Earl_of_Northesk

Weil NOCH mehr BB's dem passiven Meta sicher gut tun würden, richtig? Wieder nur 3 Meter weit gedacht

Eben nicht, sie ist volle 5 Jahre älter als die St. Louis Klasse. Und das in einer Zeit, als Schiffe schon nach zwei Jahren veraltet sein konnten. Die 171, entwickelt zu Ende des ersten Weltkrieges, passt da schon besser. Sie ist letztlich Caledon und Tenryu sehr ähnlich, denen sie auch zeitlich näher ist als die Dupleix der St. Louis

While the gun fired a rather heavy shell in later life, she also had the by far slowest velocity of all T8 203mm guns. As far as I know, the penetrations suffered while the reload never reached the projected number. I think the guns are more suited for T7

Die Dupleix fällt einfach aus dem Timeframe, die Bewaffnung is the außerdem eher T2. 6 uralt-Geschütze pro Breitseite (weniger, denn du das Pech hattest, gerade gewendet zu haben) sind etwas mau.

Wäre eine Möglichkeit

Etwas schwierige zu Balancen. T5 vielleicht, aber danach wieder ein 152mm Kreuzer?

Das Problem ist, dass die Franzosen ihre Kreuzer mit gemixter Hauptbatterie gebaut haben, zB 4x7.6 inch 16x6.5 inch. Das ist einfach nicht umzusetzen. Die Quinets sind für T3 einfach zu stark

Algeries guns are just pretty terrible. You could have buffed her up to T8 for sure, but that would have meant having Suffren at T7 which just won't work with her kind of armour

Es gibt exakt 0. Aber ja, dieses Projekt ist die Basis.

Die Franzosen haben schlicht keinen realen Kandidaten für T3, deswegen wurde wohl Design 171 genutzt

Kreuzerschwemme? Spielst du dieses Spiel?

It doesn't kill my system, but it still seems to break down on closing sometimes.

We have too much BB's? What is this heresy?

Their problem isn't the lack of stealth firing, but the unnecessary penalty way beyond their firing range. They still perform tbh. They are just not fun to play.

Akizuki is one of the very, very few ships in the game which may need it. It will likely still perform very well without it. Hold on before you make conclusions. I play almost all my DD's without stealth fire and I would say they don't suffer too much.

It seems you guys are right. At very low speed this can happen. Never personally experienced this tbh. It's at 9:26.

Are you sure? That is not how wargaming themselves explain ramming damage in their wiki and I haven't ever personally experienced this.

On another note: Someone reports something and has ACTUALLY ENABLED REPLAYS! Give this man a f*cking medal!

You should be able to upload it here. If you click on "more reply options" under your answer field in this thread, there is an "Attach Files" option. I will then have a look at your replay.

You are right. Do you have a replay for that battle? That shouldn't matter.

That flag should have reduced the damage by only 20%, which would still be enough to sink an already damaged Amagi. If it really was the Amagi he rammed, this case is a bit strange.

Well I suppose the Amagi wasn't on full health then.

What was your ship even? And no, you do 100% of your full HP as damage. Nothing changed.

I'm sorry to bring this up here, but..... dat double strike

We were able to get Katori in a set of missions which NA never got. So it's evened out now.