ColonelPete

Nun, die statistische Zusammenhänge sind in diesem Fall auch nicht nach 3 Ereignissen mit dem bloßen Auge zu erkennen. Da bräuchte es schon mehr Ereignisse und mindestens eine Liste. Die Mühe kann man sich natürlich machen oder einfach auf die fertige Übersicht mit den Drop Chance von WG schauen.

That would speak for more experienced players on the Montana. He did not ask for help. It is not my problem that you do not see any change in the game since 2015.

I doubt the ship is the problem.

Ich gehe fest davon aus das wir zukünftig eine IJN BC Linie sehen werden.

By access. All players have the same access to them. The skill distribution of players should be similar for all tech tee tree ships of a specific class and Tier.

Tech Tree ships are a somewhat controlled, that is why I did not mention the other ships.

A rant is not a conversation. Did you really expect to be taken seriously after your last post?

Dude, after how many years and battles, haven't you got the message yet? no one cares about your feelings™. Looks like you are bothered by facts. How modern of you

Preussen is the third best performing Tech Tree Tier X BB of the last 28 days.

I am not saying that, that depends on the situation. That is why I am surprised that you have difficulty spotting the Schlieffen in time...

Who cares about one km more secondary range.... If players are able to focus the greatest threat, then she is quite easy to sink. She is strong when she gets ignored.

I am sure the grown-ups can find the old threads and read about it

Wildfremde Leute waren nicht beleidigt, wenn sie so angesprochen wurden? Das wuerde mich wundern. Da hat teilweise ein "Du" zur Eskalation gereicht.

No. Still not thinking.... Then the other players could just watch the monitor and do nothing and get the same results. They would not either... Nope Only around 60 to 65% of the time....

You just do not know. And yes, even good players can mess up. Do you even think about what you write? If player skill were irrelevant, then you could start a match and get the same results as usual, without touching your keyboard and mouse, just by watching the monitor. You do not, obviously....

While that is possible, it is imprudent to draw such a conclusion from these few matches. Nobody is that bad. Not even a one year old that accidently hit the battle button and is occupied with his belly button for the rest of the match would be that bad...

Vertical dispersion is part of the dispersion and that is where the RU BB tech tree deviates a lot from other BB.

Do you know what makes more damage than a hole? An explosion in that hole. There are enough ways a bullet can go through a body without killing the body. Now imagine someone sticks an explosive in that hole in the body and detonates it... 18k battles...

Nope. GK and Yamato are quite close. Spot the outlier: Good to know. But when you look at the graphs, it is questionable if these graphs really repesent the dispersions in game. Dispersion that gets smaller over range?

Das war auch früher nicht anders. Damals wussten noch mehr das es eine gute Idee ist den DD zu beschießen, der gespotted wird.

Ne, am Cap wo es selten 1v1 Situationen gibt. Aus irgendwelchen Gründen mischen immer irgendwelche anderen Spieler ein....

Aber in den Containern ist das Ausgewählte enthalten.

Dann ist ja gut. Klar. In 37% der Fälle fahre ich die sogar selber.

RU BB tech tree has a completly different base dispersion. If it were just a reverse IJN BB dispersion, the ships would not be problematic. The Sigma is not in the graph...

Und was ist mit den DD?