ColonelPete

She does more damage than Friedrich.

Izumo just has a higher WR than Iowa..

Stichwort: taeglich

Das waere super!

Soviel zum Thema WG macht nichts...

She has a similar performance as Friedrich and Iowa.

L2P... As if concealment could not be changed...

Certain ships can take more HE shots than others. Therefore it MAKES a difference what you are playing. UK BB flood and burn like other BB. There is no problem. Just avoid scratching the paint of high tier UK BB. Either you want to really hurt them or focus something else.

Not my experience. In 90% of the cases I get at least one answer.

In dem Du mit ihm Erfahrung sammelst und ihm ganz normal Faehigkeiten gibst. Bei einigen Faehigkeiten ist er besser als andere Kapitaene. Nachzulesen im Wiki.

You are free to communicate with your team. I suggest a strategy nearly every match.

Depends on map and ship. A cruiser is bad at capping. If the cap in front of you is not contested by your DD, you move to the next cap and support that. If your team got that cap and the next cap still needs help, you go there. Et voilà one move across the map.

Considering the inhuman behaviour of the masses, maybe you are right.

Asking nicely... yeah.. Maybe the internet is not for you.

Da habe ich laenger gebraucht...

Siehe Diskussion zu dem Thema...

And there lies YOUR problem and the root of the topic: distrust.

You cannot proof something that does not exist. And you did not answer my questions. My main problem is that your assumptions lack logic, the main problem of most conspiracy theories. If a behaviour is completly illogical, it is very unlikely to be happening. Unless you think that WG employees suffer from some sort of group mental illness.

How can you do 25k damage to him and he did not get a scratch? That makes no sense. Either you do damage or you do not, not both at the same time.

Once again... what would be the motivation? Once again... why are people complaining about bad MM if WG is "fixing" it? Once again... why are some people very bad and some very good if WG is "fixing" the matches?

You wait for WG searching for new testers. Unfortunately that means testing every type of ship. Supertesters do not work exclusivly for one ship type.

Da gebe ich Dir recht. Wir haben zwar Myogi, Ishizuchi, Dunk, Amagi und im gewissen Sinne Kongo, aber es wäre besser gewesen noch etwas Erfahrung damit zu sammeln. Hinzu kommt das diese Schiffe alle als BB klassifiziert waren. Bei Stalingrad lasse ich mir den Kreuzer ja noch eben so gefallen (technisch sehr fortschrittliches Design mit starker AA, aber extrem schwache Panzerung und kleines Kaliber für High Tier BB), aber bei Kronshtadt passt es nicht (AA ist laut Design eher schwach und würde gut als BB mit den 380mm Kanonen nach Tier VII zur Gneisenau passen). Ich habe so ein wenig das Gefühl das man die BB Schwemme bekämpfen möchte indem man einfach BB als Kreuzer klassifiziert. --> Problem auf dem "Papier" gelöst. Die normalen Kreuzer machen sicher Freudensprünge...

Usually not. WG sometimes gives hints what will come next, especially new stuff.

So ganz alt sind die nicht. Die wurden Ende der 30er neu entwickelt. Das finale Design hatte aber die Bismarck Kanonen.

I do not know if I like that. It was the preliminary and not the final design of the ship. Armowise and especially with the guns of the final design, it would make a good battlecruiser for the russian BB tree or just as a premium.