-
Content Сount
3,274 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
16879 -
Clan
[MBSSX]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by OldschoolGaming_YouTube
-
2 years posting, WG ingnoring
OldschoolGaming_YouTube replied to citaDELer's topic in General Discussion
I think you actually need to Dumb it down a bit more for the CV Masterrace, because obviously they have it too hard as it is. Maybe take away the actual ship for them all together so they can only focus on their planes in World of Warships? Just a suggestion. Because its is very hard to autopilot the ship to the top right corner, a process that takes about 3 seconds clicking on the minimap. -
April fools?
-
Axis vs Allies another well thought WG mode
OldschoolGaming_YouTube posted a topic in General Discussion
They really seemed to thought this one thru as well. Im guessing most players will play Allies.....? -
Before you consider buying Flandre ....
OldschoolGaming_YouTube replied to fumtu's topic in General Discussion
I pretty much count on the fact that WG will screw me over and change/nerf anything I buy from them in the future Premium, Special or silver so that's the reason I haven't bought anything from them in the last 3 years except for ships I have gotten for free with Free XP, coal or Steele. -
Lenin sends his regards to Marco Polo
OldschoolGaming_YouTube replied to EnacheV's topic in General Discussion
Regarding Marco, I just had e really bitter sweet moment. I received my first ship in 5 years in a ordinary crate and it was this. Probably the ship i wanted least of all possibilities, probably wanted Makarov more then this. So underwhelmed by the line and all streamers I seen that bought Marco think its bad A-F. So another ship that will collect dust in my port and never get played. Im guessing WG is throwing these out now in crates since no one is buying them. I mean, if Potato Quality of the 07 clan cant get this ship to work I think its pretts bad -
Is secondary skills getting a rework as well?
OldschoolGaming_YouTube posted a topic in General Discussion
@MrConway @Crysantos etc We heard you are taking Dead eye back to the drawing board to "tweak/nerf" it because of the new stupid Meta. You said that the goal with the whole captain rework (the official at least) was to make more optional builds for ships so it wouldn't be just one go-to build for one class which Dead eye pretty much resulted in. Does this mean you will take another look at the now days very nerfed and un-viable secondary build and make them more worthwhile to actually take? It's not fun to try and play a bit more aggressive, supportive, brawling playstyle in your secondary build BB when you have 1500 secondary shells fired in a game and only 300 hits and 2 fires. Did you actually considered the secondary builds pre-work to be so OP that they needed this nerf? Maybe it has drowned in the background of all the noise regarding the Dead eye skill but be sure that many BB players are upset of the current efficiency of secondary specced BBs What is your plan going forward? What build will be viable in your minds? -
You can watch complete model of the upcoming Russian carriers already today in the "Captain America and the Winter soldier" movie.
-
If I put it this way, I think very few players would be shocked regarding any new gamebreaking things you would choose to implement for carriers.
-
Is secondary skills getting a rework as well?
OldschoolGaming_YouTube replied to OldschoolGaming_YouTube's topic in General Discussion
Problem with this is that we currently only have 1 viable Meta build and that's Dead Eye. If WG tweaks/nerfs that we have no viable builds at all for BBs compared to what we had before rework. So then its just a Epic fail. Its not really rocket science for them to just nerf Dead Eye a bit to not make it mandatory for all BBs and all nations. Buff secondary's a bit so they don't just look like "lawn watering sprinklers" that sprays shells in all different directions except the target you are going for, and then maybe a tweaked-up tank build. I think this would satisfy most players and also make WG reach their goal with the whole rework. If they pay me with a Benham I can fix this in 2 days, even do some testing this time around. -
Don't compare DPM with gunboats, HP on torpboats is usually also a bit lower. Your a stealthy ninja that blows crap up!! Kagero is not the strongest boat in the line but the next one, Yugumo is a Beast that can devastate enemy teams if played well. Always go for TRB instead of smokescreens. Only pantsies are afraid of CVs!
-
Problem with making a aprils fools joke regarding carriers is that no one will get it..... because its a CV.....? "Oh a new CV with 15 km radar ...... of course ......" "Oh a new CV with small nuclear devices ....... of course ....." "Oh a new CV that flies in the sky and just drops down AP mines over half the map like carpet bombs ........ yeah .. i can see that in the game ......" "Oh a new CV that shoot lasers out of its bow ....... yeah, i think I read that in a history book .... " the "April joke" IS CV rework that we can enjoy the whole year around! So it doesn't really work as a joke. When it comes to CVs nothing is outrageous enough......
-
1 unique (one time) Token to buy any ship
OldschoolGaming_YouTube replied to EnacheV's topic in General Discussion
Anyone wanna trade their Benham for a Missouri, Belfast and Kutuzov? -
1 unique (one time) Token to buy any ship
OldschoolGaming_YouTube replied to EnacheV's topic in General Discussion
This! Sooo much this! Specially since WG did a real douchy move and made this a very short time event during summer when I was away with my family on holiday. This is the only thing that would make me open up my wallet to WG for the first time in 3 years. -
DDs without Survivability Expert?
