pra3y

You an @Excavatus have a fan club

I usually follow where the DDs go but base on what I understand from OP's post, the DDs literally did this (depending on where they spawn since OP didn't mention. Either way both are bad position): Are you saying that if all the DDs go to the map border, all the ships including should just follow them, ignore the cap points or allow the enemy a obstruction free route to the base cap? What is the purpose of following the DDs when they are literally not doing anything that will help win the game? In fact if anything, the moment all those DDs went to the map border, they literally threw the game away, especially in a game with no CV, which means the only thing that can help with spotting is a DD. Even in a game with a CV that shouldn't happen unless left with no other choice. I don't understand why you would think that it is a good idea to follow DDs to the map border. Even if the DDs are not at the map border, why are they all lemming in 1 area while the team is at the other? At least 1 or 2 DD should have spawned at the direction the team is heading in and decided, "screw this we'll just go to the other side". IMO that is just another indication of poor play on the DDs part. If you have support coming your way why would you even go somewhere where you know you will not be getting any support?

What about "there is a chance we may actually win this" and ".... hopefully they'll do something stup1d" or am i the only one that heard those 2 lines

An old article from AP on how WG deals with chatban: https://thearmoredpatrol.com/2017/11/25/how-wg-handles-chat-bans-wows/

Didn't Jingles mentioned in a video the other day that when you send in a valid complain with replay to Support, they'll actually do something about it. However due to privacy law they are unable to disclose the action taken.

Why shouldn't it? Just because a game is free to play doesn't mean that it is a charity. Its a business. Money has to come from somewhere and they are not obligated to cater to the whims and fancy who play for free do they? OP's post comes across as pretty self-entitled tbh. 1) Don't want to/ cannot afford to spend some money (I'm assuming base on what OP has written) 2) Does not have enough time to play the game 3) Expects the game to cater to him by not being a credit "scam" The fact that you can play low or mid tier without actual economic loss is already pretty decent IMO. If you are f2p and you want to play high tier, you have that option without spending any money. That would just mean you spend more time playing more low/mid tier games to grind credits or other options mentioned in the numerous posts above this. If you don't want too then spend some money getting a high tier premium ship which can generate decent credit income, premium time etc. Again you are not forced to play high tier games. I mean there are some players who spend their time only playing low tier games and are happy there.

Well, just don't play tier 10 or high tier ships i guess. No one is forcing you to do so. Stick to mid tiers and you won't lose money.

For the blue of our world we have to kill those coordinators.

I'm sorry but who are the guys that said its difficult or impossible to play a DD in a 2 CV game because of constant spotting and the damage a CV can do to a DD? 3 solo caps in a 2 CV game. 3!!! 20190601_235440_PZSD108-Hsien-Yang_15_NE_north.wowsreplay

a) A lexi is not a bottom tier CV. Its the same tier as my hsien yang. Are you going to call midway a tier 4 CV next b) And as a follow up on being the "top tier" DD, i wish to point out that i shot down 0 planes, relying only on smoke, map awareness and the air cover provided by my kind CV. So i could have in a tier 6 DD, the bottom tier for this match and end up with the same result. c) Both enemy CVs played decently but got bad teammates who were too spread out. They did their best to help shore up the weak spots but it was an uphill battle for them. Meh, people sure can give alot of excuses. First CVs are OP. When you show them CVs are not really OP, they start flinging out "Oh you weren't up against a unicrum or super unicrum"

It is Oh yah, AA really does "spawn" randomly in smoke. Saw it in this game. That people who whine too much about it being unplayable can't be bothered to try?

I've got noting against you mate, just wanna see it in black & white. I'll try it in game then.

You're just a necromancer you are.

Any evidence to back it up? Point me to it.

Its easier with AA because its more "constant" as compared to main guns where there is a "short delay", as least imo.

After the buff to DD air detection a CV literally has to fly over you to spot you unless you turned on your AA and it goes off, causing you to be spotted earlier. Then that is you fcking it up. In order to attack you then he has to: a) keep you spotted while lining up his attack; b) go into attack mode and line up his attack on you; WG made it so that lining up a rocket attack takes longer now. If you sail in a straight line and get hit then that is your fault for being lazy. Edit: To clarify, unless you are spotted, a rocket attack cannot reliably hit you unless the CV player is good with his guess work as the time needed to line up a rocket attack can take a fair bit too long. Even if say the CV let loose the rockets early, it will not be a well aimed attack. There is also the issue of a) cause to spot you (without AA on) he'll have to sacrifice a fighter. To avoid an attack, you have the option of either smoking up or make life difficult for the CV player attacking you by moving wildly.

No its not funny. Its an actual tactic. 2 things: a) Your AA will give away your position much earlier than expected if it is turned on; and b) CV can hit you in smoke base on your AA tracer. Unless it really is inevitable (No smoke and CV dropped a fighter over you), you should switch your AA off to avoid being targeted. Turning on AA is like saying to the CV "I'm here, come and attack me". Make yourself a difficult target and the CV will most likely give up because time is damage. I've had CVs focus me but give up cause I make it extremely difficult for them to target me. So they go and fry other fishes instead.

The difference between whiners like you, and a player like him, is that he has a far more balanced view of things: People like you are the worse sort.

It really depends I guess. Some people play as per normal, some specifically target their clan members while some just ignore them or play to lose. I had a game recently where my friendly Zao spent the entire game camping with me at the back of the map on the same flank as a 3 men division of his clan. He even used me as a shield when we ended up as the last 2 ships alive on our team. And i was playing my Midway. I didn't say anything and just reported him. These kind of players deserve to be banned imo.

1) I use the rudder shift mod 2 on my Kurfurst. At least my rudder reacts faster, which translates to better manouverability, allowing me to froe example, torp beat better. 2) That leads on to when you should show your broadside etc. Only a CA firing HE? Ok to show broadside. Enemy BB on your flank? Only after he fired his salvo on you. That sorta thing.

@El2aZeR

Get a full stealth built, stick only to AP and make use of islands. Think of it as heavily armoured and gunned british CA (cause of its CA like detection). Basically smack stuff with AP, cloak, reposition, smack stuff with AP, clock reposition.

1) Get the rudder shift mod if you don't have it. 2) Train your map awareness. At the spot you are at/travelling towards to, what can hit you? Then manouvre accordingly.

I actually do swap to AP..........occasionally when things get serious. But HE spamming is pretty fun though. The thing about British BB (from tier 8 at least ) is to make use of their stealth, dump your shells and disappear at range. You can tank damage from tier 9 with the super heal, but nothing too excessive. Given that, for me HE is more suitable I feel, because i know that Im more or less able to do some damage as compared to AP, which may bounce or not penetrate.