Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

ghostbuster_

Players
  • Content Сount

    4,996
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    21881
  • Clan

    [OM]

Everything posted by ghostbuster_

  1. W...t... is simulatorish. I have already tried it but battles are just boring. I didnt hear about the second one before tho
  2. Is there a smilar game which isnt a simulator? I am personally waiting for such a game to be released.
  3. And? This game is an arcade game. Not a simulation. So, it does mean absolutely not a fcking thing what they were in reality.
  4. ghostbuster_

    Submarine Testing

    Where you fail miserably is: if you want a class to depent on the bad accuracy of other ships, you gotta make the accuracy close to how it really was. And that means pretty bad accuracy. Now this would cause some problems. Biggest of all, playing a ship with 3-4% hitrate would be extremly boring and frustrating. So, nope. Besides DDs are not even close to being a sub. Im sorry but thats one of the dumbest claims here on forum.
  5. ghostbuster_

    Meet the World of Warships Team

    that guy is the PL Community Manager? ehm ookay. btw. what happened to that suboctavian guy? @YabbaCoe
  6. ghostbuster_

    General Submarines related discussions

    hopeless. no, i didnt missunderstand it. i ignored it since it was just some more nonsense.
  7. ghostbuster_

    General Submarines related discussions

    Reality arguments has as much value as the foto i just posted. Thats an arcade game. Nothing about this game is realistic except some ship's names. Sayin "But in reality this an this happened" is nothing but bullsh.ting .
  8. ghostbuster_

    General Submarines related discussions

    do you know how much value your reality argument has when it comes to an arcade game?
  9. do you mean, were they on the field or did they actually play? i mean, they were on the field 3 times, yes. but did they play? nah, i have seen highschool teams playing better.
  10. ghostbuster_

    Submarine Testing

    i highly doubt that. The ruskies on the top are probably gonna want to see some dollars. sooo, i do not think subs are gonna be in testing for any longer. i mean, we have ranked and randoms on live server for Beta test anyway , right? @YabbaCoe
  11. ghostbuster_

    Why don't CVs fight CVs?

    because according to WG, WGs gotta have best AA in the game. btw, they were able to fight eachother before the CV rework. but potatoes got their .ss whooped by good CV players and WG decided that a little multitasking is way too complicated for the playerbase. if thats not a company calling it's players dumb dumbs, i dont know what it is.
  12. this guy gotta be the inspiration for this pic. After my vacation, first thread i took a look at and i already had enough of this guy.
  13. ghostbuster_

    Is WG pandering to DD players?

    First of all BBs are very forgiving. You can get away with mistakes. For example you can show broadside and most likely you are gonna get away with it. It wasnt like this. WG lowered the citadels some time ago. Imo All BBs should have their citadels raised to something like mino levels. Showing broadside=getting deleted like it used to be. Their range is too much. They have really good concealment and in the same time they have absurd range. No BB should have ranve more than 20 km. They are too accurate in ranges. You can delete cruisers from like 24-25 km. Their dispersion model should be reworked. Ther accuracy should drop with the distance. If you should a target at 8 km, it should be accurate. If you shoot something at 20km the dispersion should get much worse.
  14. ghostbuster_

    Is WG pandering to DD players?

    battle influence is lower than DDs or radar cruisers maybe? ringing any bells or is it too hard to understand?
  15. Daring. 10 km is more than enough and you cant fck up big time in that DD since she is way too powerfull. You cant eat torps since you have hydro. If you trade badly against other DDs, you have heal. And you also cant fck up with smoke since you have a lot of them and they are fast reloading ones aswell.
  16. ghostbuster_

    People NEED to stop reporting CV

    ok here we go. I dont expect you to understand but at least others can read this too. They could sink any ship in one go IF: -this ship was alone. (Outside of any of those big AA bubbles) -this ship didnt spec for AA. Because even izumo had good AA if you speced full AA on her. -That ship was unawere of aswd keys. -Got baited to use def AA too early (if she has one) -Enemy CV was a complete potato and didnt have any sort of fighter management. Etc. There are sh.t ton of ifs. If you were a more skilled player than the RTS CV player, there were ways to defend yourself. Right now, you dont get oneshoted. But new CVs can kill you as fast as a RTS CV could. It takes almost same amount of time. Besides new CVs dont have ifs since AA is crap, there no enemy CV to worry about etc. Besides, RTS CVs required much more multitasking. So, the argument "they fly planes they dont sail ship so, these things make perfdct sense" is nothing but a cup full of bullsh.t.
  17. ghostbuster_

    I would like a refund please, WG

    I know you understand what i mean :) Good old Omni times ^^ I'm well aware of that there are some people in WG, who see the problems as we do. For example you, corni, robin, kanne (although he doesnt work on wows anymore). And i'm also well aware that there are many other reasons behind the desicions which have been made and ofc you as an employee dont have any other option than presenting these as good stuff. What i can hope for is that the ones like you adress the issues intern and at least try to show that they are making mistakes with their desicions. Anyways. I made you spend more than enough time on forums. Again, have a nice day.
  18. ghostbuster_

    People NEED to stop reporting CV

    that guy is truely something else his performance is actually impressive, dont you think?
  19. ghostbuster_

    Is WG pandering to DD players?

    so, much for healthy discussion? i dont try to bait you into anything. if you state something, you need to take the background of these statements into account aswell. but yeah, anyway.
  20. ghostbuster_

    I would like a refund please, WG

    If you say so, so be it. But turn back and take a look. I wonder if you are still gonna be able to claim that you learned from your mistakes. Well, there are also decisions which I appreciate like removal of deadeye. but yet again, deadeye shouldnt have been in the game in the first place. Removal of BB ap on DDs. it took you like 2-3 years (maybe 4? i dont recall the exact dates) but at least you did it. ty. have a nice week too.
  21. ghostbuster_

    Is WG pandering to DD players?

    ofc im serious. and im a BB main.
  22. ghostbuster_

    Is WG pandering to DD players?

    well, whats the reason for you stating that then? those changes had to be made and they were made. although they should have been made like years ago. again, what was your point then? again your goal in stating that? they did get concealment nerf because they had and still have absurd concealment. are they classified as cruisers? yes. nah OP is probably just a BBkevin who has been complaining about DDs. i dont believe that this was his point. derailed bandwagon? you are overestimating yourself. Well you can criticize anything. but you arguments gotta make sense. BBs are the class which is easiest to play. and the complaints about BBs doesnt make any sense and they all have something in common. those always come from bad players. go figure. well, it cant provide any healty discussin since you ignore to discuss if those changes were needed or not.
  23. ghostbuster_

    Is WG pandering to DD players?

    yeah, they are way too powerfull and would be nice if they got some nerfs.
  24. ghostbuster_

    I would like a refund please, WG

    the problem is you learning not a damn thing from your mistakes. think about it.
×