robihr

[edited]

nuff said

there are no potentially stupid questions. there are only (potentially) stupid answers.

you need to have sexy butt and know how to apply it

guide to play colorado: 1. you get colorado to 10km away from enemy ship 2. shoot 3. profit

rocks cant stop real men.

lo yang is benson, so...

6km away from montana and he used AP? i would use torps...

and almost impossible on high tiers.

try this http://forum.worldofwarships.com/index.php?/topic/38129-playing-on-a-mac-dstuds-guides-and-troubleshooting/page__pid__975245#entry975245

i agree. clear sky is almost impossible to get nowadays unless CV suicides all his planes against higher tier ships, or AA ca. floating planes shouldnt be included in requirements for clear sky cause it is almost impossible to kill them in CV without losing all your fighters due to AA, or in any other ship cause you need to be way too close to enemy for your AA to kill them.

i had disconnections, but they were mostly all cause of my side. few times there was actually server disconnect, but that was when server worked badly and needed restart. usual cause for disconnects is router reconnect for renewal of ip address (last about 1-2 minutes every 24 hours), or any other router/isp problem. i would recommend you get some network diagnostic program that actively monitors your connection to see if problem is on your side.

just to clarify myself. i meant stat bashing to prove that they are lying, not stat bashing to prove that they are bad player. whenever someone makes wild claims i approve bashing.

i just remembered the topic about toxic community and people using stats... guess what? when someone says they have 108 losses in a row, you use stats to bash them. edit: and prove that they are lying

well.. we dont have enough kongos ingame

1. this is not simulation 2. realism ≠ fun

from 19% to 22%. 15% increase in fire chance, so yeah it is worth it.

i just think it is just old fuckup at stake. they put hiei instead of some other ship. wait and see when will WG fix it.

nah.. just WG employee with access to database

worst thing about shima wasnt nerf of torpedoes, but TA that was default for every shima captain. 9.6km torps were borderline shitty, 16km torps were truly shitty and 6.4km torps were suicidal. 12km torps were usable and that is that. gearing has better torps now than shima and that is telling much...

well shima definitely isnt fun after the nerfs and gameplay wise shima wasnt the problem. 5-6 dd per team was.

not always. remember the shima

best way to see performance is to compare leaderboards of each perspective ship cause in most cases represents what the ship is capable of. . in last 2 weeks best avg damage(with more than 10 games played): for khaba is 129k for gearing is 97k for shima is 89k if we take it to 25 battles played, difference is even worse, but you can notice that khaba has more constant damage vs shima and gearing that have more variable damage(cause they rely on torp damage). also khaba with its damage output is comparable to t10 CA. is that good thing? idk, but personally i would slightly nerf khaba and buff shima so they can be closer to gearing levels of performance..

only problem with khaba is that it is classified as dd when it is clearly cl.

to actually grasp mechanics of class and what is actually wrong with it, you need to play that class. if you are only on receiving end of it everything will seem valid point that nerfs the other class. take shima for example. while it has scary max potential damage, but its average damage wasnt that good before nerfs cause people actually dodged and after the nerfs it is simply terrible. it was more scary in terms of damage potential and area denial than it was in actual damage done. did it need nerf? no it didnt. but WG listened to players who didnt own shima and complained it was OP. problem was never in shima, it was in 5-6 dd per team. but instead of limiting dd to max 3, they nerfed shima that actually didnt need nerfing. so tell me valid points that mostly BB players were talking about shima?