-
Content Сount
38,559 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
19178 -
Clan
[-SBG-]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by ColonelPete
-
Tirpitz für Weihnachtsspecial
ColonelPete replied to Beratungsresistent's topic in Allgemeine Diskussionen
Yepp. -
To cap B, you do not need to get through. DDs can get through undetected. With spotting, more ships can come.
-
You need a team to cover middle. Otherwise you will lose B in Domination and in Standard Battle you will have a DD or more in your base. A CV is not strong enough to stop a push of DDs and Cruisers.
-
Option -Continue playing. How many polls do we need?
-
Signatures make for interesting reading
ColonelPete replied to HotshotJimmy's topic in General Discussion
My stats do not take a dive. -
Yes.
-
A tactic I don't understand . So why?
ColonelPete replied to anonym_XGuN6pHmfiJ9's topic in General Discussion
That is what DDs and CVs should do. -
Deutsche Flotte schlecht gemacht...
ColonelPete replied to Marcsmen577's topic in Allgemeine Diskussionen
Player Average for Ships [ at 2017/01/07 ] Nation Class Tier Name Win Damage Kills/Battle Survival Total Battles Players JP DD 2 Umikaze 49.08 12.506 0.66 23.52 49.801 1.738 JP DD 2 Tachibana 53.31 13.513 0.81 21.82 6.006 225 KM DD 2 V-25 47.38 12.387 0.74 21.28 19.651 1.149 SN DD 2 Storozhevoi 44.97 7.673 0.45 14.73 21.342 968 US DD 2 Sampson 44.11 7.474 0.40 12.66 34.753 1.850 US DD 2 Smith 49.97 12.152 0.73 19.86 1.592 68 JP DD 3 Wakatake 47.90 14.711 0.62 18.25 89.523 5.459 KM DD 3 G-101 47.26 15.784 0.70 17.94 77.823 5.674 RN DD 3 Campbeltown 51.00 19.195 0.79 20.32 18.389 726 SN DD 3 Derzki 47.58 11.842 0.56 13.22 57.967 2.936 US DD 3 Wickes 47.14 12.245 0.55 12.55 116.754 6.448 JP DD 4 Isokaze 49.46 21.503 0.77 22.45 193.456 7.191 KM DD 4 V-170 50.35 22.422 0.83 20.92 127.978 7.623 SN DD 4 Izyaslav 47.73 15.045 0.57 14.38 73.655 2.832 US DD 4 Clemson 49.27 17.833 0.70 15.49 157.974 6.109 JP DD 5 Minekaze 49.39 23.841 0.75 23.21 209.145 5.332 JP DD 5 Mutsuki 47.42 20.448 0.57 23.58 56.374 3.057 JP DD 5 Kamikaze R 57.64 38.357 1.19 33.96 62.233 1.840 JP DD 5 Fujin 57.55 39.033 1.23 36.47 11.771 340 JP DD 5 Kamikaze 54.22 32.542 1.00 31.82 2.579 150 KM DD 5 T-22 48.94 21.392 0.65 20.60 97.800 5.184 SN DD 5 Gnevny 48.27 17.877 0.58 18.94 61.255 2.265 SN DD 5 Gremyashchy 54.06 31.965 0.98 33.33 21.439 658 US DD 5 Nicholas 47.46 17.252 0.58 14.95 156.284 5.194 JP DD 6 Fubuki 47.30 21.737 0.54 22.01 81.131 4.076 JP DD 6 Hatsuharu 50.15 25.238 0.65 27.30 51.269 2.979 JP DD 6 Shinonome 57.20 37.963 1.03 35.20 4.137 197 KM DD 6 Ernst Gaede 52.67 27.837 0.75 25.83 55.510 2.704 PA DD 6 Anshan 53.43 28.044 0.73 31.00 8.917 413 SN DD 6 Ognevoi 48.59 20.653 0.55 21.38 42.599 1.638 US DD 6 Farragut 48.89 19.929 0.57 19.51 137.855 4.586 JP DD 7 Akatsuki 48.17 26.173 0.62 23.46 120.430 5.677 JP DD 7 Shiratsuyu 55.38 37.994 0.91 36.57 42.466 1.974 KM DD 7 Leberecht Maass 54.92 34.113 0.88 30.45 26.085 1.036 PO DD 7 Blyskawica 52.21 30.786 0.70 28.80 49.151 1.752 SN DD 7 Kiev 48.58 28.778 0.65 21.78 48.742 1.783 SN DD 7 Leningrad 50.75 28.275 0.68 26.85 20.797 928 US DD 7 Mahan 47.79 22.041 0.55 20.70 121.761 4.054 US DD 7 Sims 49.62 22.513 0.58 26.64 23.053 825 JP DD 8 Kagero 49.14 29.383 0.61 28.25 114.687 4.989 JP DD 8 Akizuki 53.76 37.334 0.75 31.97 18.552 811 KM DD 8 Z-23 54.26 36.399 0.78 31.56 19.445 672 PA DD 8 Lo Yang 47.83 23.520 0.51 24.13 26.545 982 SN DD 8 Tashkent 48.29 29.389 0.55 21.08 37.332 1.418 US DD 8 Benson 50.47 30.609 0.67 27.23 129.028 4.675 JP DD 9 Yugumo 49.14 34.876 0.68 29.24 90.371 3.783 KM DD 9 Z-46 56.59 45.872 0.93 34.87 10.376 301 SN DD 9 Udaloi 52.14 46.292 0.77 32.23 26.440 932 US DD 9 Fletcher 51.14 40.215 0.78 30.03 102.318 3.583 JP DD 10 Shimakaze 48.87 48.171 0.79 35.14 93.198 3.053 KM DD 10 Z-52 50.97 47.299 0.84 30.07 5.394 182 SN DD 10 Khabarovsk 53.32 65.096 0.98 38.70 17.457 587 US DD 10 Gearing 50.86 52.855 0.88 32.01 54.303 1.911 http://maplesyrup.sweet.coocan.jp/wows/ranking/index.html -
A tactic I don't understand . So why?
