ColonelPete

This year

Now it is there:

Nope. That was never the case.

Looks like the description is just wrong. I pushed the button and then I got these missions.

Mission should be available now. I can see the mission in game, but the website gives me the same message as you got.

When you ask that question, you have not unlocked the full potential of the GC.

Die Frage ist ob Dich schon ein Schiff stört. Wenn ja, dann sind mehr Schiffe kein MM Problem.

Considering the informationen about increased base rewards and lowered service costs, I doubt that.

Ein signifikanter Anteil der Spieler hat was gegen Subs, aber das hat nichts mit dem MM zu tun...

No idea if that is ok. It is enough, but the new system is not satisfactory. I do not see the point and I fear it further promotes quick grinding and not learning to play the game.

I think I grasp the underlying problem now. If you do not know what you are writing, it explains your confusion.

You even quoted the post...

That is exactly what I am saying...

You, but not others. You are not relevant.

That does not matter. Companies could have earned more.

So there are more ways of thinking? Did you come with this revelation yourself and should we thank someone else? The grown up thing to do would have been to defend your point...

And in the 80s you could also earn even more money.

I do not play subs, but do not share your experience. I have seen enough subs at the top of the scoreboards and many last till the end of the match. The problem is the heterogen skilllevel of the sub players and many do not know what they are doing and get sunk quickly or get sunk later without doing anything important.

Still looks complicated and I doubt it will be to the playerbases benefit.

It does not matter how many of your third cousins work in the gaming industry. The industry earned money in the 80s and did not resort to this, so earning money is not the explanation for everything. Shorter games do not affect premium time, premium ships or permanent camos, they even increase your XP gain/time and depending on Tier, your credit gain/time. It is doubtful that making the playerbase unhappy increases income and it is doubtful that this is their intention. Considering the amount of complaints about the incompetence of WG, I find it surprising that you attribute so much competence to them for micromanaging their income.

PR is NOT a WG stat! And no, Brawl is not Skill based MM, should be obvious. They are just counting wins, which is utterly pointless.

PR is not a value from WG WG did therefore not change the PR Wows-numbers simply cleaned up their database and removed huge amounts of inactive accounts these accounts were mostly below average the average of the remaining accounts was therefore increased PR measures how you compare to the average Your PR went down This is not the first time this happened...

Das liegt daran wie die DD fahren, nicht am MM. Und wie Du faehrst, liegt auch an Dir und nicht am MM.

Erst bei 90s+.

A rental commander is a rental commander and not a commander you got permanently...