Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

ColonelPete

Players
  • Content Сount

    38,559
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    19178
  • Clan

    [-SBG-]

Everything posted by ColonelPete

  1. ColonelPete

    Italian Destroyers: Early Access

    Really? I get all Tech Tree ships for free.
  2. As if going up a Tier would be p2w...
  3. ColonelPete

    Italian Destroyers: Early Access

    I just saw this: That means you need Main Battery Expert to increase the gun range. I do not think that was necessary. Taking the range module and forfeit the reload module is already a high price. At least the new camos look nice.
  4. ColonelPete

    Sammelthread vs fokussierte Feedback Threads

    Eine Unterteilung hat den Vorteil das man das Feedback besser bündeln kann. Allerdings sollte es auch ein allgemeines Thema geben, damit auch Themen abgedeckt werden, die in der Unterteilung nicht berücksichtigt wurden.
  5. ColonelPete

    After the Schlieffen Hype has settled...

    For some reason you did not wait with Schliefen. As one can see with Kremlin, it can take 6 to 8 months to stabilize the stats of a top Tier ship. On the other hand, I would expect WG to use skill based data to evaluate ships and WG has shown in the past that this data exists.
  6. ColonelPete

    After the Schlieffen Hype has settled...

    That is not half the ships on a flank. And considering your new claims, she does not get the XP for that. She has the second lowest XP gain of all Tier X BB...
  7. ColonelPete

    After the Schlieffen Hype has settled...

    Sure, that is why she averages 3kills/battle...
  8. ColonelPete

    After the Schlieffen Hype has settled...

    Preussen is new. Early adopters tend to be veterans who have credits/XP for new ships and really want to play the ship. Also one of the reasons Schliefen was performing that well at the beginning. You could see the same with Kremlin in the past: There are some ships with few players, that perform not so well. It all depends on what types of players are dominant in a player group. And if groups are small enough, results can be very variable (see Alabama ST, one month she is the strongest performing Tier VIII BB and the next month she is worst, since only 20 people play her a few times during that period).
  9. ColonelPete

    Ranked not being that much ranked

    Ranked needs changes in the progression. The removal of protected ranks would be an option.
  10. ColonelPete

    After the Schlieffen Hype has settled...

    Nope. As I said, these are not her final stats. They will sink further. Changes were not needed.
  11. ColonelPete

    After the Schlieffen Hype has settled...

    While her winrating went down as predicted (and ignored by WG), she still performs decently. @YabbaCoe @Seraphice I wish WG did not mess around with the ship, as the stats will get even worse over time, without any need for meddling. Also as predicted, she gets now outperformed by the MUCH older Kremlin...
  12. ColonelPete

    Ita DDs (finally)

    Yeah, but AA usually does not decide matches. Guns and torps do.
  13. ColonelPete

    The economy in WoWs

    I did not say one did. But someone was fantasising about kill steals. If almost noone does 500% ship damage, who is supposed to get the Kraken then? Almost noone? Sometimes one does not get the kill and sometimes one gets a kill with a few points of damage. Balances out in the long run. And letting enemies get away because one did not shoot at a low health enemy before, is not really smart. Only a sunk enemy is a good enemy. And when bringing up kill steals, one should not complain, when it gets discussed.
  14. ColonelPete

    Ita DDs (finally)

    That is what I said. That is no assumption. That is not a personal attack, not even close.
  15. ColonelPete

    The economy in WoWs

    Not really. You get as many Krakens as you deserve. Sometimes you are lucky and sometimes you are unlucky. In the long run, you get the right amount. Almost noone does 500% damage to enemy ships, when they get a Kraken.
  16. ColonelPete

    Ita DDs (finally)

    For someone that complaints so much about MM, you seem to have a high opinion about the skill level of the playerbase and their experience. Not everyone has 12k battles under their belt... Yes, torp range is ok. But they do not work that well for immediate self defense.
  17. ColonelPete

    Ita DDs (finally)

    Hopefully they increase the gun range on some ships. Otherwise some inexperienced players will have a horrible stock grind.
  18. ColonelPete

    Update 0.11.2: Italian Destroyers. Part 1

    I am not. And I am not surprised.
  19. ColonelPete

    Update 0.11.2: Italian Destroyers. Part 1

    Yes, you are wrong. Some RM DD have a shorter gun range than their concealment range...
  20. ColonelPete

    Update 0.11.2: Italian Destroyers. Part 1

    By getting to your concealment range...
  21. ColonelPete

    Update 0.11.2: Italian Destroyers. Part 1

    It is not about long range. It is about having enough range to shoot at enemies that spot your ship...
  22. ColonelPete

    Update 0.11.2: Italian Destroyers. Part 1

    I still do not think that some RM DD have enough gun range.
  23. ColonelPete

    The economy in WoWs

    It is a different Tier and not part of the current game... And as I said in that thread, I would have preferred if they made Tier X into a credit sink.
  24. ColonelPete

    How the F do points work?

    If that were the case, why are so many ships sunk inside smoke?
  25. Not a fan. the ships are completly artificial, while the game still lacks many historical ships and designs they have special gimmicks, which set them apart from the rest of the tech tree ships and increase the difference between inexperienced and experienced players even further; and that difference is already huge! increasing the service cost for Tier X ships would have been a better measure to solve the high Tier overpopulation
×