pra3y

Guy deleted the account after posting. 2000+ game and practically all in BBs. (I had a look at his stats b4 they were deleted)

Hahahaha well, I actually have the ships that I wanted. So just bought the boxes to see if I will be lucky enough to get a random ship That's enough gambling for me this season.

Bought 10 mega boxes, no ship

Silly me wrong thread

You funny. You no play gunboat DD?

Im not being smug. Frankly if the exact same thing happened to me I'll be shaking my head and laughing at my own stupidity and telling myself not to make the same mistake. I will not blame someone else for my own mistake and make a big hoo ha out of it. People are too entitled now a days and blame everyone but themselves even if they themselves are at fault in the first place.

How is "COMBAT MISSION FOR 2,500 DOUBLOONS FOR MASSACHUSETTS" be misleading? No where in the statement said that its for Massachusetts Black. If anything it would be OP's own mistaken assumption that the mission was for Massachusetts Black.

You should be. Why did you scam yourself by not reading properly. Make sure to lodge a ticket to yourself and let us know the result.

Lol OP, why did u delete away the title and this: Iam playing this game on steam , recently i quit this game because i give time to other game so my question is that "Is that they give rewards of not playing or login in this game ? Because i see so many threads regarding reward of not login or playing this game , many player's got free xp/credits , premium ships , premium time . and my 2nd question is that "If they give reward then after how much days or months they give reward ?" And please also tell Is that they also give 'not login' reward to steam users ? Please give serious answers !!

I don't use priority target for any of my ships for roughly the same reason, but i use incoming fire alert on my cruiser captains. I think PT would be useful for a BB captain as an additional guage on when to push and when to pull back.

I think you don't really have any major issue with regards to positioning base on the replay. You know when to push and when not to not overextend. There is map awareness in knowing where the DDs are However, abit too passive and slow to react, especially at the start. The more immediate problem is with your aiming, which is pretty bad. Don't try to aim at the waterline all the time unless you have a perfect broadside target. Say that Richelieu, you could have shot at its guns/ superstructure with an AP volley instead of going after that DD. Also while its good that you switch ammo and go after enemy DDs, personal preference wise I would just keep to my AP shells when shooting at the DDs. I think you wasted quite a fair bit of time changing shell types during the battle. Assume that Nagato below is the enemy ship you're aiming at from a distance. It is travelling angled towards its left. Assuming it maintains this course, where you should be aiming at is where the orange circle is at since the Nagato is travelling away from you. If you aim at the water line i.e the green circle area then baring RNGesus, all your shots will miss as they'll splash harmlessly to the right of the Nagato. Basically aim higher when they're angled away/turning left and aim lower if they're angled in/ turning right. Let me shamelessly throw in one of my latest BB replay if you're interested in having a look. I think it's a pretty decent game. https://replayswows.com/replay/36570#stats

Contrary to what I've been reading, my FdG grind has been pretty ok. Only skipped the last 20k~30k xp grind cause i wanted an extra sc from the anniversary. Even with a secondary built (no accuracy mod) the main guns are accurate enough for me. I think to play the FdG effectively people have to relly know when to push and when to pull back, along with making use of cover etc, basically the basics. More often then not I see people in FdGs or Purrfurst either close to the map border and as far away from the fight as possible cause their detection is bad and they dont want to be shot at or theh recklessly throw themselves at the enemy. More of the former than the latter though. As long as you can read the minimap and know what you're doing FdG is pretty ok. Played 72 games in it with this stats at the end:

It depends on the circumstances for me tbh. There are alot of unfortunate ppl out there who unfortunately fall prey to pretty unscrupelous people. On the other there are some people who are really just asking for it. If deserve is too strong a word then how about "asking for it"?

I get your point, but if at the end of the day a person is going to equip a camo that resupplies using dubloons and dont pay attention, i still think that person is careless and deserves it. Poor gui? Maybe. But at the end of the day to me, it issufficient. Any new design added in is just a QoL bonus.

Actually detonation isnt exactly that RNG is it? It is dependent on whether the shells or torps of an enemy ship hits your magazine. Only then will you have your RNG of whether you'll explode or not. Im assuming and guess that DDs detonate more often cause the armour protecting their magazine is weaker as compared to the one protecting a BB magazine. So if i sail up to a broadside BB and keep on aiming all my shots at his magazine, it is entirely possible to detonate the said BB as long as my shots can pen the magazine. So if you dont want to be detonated dont get hit

On the topic, my opinion is that if you're careless then its your problem, especially since WG has made some changes for the better. If you equip a camo or flag that cost dubloon to resupply and dont uncheck it afterwards then its your fault. For me i usually use the concealment and dispersion camo onl unless i have perma camo for said ship. If say i want more exp or credit and use a special camo or flags i always make sure i remove them after the game. So i don't really see the point. Quality of life? Maybe. But if you're careful then what is the problem?

I almost always detonate in my BBs whenever i turn to avoid torps but catch one fish in my magazine. I remembered consecutively detonating in 2/3 bbs during 1 play session cause of that.

If we remove it, how am i going to one shot underage ships with stonk british he shells? I don't really mind it though since it adds abit of spice to the game. Not that i detonate often in the first place. If i detonate or my teammate detonate then its just our bad luck. Off to the next game.

Im actually curious why a similar thread by a CC is still up after a day but the one from a forumite gets nuked.

Well not saying you can't evade, but that will take alot of wild and sudden course changes. There are plenty of DDs that think not showing broadside is enough, as long as they move away angled they can't be hit. But all the BB player has to do is to change where he aims and bam, accuracy and RNG will handle the rest.

It is the amount of shells that overpen you, how much health a DD has and how the overpen mechanic work on DD currently. I landed about 4 BB AP shells on a shima yesterday and that was 1/3~1/2 of his health gone if i remember correctly. DDs have the lowest health pool so as long as engh shells land, even if they overpen it'll do significant damage to them.

Well at mid~high tiers BB guns are accurate enough that if you show broadside, even in a DD you're liable to be blabbed even beyond 13km. Even if you're not showing broadside, RNG may still land a shell or 2 on you. IMO only way is to wild manouver and keep on changing directions/change directions abrupbtly.

Hahahaha I think the closest I get to realism is Wargames, but I only played 1 or 2 games. I like building "Sim cities" and also variety in my gameplay, which is why I enjoyed CoH. Act of Aggression was not bad but having only 3 vanilla factions makes it kinda boring. Don't really like the graphic for 8-bit army so I have not tried it out. I tried Grey Goo though. AI in that game is tough as nails.

I doubt EA will ever fall. But I hope they either make a decent game out of it or sell/license out the IP for C&C.