ghostbuster_

that sounds like a personal issue. it doesnt mean izmail is weak or bad.

- you and i know that there would be people who wont be able to do even that. i mean how many times do we see dm players who asks the hilarious question in chat: "what is radar?" i dont mean the ones who troll ofc. - hilariously broken. thats the answer. - not OP but easy af and too rewarding. that was the reason for me grinding shima and dev striking ships which i didnt even see just by torping the general enemy direction. im pretty sure minekaze got an extra change. am I a Bb player? lol nice joke.

who says that you need to use all of your turrets while someone is aiming for you? you might aswell keep your angle and use the turrets you can use. having a central turret doesnt mean you have to use it every single time you shoot and show broadside while doing that.

- again fundamental issue of taking all players into consideration while balancing things. if you do that, no ship would be OP in a long run because at least 90% of playersbase is very special. - again. the same mistake. what does she make a good or very good players then? - oh she has always been considered OP. back then when minekaze was same with kamikaze, minekaze was also OP. there was a reason why she got nerfed. WG didnt nerf the same OP ship just because its a premium.

so let me get this straight. - you were well aware of risks of introducing deadeye into game. - you ignored every feedback and introduced that skill without any change. - almost everyone speced it because as you know, its just too broken for not to spec. - you noticed that it became a must have for BBs and its just broken. you acknowladged the issue and you are gonna rework the skill. - and yet you are not sure if we are gonna have free respec or not. so, basicly you introduced a stupidly broken must have skill. let everyone spec for it. and its possible that players wont get the chance to respec for free but have to pay or use resources for a mistake WG did. omg. this would be to much of a d.ck move. even for WG standards.

ehm im sorry but this can only depend on you not knowing how to play the ship. only thing you should do is not showing broadside. thats it.

So you acknowladge that we have OP ships in the game. Aaand what are you gonna do about those?

Again fundamental issue with checking general ship stats. If you introduced a ship with the power of killing entire enemy team with one left mouse click, there would be people who would fail to do that before they die. So nope, smolensk is op af. Oh she is. She is straight up broken. Her firepower is amazing. Hydro smoke and radsr combo is just too much. Any good player would tell you the same. Ok. Kamikaze is not op sure she is literally one of the most broken ship we havr ever seen in wows if not the most broken one.

since you admit its a must have, we can say that we are gonna get free respec when it gets changed or removed, right?

because you are very sensitive and carefull about not to release OP ships, right? like smolensk has never been released, belfast is perfectly fine and kamikaze is UP, sky is pink and ocean is yellow.

there have been tons of feedback before you implemented this skill. risks? you knew the risk? well then why did you implement it? which ship did you plan to sell with this? nope. if the change is broken or stupid or even worse than that, ofc the voice is gonna be negative. but i dont remember any negative reactions to changes for conqueror for example. i mean giving her an actual citadel. (it was kinda late tho. we gave this feedback years ago and it took only almost 2 years for wg to gather enough data....) what did you expect? seriously, how did you imagine this skill affecting the game? tell us please. im curious about the fairytale we are gonna hear this time.

they might be trying to "balance" russian subs. because the russian one was the worst among them in tests. I bet they will try giving radar to russian subs. Or they have already tried that but we dont know about it. @YabbaCoe accurate? or, what is the reason of that silence?

Ehm what? I can rush a musashi (bias icebreaker) and blap him by making a drive by. She cant do anything because i laugh at her puny 460mm shells. This is just dumb. Her survival capabilities are extremly good. Too good. It takes ages to kill a sinop if the player isnt complete potato.

her armor neerds to be nerfed, not the dispersion. dispersion nerf is also welcome ofc but not even close to being enough.

why is noone talking about other russian BBs at all? tier 3-4-5-6 they all have stupid armor sheme. tier 3 one can tank a freaking yamato like im sorry what

did it change the fact sinop being superior to other tier 7 BBs? nope. was the feedback nerfing her sigma? nope. so, they didnt do anything based on feedback.

Is it based on feedback tho? Are you sure about that. Because about dead-eye there were tons of feedback before it hit the live sever. We all know this chance is not based on feedback. Well atlanta range buff was kinda obvious. I mean its a premium which got hit by rework.

well, i guess we all missed those changes which was made based on player feedback. interesting. enlighten us maybe? (im talking about balance changes. not unnecessary features added based on feedback)

that second bird is impossible to hit even with 100 rocks. we have been trying to tell WG how stupidly OP sinop is in comparison to other tier 7 BBs but we all know what their response was. you are just wasting your breathe. am i right? @YabbaCoe

dont go that path dude. because if you do, every other tier 7 BB looks kinda pointless in comparison to sin-OP. besides you shall not compare other nations' puny BBs with mother Russia's BBs, which were produced by using great Russian Stalinium steel and which were the strongest ships in the history.

so even if a premium ship is too strong for its tier, you are not gonna chage its tier just because it is a premium. thats why belfast is still tier 7 although she could perform perfectly fine even as tier 9. you dont move premium ships' tier, you dont nerf or buff them after release, you dont listen to feedback from testers either. what a great balancing strategy you have right there.

If you make nelson tier 8, you gotta make sinop tier 9. Seriously, nelson is pretty sh.t. how can you even think her being tier 8?

and the point of this post being? i said that spacing amagi for secondaries is questionable but specing her for deadeye is pretty good.

not really. imo specing amagi for secondaries is questionable. but deadeye, oh my oh my. tried it and ofc once more i figured it out how dumb this skill is.

she is worse than any other t6 BB. SAP is kinda useless. i dont see any reason for switching to SAP. if a ship gets spotted in your detection range, with other words, if your deadeye gets inactive, dispersion becomes really bad. armor is pretty good but then again her HP pool is kinda low. in general, i really dont see any reason to keep her in port and to play her time to time.