OldschoolGaming_YouTube replied to GloomFD's topic in General Discussion
Been a DD Main since CBT 2015 (have almost Super Unicum PR stats as a DD player) and I would take SE on all my DD builds and for one good reason. If you are good at playing DDS and you actually manange to stay alive most games even to the end (which I do in most cases) you can carry more then half your team to victory with ease. Thats how strong potential DDs have when played well and thats why it hurt me that most teams dont understand to value their DDs lifes and actually help them out and keep them alive longer then first 4 minutes. I know there will always be really bad DD players that is impossible to save from their own stupid decitions but in many cases its the rest of the team hiding behind an island 15 km back and they push out their DD into the lions den that gets their DDs killed, to little teamwork. I have long time ago learned that I can never depend on my team or our CV for help and when you learn that as a DD players you start making better decitions and tactics and in this, you need every single point of HP you can get, because it what can make the difference between win or loss. Many games I won, last player standing with 300 or less HP. If I didnt have those 3500 extra HP at T10 I would die much faster, because even how good you play as a DD main you cant avoid everything, like for instance WGs retard stealthradar, retarded radars thru islands, hydro thru islands, CVs etc etc etc. (If all this works thru islands then why cant I send my torps thru islands as well WG?!?!) So yeah, SE is the best investment you can take as a DD player, regardless of DD build or type. Almost all other skills is much more situational and have less value. -
I hate DD divisions
OldschoolGaming_YouTube replied to RenfieldSyndrome's topic in General Discussion
Imagine Gearing-Wooster-Austin division. I play very safe every time I see a Austin or a Venezia on the other team in a DD. -
Axis vs Allies another well thought WG mode
OldschoolGaming_YouTube replied to OldschoolGaming_YouTube's topic in General Discussion
Its about a thing many streamers has pointed out that in the new Axis vs Allies mode it favours the Allies in a almost stupid way where all the Allies ships has all the radars, all the overmatch, all the AA, all the US DD smokes while the Axis has no overmatch, no AA, no radars etc etc. So its like a farmers team playing the Harlem Globetrotters ..................... with one arm tied behind their backs. So in short, another well thought thru thing coming out of WG, just like CV rework, captain rework, Smolensks, Thunderer, Dead Eye, Austin etc etc etc. So im guessing it will be like Co-op with all the real players on the Allies team and the Axis will be filled up with 1 tryhard and rest Bots. It just amazes me how you get the feeling that there is ZERO thought, testing involved in anything this company does and their game is still afloat. -
Vampire seems ........ balanced ..... A even stronger Daring with speed boost ....5.8 km concealment .... 5 km Hydro ..... Better reload then Daring .... AND Creeping smoke ... and 20 K damage torps in single fire ...... And a new Steal radaring Belfast copy at T8, with Smoke AND advanced Mino HEAL!? So you guys that missed out on old Belfast at T7, now its your time....
-
I'm always struggling with captain builds on my cruisers since the rework. Haven't touched Wooster in ages and wondering what builds you are running these days. Seems like IFHE is good at least...... What modules do you run?
-
Good captain/ship build for Wooster?
OldschoolGaming_YouTube replied to OldschoolGaming_YouTube's topic in General Discussion
eeeeh ........ *cough cough CV Mains ...cough cough...* BB Mains have their own firespam now with Dead eye Thunderer/Conqueror. Regarding IFHE yes/no, trying it out for now since Sailing Robin, Trenlass and a couple of more swears by it. But will probably try out another build in next captain rework/free respecc in a couple of month. -
I feel you bro! I also is trying to try Harding Secondary build on my Scharn, Mass and Georgia and soon also Pommern. In US BBs you get 25 % hits if you are lucky and those are the most accurate. My feelings is that even tho I have zero faith in WG, they just must do Secondary builds more viable in the new rework of the captain rework. Otherwise all BB builds are dead (tank, dead eye, secondary). So im somewhat hopeful for the future. Lets go secondary's ! ! !
-
Not knowing what you prefer but if you consider yourself to be above average cruiser player I would definitely try Austin.
-
Ohio vs Marco Polo -- Scandal
OldschoolGaming_YouTube replied to Ocsimano18's topic in General Discussion
Don't have either ship but going by the "popular" opinion (WoWs YouTubers and Streamers) they all Love the Ohio and Hate the Marco. But if you get it to work, good on you! Im not saying it is easy, but if you are good at reading the maps and the games, you can find ways and can make it work. These two games are from the last couple of days and both my Georgia and my Mass is Secondary specced. 1 Close quarters kill. Sure 104 secondary hits out of 676 shells fired isnt great, but still 23 K extra free damage .... and most important ... SUCH a Funny game to play... one of those games you started to play WoWs for!!! How many of those do one see these days? Georgia, 1 Close quarters kill. 140 out of 412 hits and 26 K free damage. Even if they are not as big of a threat as before they still work. Now I don't have much faith left for WG but considering they FUBAR:ed the entire Captain rework and now will go back the drawing board to fix Dead Eye and other skills I can't see any other option for them then to make Secondary builds viable again. So, I will continue to rock the Secondary build until they fix it. I won't find success in every game but win or loss I will have so much more fun playing the game than all those 500 XP Dead Eye sniping BBs on the A line. Right now I run secondary build on Mass, Georgia and even Scharnhorst after Potato Quality's recommendation (and its fun at T7), and when I get Pommern in a week or two I will go for a Secondary IFHE build on that as well. Unfortunately I don't own Ohio (would love that ship but hate the research bureau) so no Thunderer games here but if I did own it I would make it work at T10 as well. -
Considering your posts....... not much.... ?
-
Good captain/ship build for Wooster?
OldschoolGaming_YouTube replied to OldschoolGaming_YouTube's topic in General Discussion
Tell that to this guy I do kind of like garanteed damage over RNG based fires and with the firerate you will set fires as well. Is the rudder/engine so bad you need Last stand? -
New graphical changes are dumb and make no sense
OldschoolGaming_YouTube replied to cuddlesRO's topic in General Discussion
Its hard to tell if a torp is gonna hit you now days with new effects.
