.jpg.e1f63c7784823da3229aa6beaa84adcd.jpg)
ghostbuster_
-
Content Сount
4,996 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
21881 -
Clan
[OM]
Everything posted by ghostbuster_
-
some commens? when you see anything about DDs, "but yamato has x dmg those DDS are underperforming!" If there was a buff about other ships which is gonna break the game, i woul make comments about it. If BBs get that buff i would say that the buff is unnecessary. I know the torpeo buff is not needed i know because i play them myself.
-
best strategy: spot DDs for your team first.
-
There is no need to discuss with [edited] anymore dude. I suggest you to do what i did. Get a shimakaze and enjoy the OP torpedos.
-
oh i remembered now. you were the one who was cring about yamato being OP.
-
oh im so sorry please waste some more time here. Anyways i will see you all cry here about torps. Im looking forward to have 72 kts torps with my shimakaze.
-
you know what... never min im so tired with trying to explain it to you.
-
and i do so. To say a player good or not i check his statts with that ship. what can +5% Vigilance help? 72 kts torpedos? how much reaction time do people have 1 sec more? Dont be funny please. maybe or maybe not. But you cant say that easy ok this ship has arg dmg x that one y. X>Y so Y is uner performing
-
so buffing torps because enemy oesnt sail on a straight line? And i dont expect they happen all the time. But with luck and skill those ships have very good capacity already. There is no need for buffs
-
Its not for DDs so. Also for BBS and CAs. If the enemy makes mistakes you can o more damage.
-
It is luck to hit another ship that you dint aim. If we are talking about me fine. My highiest dmg with shimikaze is 200k+. so If i can play that good again and if i have little bit luck i can do this amount of damage again. So the ship is capable to o that. My tring to increase the capacity of this ship. Ifs already capable of doing really well. Yes my avarage is far behing 200k because i couldnt play that good again and idnt have that much luck. but that doesnt mean shimikaze is a under performing ship. It is my fault not ships.
-
Why forget about luck? Its a part of this game. And balancing, if a ship can already do really huge amount of damage and monster battles, its surely capable of doing that. No ship can do something that it is not capable of. So if some guys can do that with tohe ships but some people cant, there is no need for a buff. those guys should try harder maybe they can use the capacity of ships.
-
You [edited] enough of this they shouldnt do it always. It enough to do it one time. If someone does 500k damage with midway it means that this ship is capable to do that.
-
Im claiming that there is no need for a change. yes statistics are better with more observations thats right. But you are making comment about the ship itself by looking the stats. Im observating only one player and im making comment only about that player not about the ships he play. what kind of thought is that "the ships he plays to boost his stats". lol we play this game to have fun not to have good stats. we try to o our best because thats a team battle and each of team members has their responsibilities. And we also want to win to get better rewards and buy new ships and try different ships.
-
im not cherry picking because its the max limit. For example if a players scores a goal from corner-kick. You can assume that he is capable to of scoring goal from corner-kick.
-
if you notice i didnt say useless about playerstatts. they show how good the player is. Im talking about ship statts. like arvg damage of a ship or winrate of a ship. if a ship is really underpowered, nobody could perform well in this ship even with luck. so stop cring because DDs are being underpowered.
-
like i said dont try to teach me science. i dont want to give it extra time to explain you about science or statistics. back to topic. If someone can get monsters games with shima like 250k+ damage. With luck or without luck it oesnt matter because luck is a part of this game. That means, this ship is capable to perform that good. So problem is not about ship. its about people who play it.
-
Are you heavy disabled or are you pretending like one? Your statts are affected by too many other factors. you cant claim that they show the pure ship quality. If you want to see the max capacity you have to look its best score which is affected by all factors in a possitive way.
-
Lol you are trying to teach me science. i only laugh that. you can be sure that i know how it works. look if you want to o an observation. you cant leave the factors which affects your observation. What you say is like calculating the acceleratioın without considering the friction. If you buff a ship due to that ridiculous numbers, the good players who can use the ships capabilities, will be able to do more.
-
lol I am not calling for a buff or nerf here. what i say is that torpedo speed buff is unnecessary.
-
Dont worry i wouldnt cry like you here if i cant do well in a ship. "BUFF THIS SHIP! THAT PUPPY NUMBERS TELL US IT IS UNDERPERFORMING"
-
Different populations? You assume that arp kongo players are just better than kongo players then. But it cant be for shimikaze captains? Actual argument? which is? pure number. i guess you have difficulties to understand things. Those numbers are affected by so many factors so they cant give us the ship quality. Luck? what is wrong with that. Luck is a part of this game. but you think there are no diffrences betwwen a shimikaze player who spam torps from 12-15 km and a shimikaze player who take risks, gets close an launch torps? The max damage shows the max capability of a ship. because it means that ship can do that much damage if people plays it well and with little luck. So if "poor tomatoes" cant do that damage its not ships fault.Stop blaming the ship and try to be better.
-
Statts dont say anything about quality of ship but it says something about how good the player is. It doesnt matter if they suits my arguments or not i say always the same "Statts dont say anything about quality of ship". Is that really that hard to get... And i ont make any comments according to statts about well performing or bad performing ships. I see them in battles. There are very good players decent players and bad players. but i know what a ship capable of. About DDs i talk by experience not due to statts. If some people can perform like monster with a ship, that show the capablities of this ship. If someone can get like 200k+ damage with shimikaze and get the 1 place in his team with a huge exp difference, it shows the capability of that ship. There are no super people who can just exceed the limits of ships. If someone can perform that well and you cant, its not the ship its you that is underperforming.
-
I said statts dont say anything about ship quality because some people claimed that DDs are UP. When i asked why, they gave me statts as a evidence. And i said statts doesnt show the ship quality. But they show how good the player is thou. arp kongo has better statts than kongo but that doesnt mean that arp kongo is op against kongo. Its just because better players. we can also say arp kongo is a image of kongo in right hands. So the statts about DDs, in right hands DDs are just monsters. Not only IJP ones. Also USN DDs. the same about kongo example is also relevant for DDs. Having worse avrg dmg or worse winrate doesnt mean they are under performing. So eighter way i claim the same "statts dont give us any info about ship quality".
-
about Des moins and zao example, maybe they jsut have different roles in a battle. But we can not understan it fully unless the CVs are back in game. about kongo, doesnt matter. So ARP kongo have better statts because of players who play it. But ARP kongo isnt OP if you compare it with kongo. So statts show us player quality not the ship. He meant exactly this.
-
Didnt you really understand what he meant or are you just trolling? 1. There are numbers about differentn abilities. survivability, artillery, AA defense, maneuverability, concealment. You can see those numbers in game. If you click on a ship on the right side of you screean when you are at port. Those number the capabilities of ships. 2. But if we talk about statts we mean the number whre you can see at peoples profil at website of game or at diffferent websites for example warships.today. So those numbers dont say anything about ship quality and its capabilities. those show the player quality. how good he/she plays. And about that example please listen carefully i know you can understand this: Some people said that DDs are underperforming due to numbers (2. type of numbers) So XTHD meant those numbers dont say anything about ship quality and he wanted to explain that with an example. So he gave the kongo example. But he tried to explain that those number dont show anything about ship quaility. Because ARP KONGO and kongo are the same ship. But ARP kongo has better numbers so does that make kongo underperforming? he asked that question. And the answer was obvious because they are the same ship. so you cant say that a ship is UP or OP by looking at 2. type of numbers. He has been always saying that the stats are unrealiable. Is it clear now?
.thumb.jpg.da1b98edacdacaeedbf9cd36f9b2af68.jpg)