Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

ghostbuster_

Players
  • Content Сount

    4,996
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    21881
  • Clan

    [OM]

Everything posted by ghostbuster_

  1. ghostbuster_

    Unsportsmenlike behaviour problem (edited*)

    Of you are still repeating your "just a bad play" thing... nvm.
  2. ghostbuster_

    Unsportsmenlike behaviour problem (edited*)

    So much about sanctions. That wortless cr.p is already able to log in... Today 3 battles with 121 pr and 33% wr. @YabbaCoe gotta love the way how WG deals with things like this sht.
  3. ghostbuster_

    Importance of sample-size and WR

    This some big nonsense right there. Random is random. Claiming that some people are just more lucky and thats why they get better wr is a very common complete utter potato excuse.
  4. ghostbuster_

    Unsportsmenlike behaviour problem (edited*)

    No, he didnt do his task not even close. If you really believe how he played was doing his task, i dont know what to tell you. You didnt see the end score btw. He didnt do jacksht. You are really pushing it tho. Who said you have to fight only your clan mates if you have them in enemy team? Show me where and who said that. Jesus. but if you dont play properly and dont bother even to spot your clan mates just because you are from the same clan, thats rigging. I got it. WG doesnt care about rigging at all. At least dont pretent like you do. If i rigged every single battle and you wounldnt be able to do a damn thing about it. You are really good with chat bans tho. I gotta give you that. Edit: no wonder why we get op ships or ridiculous features/skills etc. "He was doing his tasks" ... if other wg employees think like that aswell, there is really nothing to be suprised of after seeing a skill like deadeye or ship like thunderer. This is the CS respond: "Thank you for contacting Wargaming Player Support. We appreciate your concerns and interest in the improvement of the game. We took appropriate measures according to our game rules and punishment instructions. Unfortunately, we cannot disclose the exact measures we took due to the protection of data privacy. We appreciate your understanding. However, we assure you that violations of the Game Rules are met with appropriate sanctions. We hope your next battles are far more pleasant and you have a great time in-game. Thank you for your patience and time." Ofc i dont believe there is any sort of sanction...
  5. ghostbuster_

    Unsportsmenlike behaviour problem (edited*)

    idk. dont you have a super secret spreadsheet for that too? i mean after all you have spreadsheets which say people are having fun playing against CVs. you made this part loud and clear. there is no rigging just a bad gameplay.
  6. ghostbuster_

    Unsportsmenlike behaviour problem (edited*)

    and im sure they wouldnt get any sanction if they didnt admit it in chat. because according what yaba has been telling me, i can literally log in with my second account on my other PC, click battle with CVs in both accounts at the same time, and rig the battle and achieve idk 90%? wr with CVs in my main account. i wouldnt even need to launch planes since i can always go with: "i was trying to get close quarters with my cv but my dd didnt smoke me up next to the cap." this would have ment a bad gameplay since i wouldnt be afk and would be participating in the battle with my secondaries.
  7. ghostbuster_

    Unsportsmenlike behaviour problem (edited*)

    as yabba confirmed, the thing is WG cant see the rigging there. it might be just a bad gameplay. maybe he has been making bad decision of trying to use his secondaries in a CV? right @YabbaCoe ? accourding to his logic, there is no rigging but bad gameplay. so dont bother with creating tickets or something. because what you want to report might be just a bad gameplay. and just for your info. you can rig every single battle you play, and WG wont notice anything. you can always say "it was a poor decision from my side akka bad gameplay" hilarious
  8. ghostbuster_

    Unsportsmenlike behaviour problem (edited*)

    He didnt come to left flank for once after he spotted the montana which was also in the same clan with him. he left this flank long before halland was spotted. sorry but if someone pays attention to chat, ackowladges what is going on, yet still ignores, its isnt just bad play. anymore. so, you are actually saying that your only way dealing with rigging (in my exaple and the situation i had yesterday) is a CS agent watching the replay and giving his/her opinion? other words, you dont have any way to deal with rigging. i would be able to rig every day, every single battle yet you wouldnt notice a damn thing. good good. now we all know what those "necessary action taken" replies from CS actually mean. it means no action has been taken at all because we dont have a way to detect the actual rigging. it might be just a bad play. you cant be that bad in game, right? we all would shot that halland and he would be gone in no time...
  9. ghostbuster_

    Unsportsmenlike behaviour problem (edited*)

    right at the start they were spotted by him on their way to left flank. after than thas, they only got spotted when they shot as you can notice in the replay. besides halland was way far far away from those ships. so, its being "already quite a strong AA " is irrelevant. how do you distinguish actual rigging then? because this looks excatly like rigging. and rigging would like exatly like this. no, you dont. completely new pc, completely new account without any connections to my main one. you wouldnt know if i didnt want you to know. "eliminate" the sellected thread first? lol. nice one right there. ofc i would be attacking but from rear after flying in a straight line and eating every possible flak clouds. so, this wouldnt look like im rigging but making a bad decision? you really dont punish rigging in this game. what you mean happens in every single battle, every day .someone makes a worst possible decision and tries hard to lose the battle. but this isnt like this. he was well aware of whats going on. (you can see in the chat) but still he ignored his clan mate.
  10. ghostbuster_

