ColonelPete

Es wurde gesagt das die Premiums rechtzeitig vor dem BB Baum kommen, damit man seine Kapitäne trainieren kann. Ich gehe davon aus das 0.5.10 nächsten Donnerstag kommt (oder WG troll uns und der Patch kommt ne Woche später). Da wird das zeitlich eng Selbst eine Woche vorher finde ich etwas wenig, wenn man bedenkt das König Albert wahrscheinlich schon seit etwa zwei Wochen fertig sein dürfte.

You have no proof for that.

If 36k of some digital coinage that has no real value spoils your fun, then maybe the game is not for you.

Some definitely play less and/or changed to different ships. Because other ships give more rewards for less risk..

Keep copies of your old clients (that is a lot of disk space) or hope that WG introduces a replay system into the game client that is backward compatible.

Because you said this: and then this How can anyone understand you?

The difference between DDs is small to negligible. Compared to other ship classes, DD took and take HUGE risks for small rewards. Player Average for Ships [ at 2016/02/13 ] Nation Class Tier Name Win Damage Kills/Battle Survival US CA 10 Des Moines 48.93 56.456 0.92 39.96 US DD 10 Gearing 52.28 46.220 0.95 40.76 SN DD 10 Khabarovsk 50.32 52.392 1.01 42.78 JP DD 10 Shimakaze 49.56 52.324 0.90 45.94 KM CA 10 Hindenburg 48.72 59.772 0.89 45.97 JP BB 10 Yamato 51.56 85.395 0.95 48.39 US BB 10 Montana 47.36 69.930 0.87 49.19 JP CA 10 Zao 52.73 69.285 0.97 51.56 JP CV 10 Hakuryu 47.19 82.769 1.09 66.38 US CV 10 Midway 53.37 113.780 1.63 70.04 Basicly there was an inverted correlation between damage and survivability. How does THAT warrant a performance reduction of IJN DDs?

Would be nice if people informed themselves before posting stuff: Before the patch: Player Average for Ships [ at 2016/02/13 ] Nation Class Tier Name Win Damage Kills/Battle Survival JP DD 10 Shimakaze 49.56 52.324 0.90 45.94 SN DD 10 Khabarovsk 50.32 52.392 1.01 42.78 US DD 10 Gearing 52.28 46.220 0.95 40.76

EU Server Player Average for Ships [ at 2016/04/23 ] Player Average for Ships [ at 2016/05/07 ] Patch Name Win Damage Kills/Battle Survival Total battles Ratio in Tier before Fubuki 48.43 28.107 0.63 33.95 43.572 13% after Fubuki 48.38 25.714 0.59 29.36 49.870 13% before Kagero 49.05 39.944 0.74 42.46 20.142 22% after Kagero 48.93 31.155 0.62 35.26 20.587 18% before Shimakaze 49.43 52.899 0.90 44.65 16.051 34% after Shimakaze 46.74 40.075 0.72 37.45 12.758 23% Now: Player Average for Ships [ at 2016/07/30 ] Nation Class Tier Name Win Damage Kills/Battle Survival JP BB 10 Yamato 49.85 88.183 0.91 46.75 JP CA 10 Zao 50.48 73.932 0.93 52.88 JP CV 10 Hakuryu 53.59 99.228 1.46 84.15 JP DD 10 Shimakaze 47.86 40.167 0.73 38.23 KM CA 10 Hindenburg 47.14 56.412 0.73 42.93 SN CA 10 Moskva 50.07 68.525 0.91 52.48 SN DD 10 Khabarovsk 56.42 56.670 0.97 47.33 US BB 10 Montana 47.92 75.715 0.88 48.78 US CA 10 Des Moines 49.15 58.419 0.90 40.09 US CV 10 Midway 42.47 79.818 1.00 79.43 US DD 10 Gearing 50.21 43.497 0.86 36.21 Not much change... And here the Top Players: Player Ranking in jp DD Class [ at 2016/04/23 ] Name Rank Player Battles Winrate Damage Kills/Battle Survival Shimakaze 1 ZizzKun 25 80.00 115.045 2.28 80.00 Shimakaze 2 Imaduffus 21 76.19 92.916 1.86 66.67 Shimakaze 3 Deckycom 13 84.62 65.976 1.85 61.54 Shimakaze 4 wujekfresh 29 72.41 80.421 1.48 68.97 Shimakaze 5 Paff83_NL 17 76.47 84.207 1.59 94.12 Shimakaze 6 IceyJones 28 71.43 91.412 1.39 75.00 Shimakaze 7 slawek0624 15 80.00 71.636 1.00 80.00 Shimakaze 8 gromgall 85 67.06 64.987 1.32 51.76 Shimakaze 9 psychbob 21 76.19 43.436 1.24 66.67 Shimakaze 10 SeriousSamuel 12 83.33 64.931 1.25 83.33 Average 77.497 Player Ranking in jp DD Class [ at 2016/05/21 ] Name Rank Player Battles Winrate Damage Kills/Battle Survival Shimakaze 1 IceyJones 11 90.91 76.732 0.91 72.73 Shimakaze 2 Abetting 19 78.95 47.344 0.84 68.42 Shimakaze 3 InfantedeMarina1537 16 81.25 55.370 1.38 50.00 Shimakaze 4 krzys020pl 22 72.73 61.577 1.09 77.27 Shimakaze 5 MrEkkimu 21 71.43 67.188 1.14 61.90 Shimakaze 6 CountMordrek 13 76.92 51.371 0.92 69.23 Shimakaze 7 SPW60PB 32 68.75 24.414 0.47 46.88 Shimakaze 8 LittleTigru 24 66.67 65.383 1.38 66.67 Shimakaze 9 elyeex 17 70.59 46.255 0.71 58.82 Shimakaze 10 sanjan 25 68.00 35.732 0.88 32.00 Average 53.137 Just a 30% drop in average damage. Just a "slight" change. Because "They do not know how to play"... Sure... Dream on.

Naechste Woche benoetige ich kein Premium BB mehr... Habe dann genug fuer Silber zur Auswahl.

That is is called luck.

Less damage --> less effect on the outcome of the game --> less wins Does that sound like encouragement? Get close, make the damage, fight for the objective and not the border --> more wins THAT sounds like encouragement.

It is not your job to charge in without any reconnaisance. Armies that do that get slaughtered. Ships that to that get sunk. Just 101 of combat. Now you are making stuff up. Yes, you can. 7k salvo vs Benson (would have been more if he had more HP): 15:25 Sunk 3 DD in that game (someone has to do it).

Best 150mm AP in game.

Do you want some cheese? How is this: meh, compared to this?: I expect the dispersion to be similar to other BBs, some german BB might be even better. You obvioulsy do not know what brawling is. And yes, it is a good perk to have. The only thing you got right is the torpedo protection. And then you whine about something that is not even confirmed yet, let alone designed or tested...

You do not need citadels to do damage. Citadels are just the icing on the cake.

Well, bad luck I suppose.

Do not drink so much.

That is known for months now. Next time fill your reserve with captains, then ARP captains bring their own reserve slot.

--> World of Warships Wiki

If they would do that, the Albert would have been out two weeks ago.

She is ready for a long time. No idea what WG thinks...

Klar, steigt nur langsamer.

Die Werte brauche ich mir gar nicht anschauen, um zu wissen das die Atlanta schlechter abschneidet. Wie ich oben schon schrieb sind die anderen Tier VII Kreuzer interessant.