havaduck

Tier 1? Thats asking to be ramed/trouble. Way better to play a CV in co-op. Most immediate? 1. Ramming cant cause a TK - simple. 2. Ramming does not keep you from loosing TK-status in battles wihtout (other) teamdamage. Even simpler. (Although there are certain people, even on this forum that need to be trolled with a Pinky-ram ...... so that would be kinda a loss there as well ) €: How to do it? How about, remove (friendly) ramming damage from the game? It serves no purpose anyway ....... Phew I am exhausted; that did take me like 1/10 second to figure out ....... lets see how much time it will WG take to realise and implement.

*scnr*

True but pressing 3 again already toggles the spread of the torps ...... So if they switch that I will be screwed up even more. You know what the worst part is? Say you have AP loaded, and want to switch to HE (or vice versa), so you press "1" to automatically load it AFTER firing the current shells. Then you check the torps, and when going out of torp-view you even remember what key to press to get to the shells you want. But oh noes! You then pressed "1" two times in total and a full god damn reload cycle starts. I hate that ......

Oh come one. So far I have been pink 3 times for tking (at least after the TK rework and from what I can remember): 1. Hit a ally bot dd for less 200 dmg after he and the enemy DD slowed down in front of each other. In his case: right under my shells. 2. Ramming while the ally lost the last few hp points -> tk. 3. Trying to save a Chester from a bot Tachi-banana while he was dying to a torp salvo: 2 he shells did hit him between torp hits -> tk. Yeah ofc the system is suboptimal ..... but hey you are playing a WG game. Sub-parity is basically the unofficial motto of this game: From "Eu-Server compared to NA, RU", over "human player playing this games compared to the bots" to "silver peasant-ships to p2w-masterrace-boats". You have to remember that its just a warning. Nothings going to happen unless you act careless. Just play a few more games ... and you will be unpink. To summarize:

[edited]

I dont even know what to say .......... http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/9009-what-were-your-greatest-gaming-achievements-today/page__st__3000__pid__1457697#entry1457697 ....... wait I actually I know what to say, but that would make me look like adoring a certain " body of thought". So I just leave this here, to do the talking for me: The next guy that tells the story of co-op being easy with complete and utter human waste on your side, while you dont get even 25 % rewards, gets flamed hard by me. I mean that.

So after being torped (by friendlies fucktards ofc) in every single game I played (save the one below), I just rage quitted. YES, THATS A LOSS. AGAINST: BOTS! So one idiot in the Fuso is offended from the start about my Bismarck. I think his exact word was "bis-noob". Ofc he was the very first guy to die without achieving anything, what else? 100 games in pvp scraping around 50 % WR. Other Fuso ofc also completely useless and only managed to cap which was uncontested by the bots. I guess he was really saving his HP (by staying so far away he had to use the spotter plane, on freaking upgraded Fuso!) for the crucial moment of the game! - just as we will see. Meanwhile: After winning the duel with 2 Fusos, I am now in a meele with ........ well the rest: A Hipper, a Atlanta, a NM and 2 freaking Bismarcks. Considering I sunk all but 1 of them, I think I won that duel as well. Thing is: You burn ..... a lot. And you have to dodge torps with means giving broadside = massive AP dmg. Then there are BBs on multiple vectors ...... which is even more massive AP dmg. So I died ...... I pretty much had too take the melee since this human waste of a team only managed to secure 1 cap (the uncontested one) while the bots had 2. Since most of the worse-than-bots were dead too, we were actually in danger on loosing on pts! Meanwhile the Fuso was cautiously creeping around ... he could have helped me but ...... nah ..... saving his HP for the final engagement ......... in which the Bot quickly and merciless put the idiot down like disease ridden cattle. Sorry for the insult towards the cattle. .... but yeah epic reward system WG! I probably lost even silver from that match, while the the-worse-than-bots-brigade gets 200 xp for breathing, fapping, and drooling over the keyboard simultaneously. Looking at the retraction of the 50 % battle fee cashback in co-op, and the rewards handed out for killing basically the whole enemy team alone: You are shameless and without even the pretence of dignity.

