ghostbuster_

And why is that? Its obvious that tier 1s dont have any chance against tier 3s or 4s on the other hand, tier 8s can very much perform well against tier 10s. Same goes for tier 7s against 9s.

Oh yes. Im not sure if it was 13,8 but it was way shorter than detection range. It was a real joy playing this thing against tier 10s.

Nah +/- 2 ist just fine. +/- 4 was too much tho.

I remember playing fuso against yamatos or montanas. Wasnt that fun.

Thats how they do in kindergarten

I needed 2 games to unlock tier 4 Btw. Did you notice something? Those are all russian ships? I think its just coincidence, right? There is no russian bias at all. Its not like they have the best radar in game, or stupidly accurate ships, or most tanky ships, or ships with BB size but light cruiser detection, or stupidly strong pen with rail guns. Its not like there is a ship named smolensk. Oh wait.. Btw. How can i be sure that subs are not final or far away from being final? Do you know that? Because russian one was the worst one among them.

Probably. But another reason is that most players sail full broadside with that ship and get deleted anyway. I cant decide which one is more OP in their tiers. Pyotr or Knyaz Suvorov. The glorious tier 3 which can tank yamato better than most tier 10 ships.

The relaxing tone of balance. dont you agree comrade?

Making team size smaller makes skill requirement lower since you have less enemies you need to keep an eye on. Imo team size should be bigger. Like 15v15 or 18v18. But wows still dont have enough players for bigger teams.

"Needs buff" in other words: "too much glue"

GC? Did you forget about the true naval legend in tier 5? Pyotr Velikiy. Stupidly accurate for tier 5, stupidly tanky for tier 5. When i play a tier 7 ship, she is literally the only tier 5 BB i respect.

True, BBs dont have that requirement and they are much easier to play. Thats why BBs are the most populated class in this game. Putting skilled and good BB players aside ofc. A good BB players impact to battle is really high.

They wont understand it. They were the ones who didnt spec for AA, got baited to use def AA every single time and also didnt know how to dodge. All they cared about was their glue.

"Can we expect good play from Cruisers/DD players?" @DFens_666 DDs and Cruisers, esp. radar cruisers like dm or worcester require some functional brain cells to be decent in them. If you consider 95% of players dont have that, you are gonna have your answer.

You are telling a thunderer player to get close? What heresy is this!? How are they gonna eat their glue if they come close?

Wrong. What georgia can pen, thunderer can pen aswell. And you cant overmatch the bows of those BBs with georgia. And you are right about one thing tho: You are definitely no expert.

Have you ever considered that you can actually punish the broadside of BBs with AP aswell? Or is this too advanced for you to think?

Dude if you call thunderer AP bad, it only means you cant aim. Unlike HE, you need to be able to aim to get good results with AP afterall.

Nah, after your op, i dont think there is a way for you not to be hopeless.

Wrong. Many i know speced for AA. Me inclueded. The reason for specing AA was obvious. I was rewarded by being able to defend myself and my teammates. Right now, i dont spec AA since its useless anyway.

HE spamming thunderer complaining about fire chance. playerbase is truely hopeless.

Good old AA in RTS times when it was actually usefull. Good times good times

Sure... i would rather say the relation between a brick and a skull.

Well well well look at this one. You finally understood what i was telling you. Good job! It took you only 2 years to understand it.

Exactly. From close range you can only citadel her if she is angled and if you manage to hit the plating right in front of the first turret. If she is full broadside, you can get big pen damage but you cant citadel her.