-
Content Сount
4,996 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
21881 -
Clan
[OM]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by ghostbuster_
-
OP: https://images.app.goo.gl/fTYVMmAr6D778oaP9
-
There is NO need to play ranked/CW as WG is nerfing steel ships
ghostbuster_ replied to luokailk's topic in General Discussion
Because you play ranked or clan battles, it doesnt mean that you should be able to get OP ships. Anything which isnt well balanced should be nerfed even if people payed a million dollars do get that ship. Which is dumb. Premium ships should be nerfed if they are not balanced. Which feature did wg actually take away? Those are some minor nerfs and to be hinest wont affect the ships that much. Yes, i have some of those OP ships and i still do think they should be nerfed. Starting with smolensk thunderer and jean bart. Than continue with lenin and belfast. -
"We've changed the characteristics of several ships, including special ships Thunderer and Stalingrad, having analyzed their combat performance and taken player feedback into account. " And then 1.3 km nerf to thunderers range. Big uff. Im sure thats gonna make a huge difference.
-
If they did right thing for all sides, noone would complain. Back then, when we didnt have all that bullcrap people didnt complain. Sure there were people who complained but they werent that many and they didnt care about anything they just wanted to complain. But ofc you are here just to oppose
-
Which only shows WG lost the grip.
-
Im sorry but this only shows and proves that WG became lazier when it comes to special events. We had an entire game mod for april fools bach then. Remember that bath tube battles? And now you are using an old model and making a video which is neither interesting nor funny. Cheap.
-
Is secondary skills getting a rework as well?
ghostbuster_ replied to OldschoolGaming_YouTube's topic in General Discussion
Yeah, that skill gotta be a joke. Seriously, i dont believe that the guys who came up with those skill ideas ever played the game. -
Is secondary skills getting a rework as well?
ghostbuster_ replied to OldschoolGaming_YouTube's topic in General Discussion
It does stack with asm1 tho. Its not like "if you have asm1, dead eye doesnt work or the other way around". This leads BBs having stupidly good dispersion. Both. The condition doesnt make any sense and the gameplay it encourages is also just beyond bad. BBs also dont need more accurate guns. They are already way too accurate. Nope. As i said, buffing BB accuracy is a no go anyway. -
Is secondary skills getting a rework as well?
ghostbuster_ replied to OldschoolGaming_YouTube's topic in General Discussion
independently from other skills, there is no way you can justify having a skill like dead eye in the game. i could somehow understand if it gave better accuracy when there are multiple spotted ships in your base detection range. even then it would be too strong because BBs are already powerful enough. there is no need to buff them. but the way it is, its just dumb. -
Is secondary skills getting a rework as well?
ghostbuster_ replied to OldschoolGaming_YouTube's topic in General Discussion
You can get fire prevention, concealment expert and dead eye in the same time. I dont know what you're trying to say here. Even if secondaries didnt get nerfed, dead eye would still be the only valuable chioce. -
if I think about all the things WG did in last years despite all the feedback, i wouldnt be suprised to be honest. -CV rework -Butchering AA -Introducing smolensk ("playing against ships with smoke and rapid HE firing guns is an unfun experience." guess whose words those were?) -porto rico fiasco (seriously those missions... god damn those were more like a joke than this CV.) -NTC aka RB -Introducing slava -Introducing thunderer -Captain rework -even considering to introduce dead eye -Sub test fiascos etc. should i continue with the list? edit: wait how did i forget the new russian cruisers. basicly a BB with light cruiser concealment akka petro and "light" cruiser nevsky.
-
Is secondary skills getting a rework as well?
ghostbuster_ replied to OldschoolGaming_YouTube's topic in General Discussion
so, there is nothing wrong with me hitting 8 out of 9 shells from like 24km with a BB? sure, this skill is perfectly fine. such a variety aswell... yeah i would definitely skip the ability of getting insane accuracy and spec something else... -
Are we actually getting deadeye rework?
ghostbuster_ replied to leonport's topic in General Discussion
im sure its gonna be introducing a new tier 10 premium CV -
Are we actually getting deadeye rework?
ghostbuster_ replied to leonport's topic in General Discussion
why would you overcomplicate it... all you gotta do is: -just give people free respec -delete that skill. thats it. -
"Your gift couldn't delivered, because we don't have your smartphone number, so hurry up and give it to us..."
ghostbuster_ replied to Deckeru_Maiku's topic in General Discussion
If that guy didnt enjoy the game and stoped playing back in 2018, there is absolutely no way he is gonna enjoy the game right now. Game balance got slaughtered since then. So, yeah everyone have their stuff they like, ofc. Someone who disliked the game back then has absolutly no reason to like it right now. -
Let's get back to the sky aiming for one moment, shall we?!
ghostbuster_ replied to FixCVs_Nautical_Metaphor's topic in General Discussion
Investigate? If you are gonna investigate this / gather data about it like you did with conqueror back then, we have a problem here. Because it took you only 2 years to get enough data about conq. And i can glady help you. Start the game, click the battle button, shoot some ships and see the bug. Or you can turn on a wows dtream, watch it and see the bug. -
"Your gift couldn't delivered, because we don't have your smartphone number, so hurry up and give it to us..."
ghostbuster_ replied to Deckeru_Maiku's topic in General Discussion
Imagine being the guy who stoped playing for some reason back in 2018. Is there any chance him to start playing again in 2021 with this new state of the game? Let me answer this for you, nope. Absolutely no chance. -
Let's get back to the sky aiming for one moment, shall we?!