Wait until you see the players ingame! Torping/TKing their allies without a care, clue or remorse.

WP, wp good Sir. Have a free game to continue playing. (p2w free! - at least for the moment^^): http://foe.ucoz.org/pfe.html (dont forget to switch to english in the upper right hand corner, everything will be self explanatory with a little bit of trial and error; but you can always ask me too ;))

Yeah BigBoobs-1 Indiana commissioned 1895. Definitely new. You might want to hold on to your soul, or else some Camera might steal it. But hey we are getting closer to your time frame of service. We have it narrowed down to somewhere between 1775-1895. Do we get 10 questions? Ill start: Where you in the Navy before, during or after the Secession War? In total: Come one, you are letting yourself go. I expect better quality entertainment from a troll. €: (Seems like AO and me were thinking in the same direction^^)

You know, the old: The club cant even handle my h4x right now! Plz tell me you did troll the living crap out of him. ^^ (I can all of a sudden understand why he gets trolled with invites so hard, I have to remember that one. )

That and high tier in general. Every time you go out with something like Cleveland you can bet on at least 4 enemy Tirpitzes.With that you are set up for a bad game anyway, but gl & hf if your share of Tirpitz-Players is < bots. btw: we need to re-stir the shi7-storm for co-op in general as WG has pulled back that entirely viable solution of 50 % battlefee cashback - without a word ofc. Just the usual policy of middlefinger-first.

I can remember which one, but WG thinks Users either dont need or dont want a depot (with a UI and everything) ...... or both. Ofc its BS, but I am not trying to justify it, I am just conveying the message.

A few corrections here: The Kami R was on sale too, right after the event. Its only the first post in this thread, so the part about blindness becomes quite ironical, doesnt it? Here, have even the entry on the main page: http://worldofwarships.eu/en/news/premshop/gem-of-the-month-kamikazer/ The truth is: Some ships are such a disgusting OP-p2w-Cancer that you cant. You chances of winning against a even blow average guy in OP-erator, while sailing the Myogi are beyond slim. Now, and this might be news to you, also very experienced people buy the p2w-boats. If Marvin is sailing the OP-erator and I am in a Myogi I cant kill him - simple as that; even if I had 3 re spawns. The same way I cant win against a player slightly worse, when I am in a Mogami against a Takao. Now the Game is not only 1 vs 1. So the Takao player, if even remotly skilled, has a way more easy time doing well than a Mogami player in general. Whether or not the Takao is OP or not is irrelevant to question of p2w, as that is solely tied to being a bought advantage silver-peasants. 1. I bought "1" (thats ONE) ship to see if my Opinion was justified: The Murmansk. You can consider that a biopsies to acquire a sample of the tumor that is the p2w-cancer in this game. Histology: My opinion is way beyond justified since its simply better in every way without drawbacks (maybe the missing spy-plane?) compared to the Omaha. I cant play this ship now (outside co-op) because I consider it p2w. Unlike others, I act accordingly to what I say. 2. I will never ever buy a ship I consider p2w after the Murmansk experiment. 3. Seeing how much this p2w game now is, I wont even buy premiums that are the farthest from being p2w like ......... the Mikasa. I love that ship, and would have loved to buy it when it was on discount not to long ago; but with them going full p2w? Never - they can shove a whole Italeri-Kit of the Mikasa up till they reach their Bulbus duodeni. 4. You might want to further point at p2w ships I "bought", and I will tell you where and when I did get them, WITHOUT the use of my wallet, and if they can be argued p2w at all. Wrong again. I division regularly with people that pretty much own all the premiums, and I dont hate them. I solely blame WG for this whole situation. On the other hand I wont let false statements, like those which am correcting the whole time here (like only the Kami-nonR being sold), stand uncommented and uncorrected. Thus even if, lets say Marvin (which I like), would say the OP-erator is not p2w: He can certainly expect me to argue against that. So to summerize: I give WG the crap, but if you expect to walk by me and spouting nonsense how the Indi is not p2w, while the Pensa is in its current state, you can expect me to have a answer for you.