ColonelPete replied to anonym_XGuN6pHmfiJ9's topic in General Discussion
Yes, that is a basic tactic for thousands of years. Generals do not attack all enemies at once, but focus their forces on select positions. -
Deutsche Flotte schlecht gemacht...
ColonelPete replied to Marcsmen577's topic in Allgemeine Diskussionen
Die Aussagen ueber Linien haben sich bisher immer bestaetigt. -
Deutsche Flotte schlecht gemacht...
ColonelPete replied to Marcsmen577's topic in Allgemeine Diskussionen
Von Tier II bis VI sind genug Spiele da. Von Tier VII bis X kann man eine Tendenz erkennen, die sich bei frueheren Linien auch immer bestaetigt hat. -
Use your Shima captain. I would not make dedicated captains for premium ships.
-
Which will be at least a week or two.
-
Do you not have an commander lying around then? Basic Firing Training, Last Stand, Vigilance or Superintendent, more HP, Concealment
-
Use the same skillset as for Minekaze, Mutsuki.
-
A tactic I don't understand . So why?
ColonelPete replied to anonym_XGuN6pHmfiJ9's topic in General Discussion
Bad teams will lose. Better teams should win and not lose because there is nobody at base. Unless your team sleeps, the enemy will not be faster. -
Skill of players is never taken into account. MM tries (and fails often) to balance the number of divisions per team.
-
A tactic I don't understand . So why?
ColonelPete replied to anonym_XGuN6pHmfiJ9's topic in General Discussion
That is exactly the reason you do it. Losing 50% of the time is not a good success rate. I have seen too often teams lose that were numerical superior, but were on the wrong side of the map. And combining fleets gives you more firepower, makes focus fire easier and in case of CVs in game makes air defense easier. -
A tactic I don't understand . So why?
ColonelPete replied to anonym_XGuN6pHmfiJ9's topic in General Discussion
In domination it is better to go for B from south. In standard battle it is a valid tactic to combine on the side of the base. If your base team fails and you are on the other side, you lose. If you are on your base side, you can still defend the base. -
Winrates and playing for the daily win bonus
ColonelPete replied to FloRead's topic in General Discussion
Mathematicly there is no problem (unless you start with a ship you are not good in). But losing again and again can demotivate you and increase your chance of losing. Better to take a break or play a different ship. -
My boss is a complete moron and is running the company into the ground!
ColonelPete replied to SovietFury43's topic in Off-Topic
Best way is to change companies. I know it is sad, when you worked for a company for years with a good reputation, to see it go down the drain, but you have to think about your own future. -
What is the reason to play American crusers ?
ColonelPete replied to veso_vn's topic in General Discussion
All Tier VIII cruisers should have heal. Depending on performance, all cruisers should get a HP buff. Pensa really needs better concealment. Depending on the resulting performance one might speak about a better firerate for US Tier VIII & IX. -
Welchen Sinn machen deutsche Zerstörer?
ColonelPete replied to True_Winterfeld's topic in Feedback Archiv
Wie kommst Du darauf das ich mit ihr aufgehoert habe? Habe sie gestern noch gespielt und werde heute mein erstes Spiel mit einem voll ausgeruesteten Schiff machen. -
Welchen Sinn machen deutsche Zerstörer?
ColonelPete replied to True_Winterfeld's topic in Feedback Archiv
Placebo, ich denke das ist ein gutes Stichwort. Interessant ist das die "Meinungsmacher" sich bei ihren Argumentationen gerne auf die weit unvollstaendigeren Statsseiten beziehen, wenn es ihnen in den Kram passt. Dann sind Zahlen gut genug. Sobald die Zahlen der eigenen Meinung wiedersprechen wird die Datenbasis von Zehntausenden Spielen angezweifelt.