    Unsportsmenlike behaviour problem (edited*)

    As far as i remember, halland wasnt spotted. Because the reason we knew that halland is there was my div mate getting spotted after shooting from his position which gave us the information there is a DD. And right after than that, GK took torps from the position where my div mate pinged. So, nope. He didnt do the round to spot thing. So, this is your obvious case for rigging? Omg. There is truely no punishment for rigging in this game if CS agent thinks in same way as you. Tell me then, how would you detect that i would be rigging in the example i gave. Here again, if i took CV in my second account on my second PC and clicked battle with my main one or with my clan mates at the same time and kept attacking the CV akka being useless and got reported by someone because of rigging, would you say it was CV's own decision to attack enemy CV? I would have been participated in the battle afterall. I would be attacking enemy CV. And i would have even different clan tags. Are you serious right now?
  11. ghostbuster_

    Unsportsmenlike behaviour problem (edited*)

    Rigging is also his own decision... so, if i made a click div me in my CV, told my clan mates in enemy team the locations of my teammates, didnt attack/spot my clan mates but focused on farming a BB which is irrelevant for the battle outcome, it would be ok because its my own decision to do so and because i striked that one BB? With this logic of yours, there is no punishment for rigging. Its their own decision after all. I might aswell log in with my second account on my other pc and click battle at the same time and i would be fine since i can strike couple of times with my second account akka PARTICIPATE in that battle.
  12. ghostbuster_

    Yes, another commander skill rework rant

    Sad but true. I know you were. Just wanted to clarify it for people who didnt get the sarcasm.
  13. ghostbuster_

    Yes, another commander skill rework rant

    I wouldnt be suprised if we get a ranked season with subs but without any captain skills to counter subs. Thats the behaviour i expect from WG. WG likes to tell players fairytales. They also say that smolenks is well balanced and CVs are in a fine state.
  14. ghostbuster_

    Unsportsmenlike behaviour problem (edited*)

    Not true. Not everybody. In that case, considering we didnt have any spot on that flank, anyone with few functional brain cells and without an intention of rigging would go for that DD. At least for other ships on that flank. He didnt fly there once. After halland had a free game, yeah. And he didnt even attack that halland. No clear sign of rigging... what did i expect... how can it be more obvious?
  15. ghostbuster_

    Unsportsmenlike behaviour problem (edited*)

    i met another d.head in his CV yesterday. that worthless .... was from the same clan with a DD and BB in enemy team. this d.head ignored this DD and BB whole battle. we told him DDs location, and he was paying attention to chat but he simply refused to bother that DD. This is rigging and should be something which gets you perma banned. if you have no intention playing the game, then you might aswell get banned. again @YabbaCoe, ticket ID: 131680810.
  16. ghostbuster_

    General Submarines related discussions

    Understanding how AP works is the basic of basics. Positioning and map awareness are the most important.
  17. ghostbuster_

    HELP! I can't take it...

    If your pc cant handle a game, maybe its time for you to stop playing or to buy a new one. Just saying.
  18. ghostbuster_

    Divisions Rigging in Ranked Games

    @YabbaCoe @MrConway 131680810 ticket ID. that worthless... cv. can you check?
  19. ghostbuster_

    I don't get the dev blog (CC) outrage

    goes for all classes. if you wanna be good in a class, you should learn how to play other classes. if you want to play a BB, you need to learn how to play cruisers and DDs. and the way around. if you want to play cruisers, you should learn how to play BBs and DDs.
  20. ghostbuster_

    I don't get the dev blog (CC) outrage

    they gave reload time boast as an example. yeah sure, makes perfect sence. such a realistic feature. after 5th round on the same target, crew starts to reload the guns faster because they get annoyed. its almost as realistic as might russian tech tree.
  21. ghostbuster_

    I don't get the dev blog (CC) outrage

    oh you mean the arcade crap. this is not a skill. at least not a captain skill. this is some crap anime game level of arcade feature. and definitely shouldnt be in the game.
  22. ghostbuster_

    WG its time you fix the "shells are landing short" bug

    they think it is working as intended. they dont acknowledge the issue.
  23. ghostbuster_

    I don't get the dev blog (CC) outrage

    which new skill? the one which will replace dead eye? it is completely useless and waste of points.
  24. ghostbuster_

    I don't get the dev blog (CC) outrage

    recharging batteries underwater was just stupid. there is absolutely no way to justify that. but forcing subs to surface to recharge their batteries would be a good solution. but would this be enough? nope. imo they should have given an other resource to subs. oxigen. subs should get both. battey and oxigen. they will be the second worst thing after CVs and will break game even more. if a cruiser kills a BB while kiting, it means BB fcked up. there is no other explanation. why keep chasing a kiting cruiser? why not disengaging? why not trying to drop detection and start kiting yourself? nope. this arcadey crap is not welcome at all. besides, BBs are already too damn powerful. (Im also a BB main) BBs shouldnt get any more buffs. on the contrary, most of them should get nerfed.
  25. ghostbuster_

    Hey WG i cant spot ant IT BBs? Why?

    Fair enough.
×