ColonelPete

so häufig sind die Situationen nicht wenn es zu solchen Situationen kommt, hat man entweder was falsch gemacht oder das Gefecht ist eh schon lange entschieden ein einzelner Spieler wird das Gefecht von Beginn an nicht durch 1v1 Situationen entscheiden im gegnerischen Team gibt es geug Spieler, die dem eigenen Können entsprechen oder gar noch schlechter sind - gegen die kann man glänzen

Vous ne pouvez pas les obtenir maintenant.

That is what I was saying. And one cannot predict the outcome based on these parameters. For the BB tech tree lines, before the RU BB line, it worked well. Which is a guess, but one cannot really see it. The fact is that Schlieffen is usually played closer to the enemy than Repu, which improves hit rating, which makes it hard to compare both ships based on that value, because the enviromental parameters are different. When you compare GK and Repu, you know that Repu is more accurate, since the difference in dispersion area is very small, with a slight advantage for GK in overall area, while the difference in Sigma is significant.

Das ist die typische Reaktion der WoWs Spielerbasis auf Hilfestellungen. Sind ja alles Experten, deswegen spielen sie ja auch alle so gut...

Ich erzähle das meinen Mitspielern regelmässig. Zur Not muss ich für die Map Kontrolle sorgen. Und Bücher bringen in der heutigen Zeit wenig. Wir haben Videosammlungen, die zeigen wie es richtig geht und selbst die werden ignoriert...

There are none we players have access to. Not that it matters.

When a ship does not score and does not win, then it is not strong. When you get sunk by it, you should ask yourself why you are the one getting sunk, while your team does fine. Yes. It is called positioning. When you try to tank a BB for your team in a cruiser, you will usually lose. A DD just needs to stay hidden... When you team needs all match to sink a Schlieffen, your team is doing it wrong or the Schlieffen is not really pushing... Btw. the average Ohio outperformend the average Schlieffen significantly the past 28 days...

Wenn ein Train von 3 Schiffen aufgehalten wird, dann spielt der Train nicht zusammen. Teamarbeit ist Map Kontrolle. Entweder verhinderst Du das Deine Mitspieler ins Flankenfeuer fahren, in dem Du Dich um die flankierenden Gegner kümmerst, oder Du nimmst den Gegner unter Flankenfeuer. Mit dem ganzen Team auf einer Seite kann man das nicht. Da kann man nur hoffen das der Gegner noch schlechter spielt.

Then why do so many players get themselves sunk before their secondaries can do something useful, if it is just bot work? When you go forward, without the enemy Schlieffen being spotted, despite you knowing that the enemy team has one, and get into a situation you cannot get out, then there is nothing more to discuss. And 90% of the Schlieffens get spotted long before they are 13km away from you. I fail to see what XP and silver have to with your problem in match. And when you compare Schlieffen and Hannover, you should also note: Hannovers higher DPM Hannovers Overmatch capabilities Hannnovers superior main gun penetration Hannovers superior armor Hannovers superior HP... ... which leads to better peforming Repair party Hannovers slightly better performing Hydro

Which is why I was doubtful they would work that way. If they have extremly narrow spreads and short range, I would be ok with it. I care about hits, not dispersion area. And it hard to compare BC dispersion to Thunderer, when the dispersion area of Thunderer is smaller... That is what I mean with lack of transparancy.

I doubt that is the torpedos we are getting. We do not know how much their are comparable to normal BB dispersion. Can you judge if a BC dispersion with 1.5 Sigma is better than a BB dispersion with 2.0 Sigma?

So you see the Schlieffen from kilometers away and you cannot evade her? And I see no problem to damage the ship.

That is disappointing. I am quite sure when you increase the weight of the shell to 116kg and lowered the Krupp from 3330 to around 2440, you would get similar penetration values. The current ballistics are not easy to handle for many, which makes the ship less popular. It is a pitty that historical accuracy is sacrificed for such a minor issue. As if there were no other options to balance the ship...

Ist nur kein 1v1 Spiel... Der Bundesligaspieler, wenn man ihn mal trifft, hat in der Regel auch Kreisklasse und/oder gar F-Jugend in der Mannschaft...

Sein Post hat nichts mit Low Tier zu tun, sondern mit Niederlagen... Sind doch zwei verschiedene Dinge. Und ja, Low Tier stoert mich nicht.

No, that is the WoWs playerbase...

Overall the pace of content creation seems to come at the cost of quality. I suggest to slow down.

That is just what you wrote.... They are also balanced vs BB, that is why some even outperform BB. Making them a different class will not change that or improve balance. You have the same power differences among the "BC" as you have among the BB. That should be obvious. Needless to say WG would need to fill the holes in the tech trees from such a change and they will probably not agree with your definition of "BC". Gneisenau is not one, she is a fast BB.

Apparantly not all the time, as you significantly won more than on average.... I do not see you complaining that you won more than usual.

New Map, Great Supercruisers as tech Tree ships from Tier VIII on and even a premium on Tier VII sounds still like a bad idea. They will be a nightmare to balance Arms Race: So you think that players can handle Arms Race when they are unable to understand the concept of Epicenter? This will make it worse! I hope you are aware that Arms Race will mess up ship performance stats, which will make ship performance less transparent. And yes, Epicenter was quite fun on some maps. Clan Battles Do you really have to push Superships down our throats? Is that really necessary? Subs, just remove them Mini Map, sounds interesting

UK BC: I suggest the long range combat role, remove defensive fire (why are you so eager to put it on BB?), remove torps, make the HE a bit weaker, make them more agile and add a reload booster, the Royal Navy trained hard for high rates of fire , Repulse is a good role model please stop giving BC wonky dispersions with low Sigmas, we cannot really compare the accuracy to normal BB, which makes the effect of this dispersion less transparent not happy about another Supership Cruiser especially with an anachronistic gun caliber...

Gneis is not more likely to get citadelled as other BB.... and there are BB that get a lot easier citadelled than some other BB. And as I said, Gneis still performs better than Duke. I see no reason to differentiate because of that. You also get similar problems when one side has Dukes and the other side has Sinops. Do they need seperate classes too? And when you look at Heinrich, Strasbourg, Scharnhorst and Hood, you know that performance has NOTHING to with "class"...

You just confirmed they are balanced as BB and do not need rebalancing. What is the problem now? And Gneis is a proper BB. I doubt you will get better results with one team having only Duke of Yorks.

Whining when things do not go well and keeping silent when matches go great - the wows playbase... The only way this playerbase could be content is when everyone is winning all the time and even then I am not sure...

Then they do not need a new class, as I said.