Damn! I can only like AOs post once - so have it expressed here again. Where is that actually from? btw : ^-- _!_ NOT a picture of my arm _!_

Now, there there, dont think to fast or you might hurt yourself. I am now following the entertainment, and right now I am certainly not angry, but rather: .... for there is now a new post of my favourite Pinky-Player of certainly epic new proportions. Cant, having to much fun, and a surplus of Pony-pictures. .... Ofc only until BBV wakes up and locks the whole thing down. ;)

The bots now try to evade collision. There was this thing: 2 BBs going at each other, both keeping angled .... ram. Now even DDs will slow down in front of another. Thats only friend/foe. Friendly bots try to stay out of each other was, unfortunately this can lead to a block-cascade in which you have 5 ships dead in the water going slowly back and sometimes forwards a little again.

TRUE! I remember having the same problem, of only seeing the localized version, until I figured out how to switch it permanently to english. As long as you dont clear the browser chache or whatever, you should be able to select the default language to be displayed. But still, if you want complete and accurate information on eg a upcoming patch, you still gotta visit the NA or Sea page. The only way to solve this will probably be for plate tectonics to form a new super continent; only for WG to invent new BS why we get to still always draw the short straw.

[edited]

Thats because the Kamkaze is not p2w YET. Its the BS "we dont change premium" ship that might get her to p2w status. Is that so difficult to understand? If yes, than think of it like some continental drift on earth. All the plates move around, and while its still the same earth ........ Well, lets just say I would love to see if you call the cold "OP" when you visit the "lush rainforest" in Antarctica right now, dressed in a light tropical suit. Since you have so good ties to wg, or maybe had them (dunno) I make you a offer: Argue for them to let any player choose which ship to play, tech tree OR counterpart - ofc without the inherent premium ship bonuses like: free captain choice, more xp, better captain training. I guarantee you some ships will basically NEVER be played again. Also we would then need to balance certain ships like OP-erator or Grmelin ........ or, geeee all the p2w ships that even need a balancing right now anyway? In some cases the premium ship might even be allowed to stay as the are. Its the silver ship thats in dire need to be buffed. Also: The fact that a stupid wallet warrior can die even in a p2w ship is a argument I thought unworthy of you, but I stand corrected, I see. Well I might die to some Omi guys in the Yamato if they are sailing the Amagi. Therefore my "Musashi" should be at T 8, give better cred, xp, captain training and ah price of 500 doubloons would be nice. I am the only one that gets one - so they just need to stop selling them after I got mine; that would be even better. /s Are you truly thinking a tech tree equivalent of the OP-erator would be as good at least as the p2w boat (It should be even better, but thats another story)? Like the Gnevy is to Gremlin, like Pensa is to Indi, like Mogami is to Tako, etc? Do you believe that truly and deeply? After the OPerator is so p2w and OP they themselves cant even justify to sell it? If your answer is yes, my answer is what can be only received as an insult, so I will refrain form typing that down.

And heres the problem. Reality is as you described, Bismarck would be an example. So thats reality, but we play a arcade game ....... where it is utter an complete BS balance wise for some sections to receive shell/torp eating god mode while the rest of the ship is even 100 % operational and merrily dishing out the pain. Reduced damage? Yes. Godmode: No. Yes its that easy, which is why WG cant figure it out themselves. Another issue are the turrets: Now the permanent destruction that stripped some ships of any offensive capability on first hit was BS, so they fixed it. In the most noob-manner possible, because now the turrets just eat the shells, while rarely ever getting disabled or destroyed. I guess the Turrets + Gun house going down to the magazines dont contain anything important on a warship? I suppose the Birdcrap on the masts registering a overpen contains way more important stuff. Penetrating damage to turrets still should cause some damage (I am not even talking about full) to the parent ship instead of providing another layer of god mode. Since it takes only a 6 year old to figure that out and include it in the permanent destruction fix, there is no hint when, if ever, WGs gonna figure that out.

