Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

ghostbuster_

Players
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content Сount

    4,996

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    21881

  • Clan

    [OM]

Everything posted by ghostbuster_

  1. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    ghostbuster_ replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion

    Just wait and see. Nobody will just throw away 250k+ credits...
  2. ghostbuster_

    Why still buffing torps?

    ghostbuster_ replied to ghostbuster_'s topic in General Discussion

    I just got the shimikaze finally ^^
  3. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    ghostbuster_ replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion

    I dont think thats its gonna end with suicites. Because for tier X that means -250k+ credits. I thinkt people would try their 49% chance.
  4. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    ghostbuster_ replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion

    Dude the main problem with this game isnt the toxic in chat. Its maybe the last.
  5. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    ghostbuster_ replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion

    Yeah i already understood that. its you who doesnt understand. what does make you think that people need to look at statts first to call someone noob? you can see someone who does ridiculous moves or just plays bad. Hiding statts wont change the bad players so they will continue to play bad. And there will be people who call them noobs again.
  6. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    ghostbuster_ replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion

    And what will happen when people hide their statts like you? Will be there no more tomatoes in battles? Will everyone start magicly to perform better? No. So your call solves nothing. But my "hypothétical solution" can give a permanent solution.
  7. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    ghostbuster_ replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion

    I mean what you are suggesting is nonsense. That would solve anything. we would still get in the same match with tomatoes and we will still call them tomatoes. for that we dont have to see their statts. Everyone knows how a decent player acts against spesific situations.
  8. ghostbuster_

    Leaked info about new RB rules. Interesting!

    ghostbuster_ replied to Babykim's topic in General Discussion

    Indeed i checked his statts an he is a good player but im not saying that acording to his winrate. i checked the avrg damage he does with different ships. And he deals large amount of damage. Like i said other people can influence your winrate but avrg damage and kill/death ratio depend on you. different points of view so i respect your opinion.
  9. ghostbuster_
    i think it would be really good if the team battles became the ranked battles. You can choose your team and do your best as a team to get better ranks.
  10. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    ghostbuster_ replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion

    no we must not. MM should be fixed and must not place players from different levels in a match.
  11. ghostbuster_

    Bad games and who to blame?

    ghostbuster_ replied to cherry2blost's topic in General Discussion

    yeah when i see those tomatoes, i continue to grind other ships at tier 6-7.
  12. ghostbuster_

    Leaked info about new RB rules. Interesting!

    ghostbuster_ replied to Babykim's topic in General Discussion

    Of course. Those things are up to me. the influence of the teammember are not big on those. But winrate depends on teammembers more than it depends on you. You have a monster game like lot of damage kills vs... but if your team is full of tomatoes you lose the battle. And what did happen? you did maybe better than the all enemy but you winrate goes down. If there were clan battles or team battles (which are coming with patch) you could look at team winrate. than winrate would be more important because you choose your team and you do know that people in your team are not tomatoes. i can also give you an example. % battles with atago and in all of them i did 100k+ damage. each battle min 3 kills. but 5 loses. does that makes me a bad player or was i just unlucky about the tomatoes in my team? if you see the winrate that important that makes me a bad player. I am also not saying that winrate totaly unnecessary but avrg damage and kill/death ratio is more important.
  13. ghostbuster_

    Why still buffing torps?

    ghostbuster_ replied to ghostbuster_'s topic in General Discussion

    Yes of course. but they are not the statts i meant. They are infos about a ship without human factor. I meant the statts which people posts here to show how UP! DDs are. Those craps dont say anything about ship quality.
  14. ghostbuster_

    Leaked info about new RB rules. Interesting!

    ghostbuster_ replied to Babykim's topic in General Discussion

    I dont think thats only necessary for ranked battles. there should be also limitations also for random battles. and about waiting time, i dont think thats would take that long. For random battles it is deffinitely no probmlem. For ranked yeah it could take 1-2 mins longer but i gues it would be ok if we got a proper MM. An if there were those limitations more people would play ranked and waiting times wouldnt be that long. And yes the winrate should be that important. For me avrg damage and kill/death ration is much more important.
  15. ghostbuster_

    Propose to put a limit to the number of DD

    ghostbuster_ replied to Sancho89's topic in General Discussion

    I guess he was annoyed because i sent him maybe 5 salvos anyways thanks. have a good evening too.
  16. ghostbuster_

    Why still buffing torps?

    ghostbuster_ replied to ghostbuster_'s topic in General Discussion

    Statts show how good player perform not the ship. If you look someones statts with minekaze, you can make comments about his performence not the ships quality. so dont afree and i wont use statts for a ships quality
  17. ghostbuster_
    thank you for info i didnt know that. Well you are right mogami will be atago without heal ability.
  18. ghostbuster_
    Well mogami will be like Atago wont it? with 15 203mm canons. Atago is a good ship with 10 203 cannons. why do people complain about mogami that much?
  19. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    ghostbuster_ replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion

    yes probably it wont be like i said. You can enjoy teaching people but i dont care. I play this game to have fun in my free times not to teach someone. And i guess the best learning way is practice in this game. Make more battles so they can learn what they should do. you dont have to teach them.
  20. ghostbuster_

    Montana ve Yamatonun Yeniden Elden geçmesini rica ediyoruz

    ghostbuster_ replied to maxrix55's topic in Oynanış

    Şöyle: bir geminin zırhından yararlanmak istiyorsan yavaşla burun tarafını düşmana göster aynı bir çok savaşta insanların yamatoyla yaptıkları gibi. Ama aynısını montanayla yaparsan ezerler. Kruvazör gibi oynamalısın dediğim sabit durma hareket et. mesele gidiyosun ateş ettin sonrabaktın adam sana ateş ediyo hemen rotanı değiştir adamın ıskalaması için uğraş. Yamatoda mantık ammaaan bana vurursa vursun zaten vuran yamato olmadığı sürece problem yok ama montana da mantık adam bana vurmamalı. O yüzden kruvazör gibi oynanmalı dedim.
  21. ghostbuster_
    it wont get any nerfes as long as i know. or will it get nerfs?
  22. ghostbuster_

    Best Money maker Ship ?

    ghostbuster_ replied to JubaM24's topic in General Discussion

    Atago is a very good ship. Its really strong and you can gain tons of credits with it. Tirpitz is an other posibility.
  23. ghostbuster_

    Propose to put a limit to the number of DD

    ghostbuster_ replied to Sancho89's topic in General Discussion

    He did know he was fighting a DD. and he was thinking that im in his way so we was sailing that way. but i wasnt there. and spotter plane has reload time as you know. It was up so i could get to close but than it went down and i could get close. He can go and help their team but i guess i was being really annoying and maybe he thought that he could just cap our base and win.
  24. ghostbuster_

    Why still buffing torps?

    ghostbuster_ replied to ghostbuster_'s topic in General Discussion

    Statts doesnt give a clue about the quality of ship. There are too many factors with affects the statts so you cant just rely on the pure numbers.
  25. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    ghostbuster_ replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion

    You can do your best in a battles with people on your level whats wrong about it? what you said makes me think you are either afraid of facing on players on your level or you need "tomatoes to perform well in a battle. You can do anything, you do atm, in that battles against people on your level as well. and from an other point of view do you really enjoy killing that "tomatoes"? wouldnt you prefer to face a player on your level and get little bit copetition? its not a league but that bad players waste the labor of other players with doing nothing. i couldnt find a way to make it work for divisions atm. well MM can place the division in a battle due to the worst player in division. So he wouldnt ruin the fun of other players in a more skilled match.
×