ColonelPete

Oekonomie ist Pay 2 Progress. Das Crediteinkommen erhoeht nicht die Kampfstaerke im Gefecht.

Welchen Spielvorteil bietet das Schiff? Du musst ja auch gegen haertere Gegner ran. Wenn die besser sind als Du, verlierst Du eher. Die meisten Spieler haben eine mit dem Tier abnehmende Siegrate. Das waere dann Pay to lose.

I see damage. HE has an area effect. It can damage ships without hitting them.

But not all ships have depth charges...

Only for bad players. Looks more like lucky. That is more than double your average on Shima... And these are not shells, but torpedos. Different mechanic, but you probably knew that.

Because WG said so in the announcement.

There is your problem. When you play like this, you depend on some lucky hits. It happens sometimes and you do good damage, but usually it does not happen. With a replay or video, one could tell you what you could do better. Someone with your experience should get better resullts.

Superschiffe sind überflüssig und wenig innovativ die Spezialfähigkeiten erhöhen nur den Unterschied zwischen guten und schlechten Spielern, was die Gefechtsdauer weiter verkürzen dürfte und die Ergebnisse einseitiger macht

I consider DD with SAP to be problematic, either it is useless or too strong the short gun range and SAP makes them good DD killers - you can quickly disengage and usually vanish when you sink your prey the short gun range limits your ability to support teammates, which reduces teamplay overall I do not consider them to be an improvement for the gameplay of the game

You have that most of the time in the game.

I do not see a problem there.

That is like telling WG to remove math from the world. You are aware that the popular stats sites are external and that they can calculate the WR on their own?

She is, but she does not perform very well.

Basics... do not let a DD get that close use WASD when two torps are enough for you, your ship should be very agile and/or have hydro For reference:

Your lack of understanding of the game is appalling. One is usually enough.

Nope. Torps are easy to evade and ships are easy to get sunk by guns.

This is not better spotting, but worse spotting. It would also devalue Torp DD in game, which do not really belong to a strong group of DD in game.

Because that is the playerbase... The MM can only match the players that queue up... If you are really better than them, then your winrate will go up.

What has this to do with my statement? And there are enough cruisers that sunk Schlieffens in melee.

Looks like you need to learn some things.

I tend to spot them early enough. And not all Schlieffens are skilled for concealment. WASD helps vs secondaries. Sailing straight gets you hit more often. The bot gunners cannot predict evasive actions.

No. She is still too strong, that is why no sane player would demand stronger AA for her.

No No The camo belongs to the ship it was bought for.

That is called balance. And HP matter in all situations.

You were gloating about the many Hannovers you sank. Then it matters. And if you think she needs "buffs", then she is not too strong.