ColonelPete

Es wurden SEHR viele inaktive Spieler aus der Datenbank geloescht. Die waren wohl nicht so gut. Dadurch ist das Niveau der beruecksichtigten Spieler gestiegen und im Vergleich wird der Einzelne schlechter bewertet.

Yes, WG could change and adapt WoWs to a perfectly balanced game that makes everyone happy in the next 12 months, but I do not care for such fantasies they did abandon it for Alaska, and as you have argued yourself, there was obviously no lack of funds when you argue with ignoring balance, one gets the impression that you want to go too far

when you move the yardstick, you have to adapt EVERYTHING, WG has never done that and I did not see in your starting post that you proposed that It does, Alaska herself is proof enough that the US Navy was not interested in an autoloader for her 305mm guns better in this case means stronger, which is not necessary when she does fine

It should be obvious that you do not achieve balance by ignoring it which means they had use for them, the Convair YB 60 was canceled after one prototype, despite being cheaper and having a bigger bomb load than than the B52, she was just not what the Air Force wanted PR is doing fine

you do not seem to know much about balance, things can be different and balanced it would be worse if they spend money on every project infinitely I have no idea how one phones a warship

looks like you think like WG, you must be proud it proves that the US military does not mindlessly spend money on every project, as they did in this case I was talking about the US military, not WG

no thank you No need to spend money when you get the same bang for less buck, do you really want a list of projects the US stopped spending on? Zumwalt and Long Range Land Attack Projectile... that has nothing to do with the US Navy...

I do not expect us to have different game versions.

if you throw the concept overboard, everything is possible nuclear bomba are a different thing than an autolader, unless you want to face off against nuclear weapons with conventional ones... but they did give up on it

because some ships fail, you want throw the concept out of the window? BB with Halland reload times here we come! It is always great when players complain about WG making the game worse, but when players could decide themselves... That is why she has more guns The military is also about cost and time, Alaska guns were already extremly expensive and autoladers are heavy "A unique feature of these mountings was the provision of a projectile rammer to transfer projectiles from the projectile storage room onto the rotating ring. However, this feature was not entirely satisfactory and it was omitted from the Hawaii and removed from the upper projectile flats on the Alaska and Guam" http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNUS_12-50_mk8.php

there is thing called balance Alaska and PR AP is great US Navy had no plans for an autoloader for the 305 and look at the design process and cost needed for DM and Alaska guns US Navy planned a lower RoF on Hawai or any later ship as they were not happy with some of the automated loading equipment on Alaska

Das "nur" war aber schon damals eine gaengige Behauptung.

Es dürfte niemanden geben der in der Zeit nur Low Tier war. Das "nur" ist schon eine extrem hohe Hürde.

And still stay scale less well with skill than CV...

Leider nein. Das hatte ich zum Weihnachtsevent auch gedacht, wurde danach nicht besser. 200% Tagessieg Viele Gelegenheitsspieler und Leute, die WoWs seit langem nicht mehr gespielt haben, sind wieder aktiv. Das erhöht die Varianz doch beträchtlich.

Bei mir nicht. Wenn eine Delny einfach so über Deine Cossack fährt, machst Du was falsch (Concealment, Smoke, Positioning,....)

That will only enforce WG that they are on the right Track

No, I am just experienced at using computers.

If there is a patch, it is your responsibility to check if every optional software is compatible. If you do not check, that is called a user error.

Was the mod combatible with the current game version?

then I suggest not to do it constantly on other computers the game is not crashing, the game is the same, guess what is different you still not understand what safe means, they do not guarantee you that the mods are able to run stable on any toaster, they tell you that you can use them without risking to be considered using forbidden mods when your computer runs stable and suddenly not, one should check what changed, many people come to the forum complaining about bugs in the game only to find out that the version of the game changed (and they patched their game with a multiple GB update without noticing) and that their mods are out of date and crashing the game - how that is that somebody elses fault? information about a product is usually placed below the product, makes no sense to place it above the product, as you do not know what the information is for, until you read all the information Btw...

Sieht so aus als wäre Tier VIII nicht Dein Tier.

Das haengt halt davon ab wie Du Dein Schiff aufbaust. Finde es halt immer erheiternd wie sich die einen darueber beschweren innerhalb weniger Minuten von einem CV versenkt zu werden, waehend ein CV Spieler auf der anderen Seite es so darstellt er waere er chancenlos gegen ein Schlachtschiff.

Tu le fais sur le serveur asia.