ghostbuster_

world of warships, thinking man's action game

it should definitely be removed since its removing the skill factor from the game. (exactly thats why wg is never gonna remove it) some ships are simply not made for close combat. without cyclone, you can influence the battle and carry hard. but if cyclone hits, there is literally nothing you can do. for example: colbert. what the heck are you gonna do once cyclone hits? you dont have the HE pen to do damage. you rely on AP on broadsides or fire damage. In a cyclone, you cant do that. so, most likely useless.

i have a second account with 98% solo wr after 28934 solo battles with avrg tier played being 10. when it comes to PR, its around 10k. avrg damage is 328k. kills per battles: 11. so, how convincing is that to you? because thats exactly how convincing you are with your hidden stats.

dont buy a premium CV yet. i assure you, by the end of the year there are gonna be an other CV line which is going to have jets. its gonna be worth to buy. save your money.

well, he had a point. why would someone even consider playing tier 9 ranked with a TRB yugumo... this is literally one of the worst choices you can make when it comes to ships. thats said, team play for CVs died with the rework. there is no AA cover. those days are long gone.

they really think that competitive clans only look at your WR... internal testing is the deciding factor for getting in or not. you can have 89% solo wr, if you dont pass the internal testing phase, you wont be in. i have seen many people getting rejected because of that.

-Not to give money to WG, a company which screws its customers over and over again. This should be the ultimate reason not to buy anything from premium shop.

I mean if you play better you get more xp and more credits.

Please stop these ... excuses. I dont use a single mod, my internet connection is solid (didnt have any connection issues) and yet i have been having that shell falling short bug in every single battle i played in last 2 years. And im not the only one.

True, but playing in div doesnt magicly make your map&situation awareness, positioning, aiming etc. better than it already is.

guys, dont forget. if you dont want to detonate, just play CVs. because you know, they cant be detonated for some stupid .ss reason.

first of all, this is not heatly. stop doing it. once you do that, we can talk about cruiser gameplay.

If someone used a fighter setup saipan, it would usually mean, that someone is an utter potato. and if you couldnt manage to outplay that guy, it would only mean that you are even a bigger potato

Wow wow hold on. CE ist a must have on any ship. If you get caught by a DD while your guns pointing to other way, it means you lack of map awareness. With map awareness, you wouldnt get into that situation. As i said, map awareness is the one of the two most important things in the entire game other being positioning. RNG depended. Cant be relied on. So, there are much more usefull skills.

that guy... For example? Which weak tech tree ships do you want to see?

And how are you gonna disengage if things doesnt work the way you imagined? You dont have concealment expert nor FP. So basicly you will remain spotted. I agree on tanking damage. But the captain build that guy showed is just bad. Nah, they can be usefull once in 10 times but like i said, you cant rely on them. If a DD sneaks up on you, your main guns are the primary tools to deal with that DD not your secondaries.

That was why i started to play RTS CVs to counter enemy CVs. I learned fighter management way before i learned how to cross torp DDs.

So, you call suiciding "risking your hp pool"? Lol. First of all, secondaries are, like the name itself says, secondaries. They are not there to be relied on. Thats why specing for secondaries is pretty useless unless you want a troll build. But in general, secondary builds are complete waste of captain points if you want to make maximum use of your ship.

Says who? There are way more complaints about new "action gameplay" CVs (you can have a meal while playing them btw. So much action(!)) than we have ever had about RTS CVs. Sheer number of complaints ist mostlikely much more than RTS ones. And i am only talking about the quantity of complaints. When we consider the quality aswell, it gets much worse.

not to forget about no fly zones before the CV rework. there were battles in which you didnt have anywhere to fly with double worcesters 2 minos and grozovoi in enemy team. if you speced into AA, you benefited from it. AA wasnt complete horsesht like it is now. i missed to park my full AA mino in the middle of the map and give my team a bubble with 8,6m radius of no fly zone. old good fun times...

i mean i didnt have to check the stats to know what kind of a player this is. someone who says the thing she said, can only be a pretty bad player. so, im not suprised. WG dudes are still hiding under the sand? isnt it hillarious that we didnt hear a single word from WG employees about airstrikes? in couple of weeks they are gonna show up and say, "we tested them, we took your feedback into consideration and we decided that its good balance." note my words.

and we wonder how a GK dies in the first 3-4 mins. like this.

we past this part long ago. if you see a thread created by that guy, you leave all expectations behind and try to prepare yourself for something worse than the worst thing you can possibly imagine. sometimes it can be mindblowing.

or you can just perform better in tier X to afford playing tier X. imo economy is way too friendly in this game.

Wait until you meet a CV.