Very convenient then, since they can all*1 pop out of any "earned" container, isnt it? *1: Even those that are so grossly OP-p2w-cancer even WG cant stand their own faces in the mirror any more enough to keep selling them. Well I guess we have disagreeing opinions then. I see myself out then, and I will certainly continue labeling any p2w-boat I see accordingly.

Oh wow there are so many things together, but I will dissect it for you piece by piece. 1. I "earned" mine to in the R-event. That still doesnt make me think I should be immune to rebalance esp. if the whole line gets reworked. But you are right: That would it only make it potentially OP compared to the silver ships, unfortunately there is 2. 2. This ship was on sale. Yes, WG decided on another feat of incredible stupidity to not sell the Fujin or the Kami -nonR, but to sell the Kami R, right after the event. Now this is where it turns into a p2w-boat if its OP compared to the silver ship after the changes. Also, if you get out the freaking OP-erator out of a container, because you "earned" the container, the whole ship stays both a disgusting OP p2w boat and a testament of how shameless WG can get, esp if it was a Russian disaster site in RL. 3. If you think your ship is resilient to re-balance and re-work just because you "earned it" is even more hilarious, than the wallet warriors and their "I payed for it". Guess what? I never bought premium time, so I "earned" all my sliver ships. So I guess on those ships only buffs are allowed, and nerfs forbidden right? 4. I let my prejudice roam free and DID check your port. Lets just say, I rest my case, because I cant see you running around objecting to changes on "earned silver ships". Im mean geee, 300 games in Gremy, 25 in Gnevny - all that while the Gnevny is such a superior ship in term of raw stats, earning and captain training. You must be such a masochist to play the worse ships that goes 1 knot slower .... compared to Gnevny while all the "advantages" the Gremlin gets which are ....... well there arent any I suppose. /s And that Gremlin is just the tip of the iceberg ......

.... and argue. Never forget the arguing. I plan on giving them crap as long as the situation persists or I am banned; and I am working on both. Should I take a look at your port or can I spare myself the work? If anything WG can start reworking Kami the same moment when the other changes on IJN DDs hit. I actually liked that ship and consider it not (or only slightly thanks to the inherent bonuses of a premium) p2w because its not better than Minekaze. If they change Mine/the T 5 and make Kami p2w I consider that robbery for I can no longer play it. You know, that BS argument the wallet warriors use whenever they fear their p2w-toy might get touched. Next on the list is the Murmansk. I have that p2w-ship too, and there is 0 reason to play a Omaha over it. The other way around: There a quite a few things making Murmansk p2w without any drawbacks. Being finished with those 2 ships, you can consider that a neoadjuvant therapy against the p2w-cancer that the Devs willingly brought into this game, and start with the real work.

Theres a shocker! Yeah to bad ........ for people like you. Now thats the entertainment I was looking for Mr. Seagull. So I take you had enacted a "no survivors"-policy to prevent them from being a "squealer" when inflicting friendly fire during your time in the Navy? I have even the perfect ship for you, when it comes as premium (and by now, I know it will totally be new information for you): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_William_D._Porter_(DD-579) Or was that one of the ships you already served on? Untrue. You did care when your Pinky-Pride-ship suddenly went *pooooooooooooof*. I sure hope it happens a lot more now that the only target you can hurt with careless and reckless conduct is yourself. If only your comrades in the Navy had the same luck ...... poor souls. He also got a Umikaze now. No doubt employing the same "unrealistic" and OP tactics as those bots. Unfortunately it earns him only 6k damage (less than his DDs health) on average so far, again: against bots! Thats a future Shima-player, spamming 20 km torps from behind his CV at 30 km targets, right there. Even more hilarious when going back to: I guess: "Kemp land, unfair pots"?