ColonelPete

Nein, die In-Game Umfragen bestehen meist aus einer Frage. Fuer laengere Umfragen wird man auf eine externe Seite geleitet.

I played all three ships and they handle extremly well. Vermont still hits like a truck.

As I already explained, that is not what I meant.

Then feel free to shoot AP at angled ships or DD all the time. I prefer HE, gives better results, but that is just me.

In my opinion the problem is the relaxed economy. Advancing the tech trees is very easy, shortening the learning phase of the players, which in turn teaches them less. Additionally unlocking new ships becomes its own reward (like new equipment in a MMORPG) and people play to get the next ship and not to win or get better, which is a completly different motivation to play the game. This sets these players apart from many veterans and the few new players that are interesting in winning matches.

I agree. But the question has two components. The "objective" skill requirement of the game and the level of skill of the playerbase. I think the game got more challenging (more mechanics, more ships) and the general skill level went down too, which explains the increased skill gap between good and bad players in 2022.

Some people claim that the game was made easier for bad players (in a gameplay sense, not the economy) and that bad players therefore perform better (win more) than then bad players in 2015.

Die Stärke eines Schiffes is relativ zum Tier, da WG die Tiers spiegelt. Ein Tier XI mag stärker als ein Tier X Schiff sein, aber dafür wird Dir auch ein Tier XI Schiff entgegen gestellt. Man sieht das daran das viele Spieler eine niedrigere Siegrate auf Tier X als auf niedrigeren Tiers haben, obwohl man auf dem Tier früher immer TopTier war.

Then the poll is obviously not for you.

We still have players around 30%. Please show the numbers that show that bad players got better. I am pretty sure that when one makes a poll, the majority would agree that bad players got worse. So spare us your speculation. Please show me these people. And a reduction of draws does not improve your winrating by 8-10%. A 50% player would need 16 to 20% draws for that. A below 50% player would exchange the majority of draws to defeats.

.... https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=wows+invisible+ships Nope. Please dream up other numbers. And yes, changing the win conditions changes the winratings, for all players. Exactly.

Damit und mit einen fast kaputten Schiff kommt man mit der Repu auf 12,81s Ladezeit. Das ist schon nah dran. + 3x Ladezeit Buff in Arms Race und dann ist man bei 8,97s.

Seit 7 Jahren haben wir Spieler im Spiel, die nicht verstehen was im Spiel passiert und Dinge in Sekunden wahrnemen, die viel laenger brauchen. Und nein, Spieler koennen Ladezeiten nicht beliebig aendern.

Range is largely Tier dependent. Some ships have less or even no range (no air strike).

Even reminding in time does not help. People want to play as they want.

Eher nicht. Superschiffe bieten keinen Vorteil fuer Tier X Schiffe.

Sorry, that is not what I meant. A player with 20 Tier IX battles is not responsible for the low skill level of the whole playerbase on high Tier. It is people with hundreds+ of battles on that Tier with similar results, that are responsible. A player like him might still recognize that he needs to learn more on lower Tiers to come back to high Tiers later.

Und wird das Ruckus Event in Belgien nicht angeboten? Das wäre mir neu.

And still people complain about being shot at by invisible ships. And still BB battles make up the biggest portion of battles of these 40% players... When you remove cover, you make gameplay more dependent on timing and reading the flow of battle, making it even harder for bad players. Ocean is a good example for that.

It would be worse if he played hundreds+ of battles that way. Yes, having such players on the team can be annoying, but with so few battles they have barely any impact on the general level of play.

A bit early for a poll. Apart from the way they play individually, I am not a fan of a supercruiser tech tree. They make gameplay harder for normal cruisers and tend to be stronger than normal cruisers.

Then I suggest to read the forums more. Bad players did not become less frequent. One might even argue the opposite is true. By making the game easier, you make it also easier for good players. The distribution does not change that way. For that you need to change the MM, either manipulate it or increase the player numbers.

Du willst wissen ob Spieler gebannt werden. Ja, werden sie. Ob WG 30 Leute an einem Tag im Monat bannt oder ueber den Monat verteilt ist in der Sache wohl wenig relevant. Oder ist es Dir wichtig das WG "Faelle" sammelt und die Accounts noch etwas aktiv sein duerfen, nachdem sie erwischt wurden? Und nein, der Bann war nicht wegen der Mod Station.

Could you please turn down the bightness of the lights, it is hard to identify ships sometimes. Better, introduce a "shade" or "sunglass" option, that makes the light darker.

Google ist schon hart... Mai 2022 https://worldofwarships.eu/de/news/general-news/mods-policy/