Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

ghostbuster_

Players
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content Сount

    4,996

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    21881

  • Clan

    [OM]

Everything posted by ghostbuster_

  1. ghostbuster_

    Abusive Chat ban

    ghostbuster_ replied to necrolineage's topic in General Discussion

    punished how exactly? got pink for couple of battles? much wow what a punishment. receiving chat ban is much bigger punishment than getting pink.
  2. ghostbuster_
    automatic compensation can be overlooked? seriously now? automatic compensation cant be overlooked because all the player has to do is logging in and he would get the container. Manual one on the other hand can be overlooked since you have to go to article and click a button first to get compensation. automatic starts whenever the player opens the container. and yes it was a secret button. do you really think all players read the articles which are shared in the game? i wonder when you are gonna get this. it isnt about size of the compensation. this is about the collection method of the compensation.
  3. ghostbuster_

    Unsportsmenlike behaviour problem (edited*)

    ghostbuster_ replied to Rage_Unchained's topic in General Discussion

    sherlock? is that you? i mean, didnt meet one on reddit or something.
  4. ghostbuster_

    Unsportsmenlike behaviour problem (edited*)

    ghostbuster_ replied to Rage_Unchained's topic in General Discussion

    oh really? i didnt meet one yet. couldnt agree more
  5. ghostbuster_
    what? im sorry but this isnt an excuse. really not. do you give us 1 hour premium for 1 hour power shortage in EU? i think you give us one day, right? so why do we have to find this one day compensaton? why cant we get it automaticly once we log into the game? the point here, regardless of the server downtime duration, in NA you get compensations automaticly. here, we need to click some articles to see the super secret "claim" button.
  6. ghostbuster_

    Unsportsmenlike behaviour problem (edited*)

    ghostbuster_ replied to Rage_Unchained's topic in General Discussion

    agree on this one. But WG to do this, they need to take action first and punish such behaviours. I really dont believe that anyone ever got perma banned from wows.
  7. ghostbuster_

    Unsportsmenlike behaviour problem (edited*)

    ghostbuster_ replied to Rage_Unchained's topic in General Discussion

    there is a easy solution. since he has been doing this over and over again, give him an orange status for like 500 games. and if he does this after 500 battles again, give him another 800. why does it take so long to take an action about such issues? if we type "d.mb" in chat, we instantly get chatban. but this guy is able to rig battle after battle.
  8. ghostbuster_

    Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance

    ghostbuster_ replied to Excavatus's topic in General Discussion

    just a question, how long did it take you to create this post? how long did you think? next time, dont push your limits that much. you might burn your hardware.
  9. ghostbuster_
    Is there a super secret compensation which i missed? i wouldnt be suprised if WG EU encrypted the notes which "announce" the compensations.
  10. ghostbuster_
    I didnt do it. But if they add some new broke leg mods like yamatos or dms, i might grind for it. because those 2 dont add diversity to these ships, they make them simply much better.
  11. ghostbuster_

    Blapping CVs with Yama/Musashi: spotting plane

    ghostbuster_ replied to RamboCras's topic in General Discussion

    Dev striking CVs with any ship ist the most satisfying thing.
  12. ghostbuster_

    Blapping CVs with Yama/Musashi: spotting plane

    ghostbuster_ replied to RamboCras's topic in General Discussion

    If they play normal, sure it can be ok. Although im not a fan of a div with 2 BBs. But that guy was claiming that enemy CV can be killed pretty fast. Thats why i assumed that div focuses on killing CV.
  13. ghostbuster_

    Blapping CVs with Yama/Musashi: spotting plane

    ghostbuster_ replied to RamboCras's topic in General Discussion

    If you really think that 899 is a reliable tactic, well there is nothing left to say. If CV doesnt showcase a sitting duck, it would take long enough for 899 div to be useless and lose the battle.
  14. ghostbuster_

    Buff Zao and GK turret angles.

    ghostbuster_ replied to Sweedish_Gunner's topic in General Discussion

    I dont know what you are talking about. I see montanas everyday. Not much but this doesnt mean she is weak. I dont play smolensk that often. I dont play nevsky that much. I dont play thunderer/conqueror that much either. I dont play georgia/repu/massa that much either. Just checked. I played montana once in last 130 battles. And it shows that i didnt have problems with dealing damage. Pretty ok result i got with her.
  15. ghostbuster_

    Italian BBs

    ghostbuster_ replied to RenamedUser_92906789's topic in General Discussion

    exactly that one. i did only 20 battles with her. it was enough to unlock the tier 8 one. but i kept that ship. btw. i was playing with dead eye. without it, i can imagine how bad dispersion would be.
  16. ghostbuster_

    Italian BBs

    ghostbuster_ replied to RenamedUser_92906789's topic in General Discussion

    I loved the tier 7 one. She is such a strong ship once you skip sap and use ap. Yesterday i bought the tier 8 one. She seemed ok for now. But again did only 3 battles with her.
  17. ghostbuster_

    No more rewards for achievements after 0.10.4

    ghostbuster_ replied to SodaBubbles's topic in General Discussion

    We will see. In long run, i can see them removing leg. modules from NTC and adding them to auctions. Has anyone wondered if ships like kitakami will be available again? Isnt auctions perfekt for that? And that guy here still tells us fairytales about the chance of there being no ships at all.
  18. ghostbuster_

    No more rewards for achievements after 0.10.4

    ghostbuster_ replied to SodaBubbles's topic in General Discussion

    We all know which. Ships which are not available anymore. Every single one of them. Even OP ones i mean "too popular" ones. So, therr is no need for you to tell players. Its obvious.
  19. ghostbuster_

    No more rewards for achievements after 0.10.4

    ghostbuster_ replied to SodaBubbles's topic in General Discussion

    I wish it was that innocent... So, there wont removed ships for sale? There wont be ships like missorui, smolensk, kamikaze, smaland etc. Im sure there will. Why not milk whales who are ready to pay hundreds of euros for those ships? At least dont make any comment. You look funny when you try to justify such things.
  20. ghostbuster_

    Buff Zao and GK turret angles.

    ghostbuster_ replied to Sweedish_Gunner's topic in General Discussion

    And this means she needs a buff? Well, look for other targets or load HE if you dont have any other targets or go for upper bow? Why dont i have any issues with montana?
  21. ghostbuster_

    Buff Zao and GK turret angles.

    ghostbuster_ replied to Sweedish_Gunner's topic in General Discussion

    Montana nerfed? She is still a very solid ship... what are you talking about?
  22. ghostbuster_

    Buff Zao and GK turret angles.

    ghostbuster_ replied to Sweedish_Gunner's topic in General Discussion

    Why? Gk already has great turret angles when disengaging. Besides she is already a strong ship. Why buffing her? There is absolutely no need for that.
  23. ghostbuster_

    General CV related discussions.

    ghostbuster_ replied to Excavatus's topic in General Discussion

    AA doesnt do jacksht. Thats the problem.
  24. ghostbuster_

    Your Top Ships for each Class

    ghostbuster_ replied to Ocsimano18's topic in General Discussion

    top WR, min 50 battles. kamikaze and belfast lol. coinsidence?
  25. ghostbuster_

    No more rewards for achievements after 0.10.4

    ghostbuster_ replied to SodaBubbles's topic in General Discussion

    You really wonder what playerbase think of your new way of milking the very same playerbase?
×