ghostbuster_ replied to FixCVs_Nautical_Metaphor's topic in General Discussion
Talking about known bugs, what about "shells falling short" bug? It has been ages and its still there. -
Let's get back to the sky aiming for one moment, shall we?!
ghostbuster_ replied to FixCVs_Nautical_Metaphor's topic in General Discussion
are you sure? dont you want to gather some more data before confirming it? maybe it doesnt give any advantages? you made the dot on the minimap legal afterall. -
World of warships, thinking mens action game. Cool story. 1. Not many. AA is useless as. Even if few get shot down, no worries, you have crap ton of planes. 2. Doesnt matter. You can always turn away. Even worcester cant suprise you and shoot your planes down before you get out of its AA range. 3. Doesnt matter if it gets near another ship or not. AA is useless. Besides, it cant get far considering the stupid speed of planes. 4. Honestly, you gotta think about this in any class. So, nothing special for CVs. 5 and 6. To kill them? They are just DDs. 7. There is not such a ship in the game which might cause trouble to CV. Those days are long gone. 8. I can answer this without even seeing the MM. Sh.t 9. Any class have the same problem. 10. Doesnt matter you can use any plane type on and class. Omg. So much thinking... WG should dumb down the gameplay a bit more. Avrg Joe's brain might get overheated.
- 32 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- aircraft carrier
- dd
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Let's get back to the sky aiming for one moment, shall we?!
ghostbuster_ replied to FixCVs_Nautical_Metaphor's topic in General Discussion
to be honest i am suprised that a WG employee confirmed a serious bug. what is going on there? dont you have new premium ships to pump out? -
I have already told you why they wouldnt fit into randoms. Wanna tell us why they would fit into randoms and how? I called the issue here. Wanna give a counter argument or an argument to support your own claim? Or are tou juat gonna keep repeating the same thing ober and over again? Who is talking about realistic like what? This game has nothing to do with being realistic its not even close. If it was realistic, i would say that subs fit into game perfectly. But this is an arcade game. Far away from being realistic. Nope, like i said, i would like to have them. Then you have only met potato subs. I played all tests. And i have been sunk by a DD only once. I couldnt count how many DDs i killed and the problem wasnt how many DDs i killed. It was how easy i killed them. Are you a WG employee? How do you know wgs intentions? Why do you think they have been really quite about subs? They are aware that subs are not a good fit into randoms. Ptherwise they would have already introduced them. It would be a seperate gamemod where the only goal would be attacking and defending convoys. You are talking about a gamemode like randoms but without certain classes. These two are completely different. Why would i participate in all tests of subs if i dont want to play them. Again this is an arcade game and there should be a balancing. Introducing a broken class just because CVs are broken wont solve anything since subs are not gonna fight only CVs. They are gonna make life like hell for DDs. Thats the problem. CVs wont be affecfed at all. Oh sh.t really? Nope, my suggestion would only force CV players to use few brain cells. They would have to think before picking right targets instead of flying into AA of 3-4 ships and striking which ever they want. We had that. For a short time. AA kinda worked. Good CV plahers was able to perform good but the potafoes stoped playing because it was too complicated for them to think before striking. I really dont know whats that hard to understand. Ok lets do this like teaching a 4 years old kid. Whats DDs one and only advantage over other classes? Tell me that first and we will go on from there. Radar has cooldown, radar has duration. Sub can sail into cap, sit there and DDs is not gonna be able to come close because its gonna be spotted as long as sub stays there while launcinh homing torpedos. So yeah subs are much bigger danger to DDs thatn radar is. Maybe only for someone who cant track the cooldown status of enemy radar ship, who cant bait the radar and who doesnt look at minimap and get caught by a radarship. Yeah maybe. But not to a DD plauers with couple of brain cells. What? Reason for what? Im sorry but this is one of the dumbest things i have ever heard. "Subs counter CVs" [edited]. Tell us, how exactly they counter CVs? Oh i have no chance in WG because i cant tell such [edited] fairytales dude. Im not that invertebrate. Thats being you. I have been telling you the reasonin behind my claim which is subs dont fit into randoms or any sort of competitive mode. whats your reasoning?
-
and what does this mean to WG? i mean the history part? spoiler:nothing. they made a "naval legend" video for soyuz...
-
Win is a win. Its always better than a defeat. Even if its a defeat with 500k damage.
-
And have you ever thought why? not because they dont want to play them or they have something personal against subs. Subs dont fit into randoms. We have seen this even in tests with half of the team being bots. Exactly. Subs are hilariously broken against DDs. Why? A well designed scenario would work perfectly fine. Im talking about a PvP scenario. Why shouldnt i want subs in randoms if they were balanced? I would love to play them but they fundamentaly dont fit into random or any sort of competitive mod in this game. So, add another broken class to balance other broken class great logic right there. And the solution is easy. Make the AA somewhat usefull so that people can defend theirselfs and teammates if they choose to spec for AA. Starting with making AA ranges longer like they were before CV rework. And what use DD are gonna have then? You are taking their only advantage which is concealment. DD can play around radar with no problem. Subs are gonna cause much bigger problem for DDs. Nope they wont. It will only create another class which has very little to no counter. if you can say this with a straight face, maybe you should apply to WG. They need such people who can say this kind of bullcrap with a straight face.
