Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

ghostbuster_

Players
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content Сount

    4,996

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    21881

  • Clan

    [OM]

Everything posted by ghostbuster_

  1. ghostbuster_

    More advanced flooding-mechanic

    ghostbuster_ replied to DaWyrm's topic in General Discussion

    I get it you are trying to make the game more realistic. but its a game not real life. and if you make things realistic there are too many other things. for example. Do you believe that the famous WWII DD fletcher could survive after getting hit by yamatos 460mm guns? No way. Or CVs should be able to lauch all of his planes at the same time in real life they didnt lauch 6 torpedo bombers and attack. if i remember it right 200 planes attacked to yamato. See, those changes would only break the game.
  2. ghostbuster_

    Captain skills deactivation

    ghostbuster_ replied to dasCKD's topic in General Discussion

    What is hard? training captain? actually you can start to use it with mutsuki and hatsu. 8 km range is enough. there is no need to talk about after fubuki i guess.
  3. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    ghostbuster_ replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion

    310-50=260. with flag 234k. For me MM is a huge problem. because it puts that [edited]s in the same match with experienced players. If there was a player skill based MM mirroring your problem about "leaving the party" would be solved too. atm moment XVM and being able to see peoples stats have advantages but nobody here saw any side effects yet. So what you are suggesting is killing something which has advantages about devaloping tactics to win but which has also negative effects that are not observed yet. It doesnt make any sence atm. If we see those effects that you are claiming than we can discuss again. But as i said nobody would throw his money away, its not that dramatic like you think.
  4. ghostbuster_

    Captain skills deactivation

    ghostbuster_ replied to dasCKD's topic in General Discussion

    you have to make choices. it has been never easy to train captain for other classes. why should it be easy for IJP DDs?
  5. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    ghostbuster_ replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion

    yes i get it and you are right. But as i have been saying for pages, there is nothing to fix about XMV.
  6. ghostbuster_

    More advanced flooding-mechanic

    ghostbuster_ replied to DaWyrm's topic in General Discussion

    they can do that probably but is there any need of this? Because flooing already causes lot of damage.
  7. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    ghostbuster_ replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion

    there is only one way to lose more, you should not move and shoot to nowhere all the game. if you do this you can lose more. but if you hit anything there is no way to lose more than 310k. If the one who doesnt want to spend the ammo fee is an [edited] because he will lose more credits by leaving party. And as a premium user 310k is too high and just leaving the party makes your stats awful and than you might need to hide your stats. If you dont believe me about credit loses try it yourself. get in a battle with your highest tier ship and right after the battle starts exit to port. Here you go! you finally found much more urgent problem. the MM.
  8. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    ghostbuster_ replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion

    It is even harder for a non-premium player giving that much credits away. why not trying your chance? maybe you will cap some points and get 10-12 torpedo hits. Its worth to try. and i didnt have always premium. I know the economy for BBs thou. There is no way for me to exit without doing anything. I use premium and i have nearly 10M right now but no 310k is too much for just giving away. And this is really [edited] what you claim. do people play only if they have noobs on enemy team? So little bit stronger enemy and just return to port? I dont think so. Playing against experienced enemies has always been more fun.
  9. ghostbuster_
    thats nice. because lots of CV players think that spoting is not their job. I even heard one time that someone said: "i wont risk my planes to scout enemy DDs. their AA shoot my planes down." you could spot the enemy CV for you sniper BBs. and once he is dead too, sit back and relax.
  10. ghostbuster_
    Hmm let me think how about scouting with fighters?
  11. ghostbuster_
    I saw Gunship14 yesterday in a crapy battle. There were 1 gearing and 1 shimakaze on our team. In return the enemy team had 7! DDs. 2 gearings, 2 shimakazes and 3 other DDs. Thanks to Gunship14 in his gearing we won the battle.
  12. ghostbuster_

    More advanced flooding-mechanic

    ghostbuster_ replied to DaWyrm's topic in General Discussion

    Would you like to get also nuclear torpedos?
  13. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    ghostbuster_ replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion

