-
Content Сount
4,996 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
21881 -
Clan
[OM]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by ghostbuster_
-
limit both? limit the number of DDs and also BBs? limit them with 3 per team. Battles would be much more fun.
-
Mines - A consumable for Cruisers?
ghostbuster_ replied to EGF_Classic's topic in General Discussion
this is a game not a history lesson. Historically, CVs were able to launch all planes at the same time. So pls dont come here with the argument "historically". -
i fully agree with you but let those [edited] DD mafia be. No need to explain anything to them, they wont get your point. They are sh*ting their pants because their precious DDs might get nerfed.
-
Mines - A consumable for Cruisers?
ghostbuster_ replied to EGF_Classic's topic in General Discussion
Buff for CAs no way! WG loves to buff only DDs. I think they would give this new consumable to DDs. -
Why is RNG playing the game instead of me?
ghostbuster_ replied to MS_Surface's topic in General Discussion
Amagi has 5 twin turrens so 10 guns. And the reason of low damage is ridiculous overpens. If a CA come close to you and shows full broadside, you get only overpens. But if he sails right towards you you get citadels. -
Radar - Maybe a Future for Cruisers
ghostbuster_ replied to Crusherheads's topic in General Discussion
yeah i just had a game and after it i saw your post. there were 2 shimas in enemy team. we had a taiho and shokaku. i saw 30 torps at a cap and told them to spot A at the beginning . what did they do? they didnt spot shimas even once. they tried to do damage! those kind of [edited] are sailing tier 8s-9s. -
Radar - Maybe a Future for Cruisers
ghostbuster_ replied to Crusherheads's topic in General Discussion
Take a look at threads about DDs. But you will also see them here. -
Radar - Maybe a Future for Cruisers
ghostbuster_ replied to Crusherheads's topic in General Discussion
yes i know but there are some DD guys here in forum, who think DDs are very underpowered and only they should get buffs. -
Radar - Maybe a Future for Cruisers
ghostbuster_ replied to Crusherheads's topic in General Discussion
where is the DD mafia? i expected them to cry already. -
fix that [edited] crap. WG stop doing unnecessary sound improvements and fix that [edited] MM.
-
agree with that. they annonced that the MM will be better but it is worse now.
-
Pensa is not that bad i think. after th buff it got it is much much better than the pensa before the buff. AP deals really good damage. you can also hit citadels on fuso. AA is good for its tier. And every time i faced a cleveland with my pensa i won really easy. You just have to know what to do. Yeah it has worse reload time but that doesnt mean shooting ap or he all the time. Play smart and you will see, its not that bad.
-
1) actually they dont. you have to see north carolina. 2) if you angle your ship properly, the armor is not bad. Its just weak against yamato after angling. 3) it has been long time since i played amagi. but if i remember correct after the range upgrade, its good. 20km+ isnt bad. And about stock ships. Every stock ship is crap exept tier Xs.
-
i have never used any mod for crosshairs. but after the patch i also noticed that i should give much more lead to target.
-
Btw i noticed that new USN dive bombers do really good damage. And also a guys in his midway told that the new dive bombers are great.
-
2 top hits. So how much damage did you do in total? I guess its not that much and its normal to lose credits with that score.
-
Which forum members have you seen in random battles?
ghostbuster_ replied to Cobra6's topic in General Discussion
my bad dude i think i missunderstand you, sorry. and yeah it was crap for us. your taiho didnt let me do anything well played. -
or more brutal solution would be death. Who touches the border dies immediately. In this case a warning for closing to border is necessary.
-
kills dont matter. if you do like 50k damage with tier X you lose credits. Do more damage, get credits.
-
its a fail patch...
-
I also noticed the nerf but there is nothing to complain about it.
-
evet bence de gereksizdi. zaten az cv var şimdi daha da az olacak
-
Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)
ghostbuster_ replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion
let them answer then.- 306 replies
-
- wows-stats
- XVM
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)
ghostbuster_ replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion
i dont think that i understood anything wrong.- 306 replies
-
- wows-stats
- XVM
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)
ghostbuster_ replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion
LoL really? Is there anyone who loses credits under tier 8 even when he lose the battle? To lose credits at those tiers you have to be a real [edited]. So if they left the party they would lose money but if they play even if they lose they will make profits. It seems also unlikely to happen. I remember as 260k but i might be wrong. I will check it again. And first of all this is not WoT, this is WoWs different game, ddifferent communities. So i know as much as you know about XVM in this game. You might know more for WoT but for that you may visit the WoT forum. so for this game "you think" and its "assumption" what you made. you say the reason, why we didnt see any side effects yet, is that not many people use it. Or maybe you are wrong and maybe its not that dramatic. If we can get benefits from that mod, let the chat be toxic. there is no problem as long as people dont suicide because of this mod. And as we talked its very unlikely. Leaving the party= lose a battle, certain lose of money; playing it no matter what= may be a win and may be a profit. (for low tiers its very likely to make profit.)- 306 replies
-
- wows-stats
- XVM
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
