

Nicht wirklich. Es wurde auf bestimmte Arten von Cheats eingegangen. Es ist seit Jahren bekannt welche Art von Cheats existieren. WG hat sogar ein Tool eingeführt und dies auch bekannt gegeben, das Nutzer dieser Cheats entdeckt. Als das aktiviert wurde gab es einige Schreierei hier im Forum. Und ja, da waren auch sicher falsch Positive drunter.

We had multiple polls about that. They show all the same. https://forum.worldofwarships.asia/topic/52897-feedback-thread-for-update-0109/

At very close range you risk overpens on some ships, but the dispersion is objectivly tighter.

Die Anzahl der deutschen Schiffe spielt keine Rolle. Es zählt die Anzahl der fertig erforschten Bäume.

Does someone claim that?