ghostbuster_

Yes, i just saw that. Its very welcome and to be honest im suprised. We will see how it will play out. Apart from subs, getting a new gamemode which isnt complete arcadey crap is quite nice. Its going to be PvP. There are going to be 7 players in each team. But yes, they ignored that and they are gonna keep ignoring. Subs will be introduced in every single gamemode for sure.

And this changes the fact that ony important factor is the skill of CV player? Just because it doesnt occure that often doesnt mean its not a problem. That was the choice you had to make. Right now, its just waste of points since CV player doesnt care if he is not a total potato. Or CV can just dodge the flak and strike anyone of you two. Nah, they are as frequent as they were before the rocket nerf. Again, potato CVs yeah, against them you might stay stationary as well. They are just bad. But against good ones, good luck.

Correction: "enemy CV was pretty bad."

Seems like you failed your drop. "Yamato guns are trash! shot a montana two times, hit 3 shells for 3 overpens. Yamato guns suck." Doesnt make sense at all, does it?

Works how? Can you defend your teammate who is in your AA range? Nope. Can you defend yourself? Nope. Its not up to you or your skillbuilds. Its all about enemy CV being potato or not. You can spec every single AA skill there is to the best AA ship, if enemy CV is not a potato, you wont be able to defend yourself.

It was if you had her full AA speced.

They dont care because they dont gain much money from these low tiers. I mean even the worst player cant end up with a loss after a battle. They want as many players as possible in high tiers to sell bigger premium ships and premium time because most players are just too bad to make profit without a premium account.

"WG staff does read the forums and does collect feedback and ideas for the devs." and devs like: Edit: ok back to the topic. About subs in ranked on live server. Its LIVE server! Not the test server and it isnt meant for you to test some completely unbalanced new features/ships/classes etc. For a health testing environment try making PTS more interesting for players to invest their time . Try to encourage players to give their best.

Its actually pathetic how you try to twist the topic. There is a saying from where i come from. "Listening with your .ss". Accurate for you, really. Well you can listen him but you gotta be able to comment on things by yourself. In this video case, what he told didnt matter at all. Like i said, his only role is letting people, me included, know about that Q&A. What he said or did doesnt matter. Anyways we get it you are a special one. If you still need an explanation, pm me and give a dc adress. Here, back to the topic.

Well you can say unconstructive literally for any post you want. What you should edit? The insults etc. Btw. These posts you posted to answer us are along with our posts also off topic. Are you gonna delete these too? Thats not wrong. Show me one other platform which can be accessed by any player? Which surveys? I didnt see a mandatory ingame survey yet. Again, maybe people are sick and tired of seeing their constructive feedback thrown into junk? Constructive feedback actually takes more time than a quick rant. Considering non of the constructive feedbacks was taken into consideration by WG in last at least 3 years, why should people bother with it? Btw. Thanks to that "loud minority" you are a moderator. Dont forget it. You are either extremely naive or really new here... And how should a game developer act in this time? Maybe take the suggestions / feedbacks of experoenced players into consideration? Maybe create a heatly testing ground instead of testing it on crap like PTS? Maybe test them in a health test ground before introduce them into live server?

Classic excuse... its getting old. Ofc majority of players dont use forum. But unless WG introduces huge ingame surveys which are mandatory, forum is the only platform to judge if something is wanted or not. And why do players who are looking forward to subs, have no reason to post here? They have as many reasons as others. Well, not really. I posted many posts after BB AP changes on DDs for example although it was a very welcome change for me. Constructive feedback takes considerably longer time and it also doesnt change anything as we saw in last 3 years. So, why bother anymore? Why removing entire post instead of just editting it? You are getting lazier or something?

Interesting? Well we can discuss about that but that would be off topic, wouldnt it? Sure, the insult parts can be edited but its interesting that posts get completely removed if they include something WG doesnt like. Besides, again. Why do you think there were these insults? Maybe players dont want subs in there gamemods? Maybe?

Wasnt that one organised by WG? Thats why it doesnt count. And guess why you get these unconstructive comments with insults or vulgarism? Maybe subs are not wanted? Just maybe? Has it ever crossed to your mind i wonder? Btw. Have you ever thought that people are sick and tired of their constructive feedbacks being thrown into junk and thats why they dont bother anymore?

Lets see maybe because i have been in the same clans with him for more than 3 years?

And how many times should we exactly do that? We have been giving constructive feedback about subs for over a year and what was wgs respond? Testing subs in RANKED before introducing them into randoms although general feedback on forums was that subs dont belong to these gamemods. Do you know what happens to our constructive feedback? Thrown into junk.

It hilarious how mods had to clear this topic. @YabbaCoe community feedback is quite possitive against subs i assume Subs in ranked. Yeah WG definitely listen to feedback. Great testing ground you have there. Why dont you test them in kings of the see? Most competitive tournament in wows. Oh wait that was long ago. WG managed to destroy it too.

this is where you notice that you have no arguments whatsoever and started to feel yourself a bit dumb and start spreading even more nonsense. Cool story keep it going. Meanwhile I might contact flamu and ask him how his research about you is going.

to see them trying to dodge assashio torps in their cruisers and by doing that showing broadside to my BB and explode is priceless.

You shouldnt complicate things with something like community tokens.... Complete these missions on PTS. = get a premium tier 8 ship of choice on main server. Simple and encouraging. And yes, these missions shouldnt be easy to make people at least try playing somewhat better. They shouldnt be missions which can be completed by battle spam and should require some level of tryharding.

old enough. you still dont get it, do you? hilarious. target customer of WG right here... you are losing the focus point here. again, it doesnt matter what flamu thinks, what he says and how he says. the point, which is important and what you have to pay attention to, is the Q&A, in particular WGs answers. flamus only role is letting us know about the Q&A. i, personally wouldnt have heard about it if i didnt see the video in this topic. btw, you called me a flamu fan and yet its you who enjoys Flamu, watches his streams and praises him. me on the other hand, i cant stand to his streams at all. interesting

When a person is not able to understand what the video is actually about "read the title its focus is flamu " Still didnt answer the question: what did he call you? or did he take you as a subject to his "animal research"? I can guess but lets hear it from you

I dont know about you but i would leave wows the second a comparable game enters the market.

Pete no need to be a dck here, right? If someone wants to play a mp non simulation naval warfare game, wows is the pretty much only option. And this guy isnt the only one who thinks that way. Many people stick around just for that reason.

Zao isnt bad. New additions are just way better than her and this makes her look bad. I would rather slam petro and nevsky with a nerf hammer instead of buffing zao.

WG literally admited that they use popularity as a balancing factor. So, you know which parameters are taken into account when it comes to balancing better than WG? Said who? Not WG i can tell you that much. Because they made it clear popularity is a balancing factor for them.