ghostbuster_

Oh what a inconvenience for the CV player! One planes turns to yellow or gets killed. CV players gotta really suffer because of this. How dare does a plane turns yellow. @wg do you hear this? Nerf the AA come on now. Jesus

alaska, musashi and georgia can be bought with ingame currency. other words: they are free to get. mogador is a tech tree ship. she is also free to get. i mean i dont support them to ban some ships in competitive gamemod. Banning some ships does mean that wg accepts that those ships are not well balanced.

@YabbaCoe if there is one, when is the next sub test? or did you gather enough data to squeeze them into radoms?

he needed more glue to shut up. did you give him some?

you have 20k battles and you think this is a bug jesus how? how can you manage not to learn anything after thousands of hours you spent playing this game?

let me start with this, i quite dislike his streams to be honest. and i dont usually agree with the way he plays the game. but his commentary about general gameplay, ships and tournements is quite good tho. this means he has a good understanding of the game. you gotta give him that. the thing is: WG had that "convenient" reason for ages. the timing is interesting. i mean, it doesnt affect WG, i doesnt affect flamu either. there is no problem about him being kicked. the annoying part here is the sh.t .ss bullcrap exuses/arguments WG uses. (like they always do.) edit: see the classic mrconway post in previous pages.

well, he became much calmer in last few years. before that, he was way more toxic than he is now. if that was the reason, he would have been kicked from CC program like ages ago. but instead, he has been invited to all CC gatherings, casted KoTs officialy etc. yeah, him being toxic is really the reason for it...

That "chip" damage like lets say 4-5k on a DD which is within the AA range of allied ships, is not a chip damage at all. 4-5k on a DD matters a LOT. Even on BBs like that chip damage you are talking about is around 20k with couple of fires. What a chip damage you got there. Rewarded by 20k altough the CV player made a dumb target choice. If you start a discussion with an offensive attitude like "omg how often bla bla bla" you cant expect the discussion to stay civil, can you?

What? I pull it out? ffs look at the thread's name. Are you aware of in which topic you are posting? "Revert CV rework" ringing any bells yet? Nope wrong. Ok i dont belive you are goj g to understand it but lets try one more time. Since reworked CV can deal more damage in the same time with RTS one, it would work with reworked CVs too. That big alpha or DoT. Doesnt matter which. In the same time reworked CV can pull out more damage. They do. thats why we leave personal tastes out of the discussion. So, you just started not to care or what? Because you said you feel sorry because of an attitude on a video game's forum.

This was the case with RTS CVs. That was one of the skill part. You needed to choose your targets wisely. You had to play patient if a map was covered up with 2-3 AA ships. You needed to wait and punish the mistakes while fighting the enemy CV ofc. It wasnt like this completely dumbed down, strike, take off, strike, take off routine. Nope, there was tactic involved. Well for some, new "action" gameplay of CVs is boring af.

But the thing is, you needed to have one ship sailing alone to do that. AA ranges were greater and AA was so much more powerful. It wasnt like you could dev strike a BB when there were an other 2 ships around. I would like to see people try to kill a 2k hp yamato with rts cvs while there were a dm and mino around. Or a mino and a grozovoi. Or one worcester. Right now you can fly in and kill it. Because you know, for some stupid .ss reason, you can always get first drop off. Doesnt matter how many ships are around. With rts, you would have lost all your planes if you did something that dumb.

Wrong. How many times should it be proven for you to understand it. Training room, AA off. Reworked CV can kill a BB faster than rts CV could. Being able to protect youself and allies within your AA range in a so called AA ship, If you spec for it. Thats decent for me. If only you knew how i feel about you.

Omg how many times do we have to explain for the thick skulls to get it? Alpha being stronger doesnt mean anything if you put out more damage with new CVs in the same time. Only reason for rework was the popularity. CVs required some skill and had counters, so the potatoes who play CVs today, didnt play back then because they were incapable to keep AA ranges in mind and learn few fighter management tricks. And those same potetos stoped playing CVs again when WG buffed AA just a bit to decent levels. After that we got a nerf hammer to AA. Got it? Or still too advanced for you to understand?

