ColonelPete

And they can decide to still play bonkers.... In other words, when a ship is not fun to play against, it is ego-centric? Interesting. But that is not how this works.

It is not uncommon. Player stats clearly show that. And if players are too clumpsy, whatever that means, then that is obviously a player issue too. WG cannot force players. And how does Ragnar promote a ego-centric playstyle, especially when it is obvious, that it lead to a win in this case?

That does not make sense. Should I guess what you want to tell me? But I have the feeling you urgently need to inform yourself how correlation works. Sure? Lets see: So math teachers, that like math, are worse math teachers? If that comes from experience, that might explain your knowledge about correlation... Since when is being perfect a measure of being awake? If that were the case, most of humanity would be considered asleep while speaking. Do you want to tell me that you are sleep-typing now? Since the post is not perfect "grammatically". But feel free to bring up documented cases where a sleeping player stood up, went to his computer, turned it on, logged into the game, started playing and used chat while sleeping

Then why do you claim the statements are different? You started that argument and that does not answer my question where I debate your experience. Where does your requirement of imaprtiality come from then? I did not start it. To everyone. One does not type meaningful sentences without being aware that one is typing and what one is typing. Yes, some people type "wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwweeee" by accident. That is not what I am talking about. No, he was talking about knowing why one does something, while I was talking about being awake. That is what I was talking about. People do not type meaningful sentences while they are asleep.

It is the same. You do not seem to understand how correlations work. If A is correlated to B, then B is correlated to A. Please show us. Not really. A math teacher does not need to be impartial to math to explain math. One could even say that many are biased towards math. So when you start the debate, I am derailing it? Riiight... Suggestion: stay on topic in your own thread. Writing without being aware that you are writing does not fall in the category of no attention You do not even understand what I write

I am not arguing against scientist, I am aguing against missunderstanding what I wrote. They write about something completly different than I wrote.

I do not mind that you do not see the contradiction, not surprising really, I am just pointing it out.

That has nothing to do with being clever. You have to be conscious to make a decision. You are mixing up consciousness and awareness. You are not always aware why you come to a certain decision, but it is still your decision and your responsible for it.

Since when is carrying the team to the win egocentric? On one hand you say that playerskill makes the game and then you deny that "it's the playerbase'"?

It still says the same.... I am not debating your experience. I am just explaining why you experienced that and why your conclusions are flawed. For some reason you are debating if I said correlation, despite me writing that obviously... Unless you play while sleeping, you are conscious.

I doubt that you make them in your sleep and that they are legally binding. You have to be conscious to make a decision.

But I wrote about correlation... Maybe reread what I wrote... A correlation, as you and I wrote. No idea what you want to debate. You get a chat ban only for one of these. And typing is something you do consciously. A choice is conscious. I never heard about a unconscious choice.

I was writing about typing. You do not get a chat ban for yelling... And when you yell words, it is conscious choice, unless you yell in your sleep, but that SHOULD have nothing to do with playing the game.

But I did... You wrote: That includes players rushing into enemies and getting frustrated.

That is not unconsciously typing in chat.

Which is a correlation. That is true, but not what you wrote.

Man sollte solche Sachen auch nicht in jedes Chatfenster hämmern...

So you are unconsciously typing in chat? I suggest to see someone for that. I did not say that.

You stated that it is a correlation. And if the correlation is causal, that would even be more reason to not be toxic to improve gameplay. You claimed a 100% resposibility. How does that include players rushing into the enemy or getting distracted by famility members and get sunk?

Since toxiticy is a choice, the best option would be to be less toxic. An easy way to improve ones gameplay.

Obvsiously not, otherwise you would not have said no to my example... How is WG responsible when a players rushed blindly into half the enemy team, is sunk and the player gets frustrated?

We have such players. And this applies not only to Tier I...

How good you play determines your winrate, after a sufficient number of matches.

A correlation can be causal or not... The source of frustration does not matter.

There is a correlation between being frustrated and being toxic. There is also a correlation between being frustrated and having bad games (which some tend to call bad MM). That would explain the correlation between being toxic and having bad games (which some tend to call bad MM).