    To make worse than -310k you have to shoot but do absolutly no damage. As long as you do damage you wont lose more than 310k.(talking for premium account)
  14. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    ghostbuster_ replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion

    simple calculation: Yamato repair is around 260k if you sunk. So if he leaves the battle, 260k repair+ probably premium heal and repair so 22,5k+ 22,5k= 310k. but if he plays and hits something, does damage, even they lose the battle he wouldnt lose 310k or more credits. So its not likely to happen.
  15. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    ghostbuster_ replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion

    whole those time we have been able to see peoples stats and the mod is also working but i didnt see any side effects. i remember someone mentioned about suiciding people in WoT. well i dont know the WoT but here in WoWs nobody would just throw away that much credits because of the mod or stats. Im sorry but this is [edited] and there are much more urgent problems in this game. Toxic in chat is the last thing that you concern about.
  16. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    ghostbuster_ replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion

    i got it why he started this thread. what i mean is there are also benefits of having this mod and being able to see peoples stats. I dont care about general stats. his stats in the specific ship interests me. If he sails his iowa for example his stats with iowa interests me.
  17. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    ghostbuster_ replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion

    well this is the peoples mentality. when they see hidden stats they think this guys has crap stats. And it is generally true. btw let us see you stats so we can see if you tell us the truth or not.
  18. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    ghostbuster_ replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion

    Is a better atmosphere or winning the battles more important? I dont care if the atmospehere is toxic or not. If there are benefits which helps to win, i would keep it. Yes but you cant just change that with this topic. As you see they are mostly the players with crapy stats who hide their stats. because people with good stats dont see a need to hide them.
  19. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    ghostbuster_ replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion

    there are already toxic in chat. with XVM or without it. and wg just [edited] up with their solution. because atm hidden stats=bad stats.
  20. ghostbuster_

    Why level up to anything but the Shimakaze?

    ghostbuster_ replied to Ginger_General's topic in General Discussion

    it wont be any better than this. actually with that ridiculous torpedo buff it will be worse. So i would suggest you to get a shimakaze as soon as possible and benefit the 72 kts torps.
  21. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    ghostbuster_ replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion

    You dont want to see the benefits of stats. You are saying that you want to keep toxic away from chat but it has nothing with hidden stats or with XVM to do.
  22. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    ghostbuster_ replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion

    broken logic? you told that in your previous post, not to support good player because he can manage things on his own or with normal players. those were your words. I thought that he is a good player an pushed hard. If i knew that he is crap, i wouldnt push forward that hard. Good player can do also mistakes yes but not that basic mistakes. that wasnt a long range torp. I was 2 km before him. So a "good player" dont do this. sadly i cannot use XVM because of my PC. thats why i check the stats of people in key ships. For example shimakaze, yamato, zao or CVs. And that works. for example if i see that our CV is crap i would be more carefull about torps because i know that he is not gonna try to spot DDs. but if i see that he is a good player than i ask him to spot DDs kindly and i can trust him.
  23. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    ghostbuster_ replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion

    ok first game you get red. after second or third you would probably be yellow or green because its really difficult to stay red.
  24. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    ghostbuster_ replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion

    what about CV captain. Should he leave the blue BB because "he can manage this alone" and he has also "normal players" with him? Or a DD? should he spot for other red BB because the blue one can handle DDs? It makes always sence to choose the good one if you should make a choice. It would make you win battle maybe. So to do this we need statts. for example i cant use the mod because my pc is not good enoughç I was in a battle with my montana and there were a mogami behind me. I was engaging 2 BBs, trying to dodge fubuki torpeos and there was also a taiho who was focusing on me. So guess what happene? that [edited] mogami torped me. So if i had the mod i could see that he is a [edited] and i wouldnt trust him and dont push that fast. And if we dont have any stat infos it would happen like it happeed to me. Because you cant know who you can trust and who you cant.
  25. ghostbuster_

    Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)

    ghostbuster_ replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion

    let the blue one alone he can lead the flank alone? oh you are not that good like you think you are.
×