Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

ghostbuster_

Players
  • Content Сount

    4,996
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    21881
  • Clan

    [OM]

Everything posted by ghostbuster_

  1. ghostbuster_

    Bir Bilene Sor !

    Sen de bazı yanlış bilgiler vermişsin. Zırh delici uzun mesafelerde de gayet etkili olabiliyor. 26 km den birçok kez köşk vuruşu yapmışlığım var. Evet açı önemli ama hangi gemide olduğun ve karşında hangi geminin olduğu da önemli. Mesela bir zıhlı kullanıyorsan ve sana doğru gelen bir kruvazör varsa zırh delici atabilirsin hiç yüksek patlayıcıya değiştirmene gerek yok.
  2. Olabilir aslına. Ama bu olacaksa hem bir arkadaşın ilerleyen gönderilerde belirttiği gibi stressiz bir ortam olmalı hem de bir teamspeak yada başka bir sesli chat programı kullanılmalı. İleride böyle bir oluşum olursa benimle de irtibata geçebilirsin.
  3. ghostbuster_

    [edited]

    yes that is what i meant.
  4. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    it is teamplay. covering eachother and focusing your fire on one ship. In a teamplay people cooperate and do evething to win. That includes sacrifices. If people should make a choice between two people they should choose the one who can be more usefull. It doesnt mean not helping to red players ever. why o you think that it doesnt fit with the naval battles context? Doing sacrifices, doing everything no matter what, to win the battle, i think that fits with context of any battle.
  5. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    -you can shush the players who pretend like a pro and make the chat toxic. so it also prevents the chat to be more toxic. -you can see which teammember is more important to team. If there are 2 yamatos one of them is re an other is blue, it makes no sence trying to cover the red one. this would help your team to win. -developing tactics. take the strongest enemy down and you can win easier. the purpose is winning the battle, this is not to forget.
  6. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    Why are you so obsessed? Are you so many times flamed? There are also benefits like i mention in my previous post. There will always be toxic with stats or without them. There might be even more because without stats every "noob" can pretend like a pro. When they try this atm moment you can shush him by saying that his stats explain everything. So there is no need to throw away those benefits for nothing.
  7. ghostbuster_

    [edited]

    yes exactly. and not only campers. there are too many people who have no idea what to do. And making the economy easier woul cause more of those people to get tier Xs. and about that campers, one thing they dont understand, win the battle=more credits. if they camp back, do little damage and lose the battle; they would still lose credits even they stayed alive.
  8. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    And isnt what he did a toxic in chat? he didnt do it according to our stats. so with XVM or without there is always toxic. Stats are not the reason for that. why would someone want to hide his stats if they are not bad? There is no reason. If you dont have badd stats dont hide. Noboy would insult you or make the chat toxic because of you. Ok winning chance is 45%. what is changed? Wont people do their best? of course they do. It shouldnt have that big affect on gameplay. a guy said: "they would just exit the port." well nobody would throw 300k credits away for -5%. and actually XVM can be good tool. Because before the battle starts you can see which guy you can trust. For example, if you are a USN CA and if there is CVs, you can pick the better BB to give AA cover. Or for CVs, once they spot the enemy ships they can take a look which palyer is better and he can just focus on him. same for all ship classes.
  9. ghostbuster_

    [edited]

    the economy is fine. they cant do it easier because its alreay too easy grinding to tier X. And there should be no place at tier X for people who cant even make profit at tier7-8.
  10. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    today i was in a div and my friend gave to a tirpitz like 30k with his yamato and i finished him with 1 torpedo. after that this tirpitz player started to insult my friend. and in discussion he meant that he also had montana yamato iowa and tirpitz as BBs. So i checked his statts if he says the truth. Guess what i found out: that guy had less than 600 battles and his top tier non-premium ship was colorado. His statts were also awfull in each type of ship. So if he hidden his statts, we couldnt find out if he says the truth or not. That hiding option should be removed. They are your statts. If you shame of them try harder to get better and dont mess up with other people.
  11. ghostbuster_

    Battleships secondary guns

    No, actually my shimakaze is ready for patch
  12. ghostbuster_

    Battleships secondary guns

    Wait the patch for the complaints about DDs.
  13. ghostbuster_

    Montana ve Yamatonun Yeniden Elden geçmesini rica ediyoruz

    montanaya herhangi bir değişiklik yapmaya gerek yok. farklı bir oyun stili var. doğru kullanıldığında gayet güzel bit gemi.
  14. ghostbuster_

    Why still buffing torps?

    Well i read the patch notes and noticed that new captain skill which gives torpedos more speed. I dont think that there are need of such a skill atm. Torpedos are already performing really good. I dont understand why WG insist about making the DDs the gods of seas. I hope at the end of the public test they reconsider about this captain skill. oh and an other thing, the last stand skill wont be at level 4 anymore! WG gotta be kidding us.
  15. ghostbuster_

    On the survivabilty of classes

    Or cruisers should play smarter. the only advantage the BBs have is the gunfire.
  16. ghostbuster_

    Failing hard at tirpitz..... Advises?

    Dont show your broadside to enemy BBs. You should be just fine. And i can suggest you to use premium repair. Its cooldown is less than the normal one. that would also help you about fires. And of course get the captain skills.
  17. ghostbuster_

    Why still buffing torps?

    Oh i see now your main ship is a kagero. That explains everything. and my opinion is you dont know sh*t about high tier battles. i and many others said there is a problem with DDs. you can also see a other thread about limitation the DD numbers per battle. Oh why hiding you statts? let people know, with who they are talking.
  18. ghostbuster_

    Why still buffing torps?

    do tier 10 battles and see it yourself.
  19. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    for the people who dont wanna see the toxic in chat, just ignore it or block it.
  20. ghostbuster_

    Why still buffing torps?

    There arent huge amount of DDs in high tiers? Are you kiding me? I cant see how oft you player high tiers thou because often another hidden profile. Every time i play there are 4 DDs in one team. very often 5 or 6. and you can also see 7-8 DDs in a team. Shoul it be like 10 DDs you to accept the huge amount of DDs?
  21. ghostbuster_

    Why still buffing torps?

    I was telling that there are huge amount of DDs in high tier battles thats right. And yes it doesnt matter. They can be rare but they stlii exist.
  22. ghostbuster_

    Why still buffing torps?

    doesnt matter. they are already doing good and no need to be better
  23. ghostbuster_

    Why still buffing torps?

    maybe there are also good players? an they get also buff?
  24. ghostbuster_

    Why still buffing torps?

    Too many [edited]cannot perform with DDs. thats all
  25. ghostbuster_

    How do i get 1300+ base xp?

    Cap, Def or deal massive damage.
×