Back than they had at least some sort of counterplay. AA was much more powerful if you speced for it. Many people seem to have no clue at all.

The sad part is: almost 52k battles and he is still learning.

Anyone with few funtional brain cells can see that, CVs still have the highiest impact to the game just by looking at good CV players statts. But who i am even talking to..

That couple of new numbers you mean is massive AA nerf btw. Potatoes couldnt manage with somehow decent AA, just like mentioned in video cv numbers started to go down. It went way below pre rework numbers. So, wg decided to nerf AA to the ground. Thats your couple of numbers. Right there. Some minor changes to those where AA got butchered. Omg impact of CVs must have gotten much lower. To do this, you must be ecucated yourself and have a clue what you are talking about. But thats not the case with you.

Indeed. We got bunch of AA nerfs since then.

I saw this video for first time. God its golden. The post from WG is hilarious. They dont even hide it. Kinda curious about what dear WG EU employees would do. I mean i can somewhat predict. First they would ofc start telling us some bullcrap and then some fairytales and then some more bullcrap about spreadsheets and than some stories about how successfull CV rework was bla bla bla.

dont get me wrong tho, i got everything in the game so no need at all to spend money. and i get enough premium time from free containers. but if people pay for the game, they are gonna demand things, since paying money makes them customers. also from wg pov. they need to satify customers who are paying to the game. because its not a game which drags many new people. its a game which has a specific player profile. thats why they need to keep these players. just imagine being a new player to this game. imagine you started to game and you are grinding your first tier 3-4 ship. i dont see myself to keep playing for long. so those low tier experiences doesnt help to get new players either. anyway thats a bit off the topic.

Nah, paying for the game doesnt make them hypocrites. It makes them customers. If they didnt spend any money, they wouldnt care about the state of the game at all and they would stop playing. But obviously they have interest to naval warfare, they spend money for their interest and they get sh.t on by WG. Thats the problem. Thats why they care about the bullsh.t decisions. Btw. I must add that this is the best game about that. Sad but true. Me personly wouldnt think twice and uninstall wows and start to that other game, if there was a game comparable to wows.

Are you sure about that? I have seen plenty of people who dislike ocean. Ofc you dont have do everything players say. Noone expects you to do so. But you dont do anything what players say, nothing at all. Thats the problem. How many people did tell you that CVs need more testing and they are not ready for live server? How many times did you hear that? I know for a fact that so many times you heard this. But still you introduced them into live server... we all know what happened next. People had to play against unfinished and unbalanced CVs for months. (They are still unfinished and unbalanced tho.) How many times did you hear that captain rework is just bad? How many peopledid warn you about dead eye? We all know what happened next. I can give so many examples in last 5 years but i know its not gonna change anything and you are gonna keep telling us how WG listens to player feedback. So, no need for me to waste my breath. "this game is still actractive after each update" So, you are aware of that you (WG) need to do things to keep the game actractive. Then, why do you (again WG) look like you are trying to do complete opposite? Because in last 3 years, the game has been getting more inactractive with each update. Well thanks for that but i know exactly whats going to happen. Spoiler: nothing.

Some players? You mean at least 90% of players. You are aware of this, right? There we go. This is the ignorance from WG, we are used to. I didnt see a single possitive feedback about Epicenter yet. I didnt meet single person who wants Epicenter in the game, but its gonna stay in the game. Yeah, WG listeans to player feedbacks. Well since you asked, this blizzard on epicenter has to go imo. I wont even bother to explain why. Im know for sure whats going to happen.

love it when WG looks like they actually care. For how many years have you been getting feedback about epicenter? please tell us. ever since you introduced it into the game maybe? so, you gotta have enough feedback about this.

what? he has been a CC for a long time.