robihr
Players-
Content Сount
3,168 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
9352
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by robihr
-
Irrevocable rank 12 not best solution. One more irrevocable rank REALLY needed.
robihr replied to albinbino's topic in General Discussion
extra star for top performer in winning team is viable solution for increasing economy. -
create another account for testing.
-
said that cause WG is famous for listening their community. specially when ppl say they will not play until they fix smth...
-
so seems like we wont be seeing you ingame
-
Who was the "wise" guy that made the new upgrades in the last patch?
robihr replied to Anthoniusii's topic in Archive
if we are talking about range lets talk about how kirov outranges mogami, or how MK vastly outranges any other t8 ca. -
Irrevocable rank 12 not best solution. One more irrevocable rank REALLY needed.
robihr replied to albinbino's topic in General Discussion
if there was any irrevocable rank that is needed it is rank 5. -
number of mistakes they do is telling me that they dont learn a thing. they only know a mistake when it comes biting in their [edited]
-
another myoko? well at least it isnt another kongo
-
i wouldnt be so sure of that now
-
now they are allowing saipan/blyska/indianapolis to run the show
-
seems like potatoes caught up with rank 10...
-
cause with every nerf lots of below average player stop playing. we want to make changes so it is more noob friendly. i repeat IT IS NOT ABOUT CREATING OP CLASS (something you really dont get no matter how much we write about it). that is why lot of CV players would agree to reduce torpedo damage in exchange for less AA. this is not just buff the CV, but AN EXCHANGE. how much to decrease AA and how much to decrease torpedo damage i would leave to WG, but certainly there needs to be some noob friendliness in playing CV. i am ok with using average damage to nerf/buff class but only when there is enough players playing it. balancing class on high skilled players that make "average" is just making CV play even more noob unfriendly.
-
that is exactly what i wanted to say.
-
but all those ships have noticeable upgrade. yamato gets 23% better hp, guns that can penetrate everything angled, upgrade in armor and doubled torpedo protection. DM gets over double DPM over baltimore zao gets little better reload, little better damage per shell and gets boosted shell speed that makes it like you are shooting lasers at anything (so effectively accuracy upgrade). montana gets 22% better hp, extra turret, better armor. if you check leaderboards(last 2 weeks) of izumo and yamato, you see that yamato does perform better than izumo for about 50% if you check leaderboards(last 2 weeks) of ibuki and zao, you see zao performs about 40-50% better than ibuki. if you check leaderboards(last 2 weeks) of baltimore and DM, you see DM performs about 40-50% better than baltimore. but checking leaderboards from above post you see that difference between hakuryu and taiho performance is less than 10% (didnt include haxtesy cause i dont believe anyone else can do same average damage as him). so again why is hakuryu performing so much better than taiho? other ships have noticeable upgrades from t9 so that can easily explain upgrade in avg damage, but hakuryu doesnt. btw i said top 3 players, not 6% and i was explaining how big impact few players have in regards to playerbase and why is it so bad to use stats that were derived from such small playerbase. that is why i compared that if 3 top players from haku and yamato stop playing the game for a week or two, haku damage would fall for some 7-8k damage, while yamato avg damage would hardly move.
-
fuso could use a buff. it is really a bad ship
-
-
but if they kill me, they must have cheats...
-
Being able to play with players of your own skill level
robihr replied to loppantorkel's topic in General Discussion
it is too private if only few know it exists -
Being able to play with players of your own skill level
robihr replied to loppantorkel's topic in General Discussion
why dont you set aside some time when most ppl will be on to play like 20:00 or 21:00 CET. that would take care of long waiting times.. -
i like it how he ignores every suggestion made in here to improve CV play and just spouts CV apologist want to bring CV meta back. trade-offs were suggested for reduce in AA, but he doesnt read that, he just reads CV apologist say CV are UP and want back OP CV. it is hard to explain something to him when every well reasoned argument by people who play CV is shot down by him by calling everyone CV apologists. like i said before to avenger121 to play some CV at least till t7-t8 and then discuss what is wrong with CV. cause every time i see someone use terms "CV apologist" i see someone actually saying "I am really stupid".
-
this is what this topic looks like to me
-
someone who hasnt learned to play the game is hardly someone capable of judging if someone is cheating or not.
-
he has thousands of battles
-
you really need to start watching youtube videos on how to play. you stats are so bad that bots can outperform you. start here: http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/forum/174-newcomers-section/ and here: http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/forum/499-ships/
-
if you want to see his stats https://warships.today/player/507353297/eu/avenger121 and i agree that he needs to play CV. maybe then he will stop making such posts
