robihr
Players-
Content Сount
3,168 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
9352
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by robihr
-
btw yes i know warships.today doesnt have all data, but it is enough to prove a point is CV player pool small? yes are few skilled players significantly affecting CV stats? yes are few skilled players significantly affecting yamato stats? no do leaderboards show that both CV and yamato can pull of comparable average damage? yes does yamato have more tomato players than hakuryu? yes
-
it was 2 weeks, not 1 week. and first 3 players make 10% of the games in haku, so yes stats are skewed. leaderboards for haku in last week. filter over 10 battles played stats with over 25 battles played those with over 25 battles played make more than 1/3rd of all battles played in hakuryu over last week. so yes few players can make huge difference in stats. yamato has 10x more players, and a lot more casual players than hakuryu. nowadays casual players dont even get close to higher tier CV, but they sure take their yamato. like i said before stats are abusable, cause ppl read them how they want them. btw here are leaderboards for yamato: 10 battles 25 battles
-
yes i am
-
sure lets compare stats. lets take haku with 106k average damage do you know how many ppl have over 106k average damage in hakuryu over last 2 weeks? 25 do you know how many ppl have over 106k average damage in yamato over last 2 weeks? over 50 (could only see top 50 in avg damage for last 2 weeks) montana? 40 zao? 40 midway? 12 khabaravosk? 3 for the n-th time. you cant compare stats if you dont have enough data. if you had lots of yamatatoes in hakuryu, you would get bad average damage in hakuryu. those 25 players are only thing keeping the average of hakuryu "average". get the first 2-3 players not to play hakuryu for 2 weeks, and average damage of hakuryu will drop to below 100k. if you get first 2-3 yamato players to stop playing yamato, you wouldnt affect the average much, if at all.
-
i would for once like someone actually play at least one battle in ship they say is OP.
-
idk if anyone has noticed it, but torpedoes pass through wreckage of destroyed ships(while they are still on surface). is this intentional or is it a bug?
-
games in shimakaze=0
-
why? we are all enjoying it i would like for mods to pin it so we can laugh little more
-
Which forum members have you seen in random battles?
robihr replied to Cobra6's topic in General Discussion
seen cro_pwr today. our both teams sucked, but his sucked more -
most fun answer from support
-
-
-
Can I please not get teammates with below 50% winrate
robihr replied to juan_de_sluipschutter's topic in Archive
so most [edited] will move to ranked? have nightmares from last ranked.. -
training room? that is only thing i could think of for getting 0 xp
-
so how long will this thread last?
-
no i just hate ignorant opinions that repeat in this thread for 26 pages. i really like when ppl say that CV are OP when they havent played any higher tier battles in CV, or even any battle in CV? CV are OP on low-mid tiers where most ppl cant dodge, AA is non existent, usage of DF is questionable and there is no smart usage of enemy fighters. but then again on those tiers most players dont even know how to properly use CV. read this thread and see that random ppl who didnt even read this thread just drop in saying that CV are OP for whatever reason (even though most of those reasons were discussed at first few pages of this thread), while having absolutely no experience in higher tier CV (which this topic is about), or even any CV experience. then few ppl who actually play CV try to explain why CV are not OP on higher tiers, but are ignored by those ppl.
-
You did not prove yourself in this battle
robihr replied to mavericksama's topic in General Discussion
http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/52653-you-have-not-proved-yourself-in-this-battle/ -
i am just waiting for another person who didnt read thread and didnt play CV, to leave comment how CV are OP so we can have another 10 pages of same discussion...
-
there are WG employees here. just that they are here mostly to handle and pacify the public.
-
Someone forgot to adjust 'Situational Awareness' in 0.5.5
robihr replied to WhiskeyWolf's topic in General Discussion
considering that detection and rendering have been desynced in last update, everything is possible. -
Someone forgot to adjust 'Situational Awareness' in 0.5.5
robihr replied to WhiskeyWolf's topic in General Discussion
we all know that they didnt change anything in code for that to be the problem. it was like that for years. -
did you have to pay fine for causing team damage? and did you get fine back?
-
carriers havent been buffed once since the start of open beta. they only saw nerfing with every patch or 2. and now you want them even more nerfed... CV need limited MM with +/-1 tier. and AA/planes balanced on ships on those tiers.
-
5.1 is last one i remember and idk if there were nerfs later on manual drops. so half a year ago.
-
they nerfed manual drop so many times, and you want it nerfed yet again?
