Commander_Cornflakes

The 4 others are sunk already, they just left the game to port and started a new match.

Upgrade your potato. Or try it without any Mods in case you are using some.. If it really was the game producing this problem, we'd see far more threads like this one.

Was vermutlich eher daran liegt, dass jeder Kruppstahlfanatiker auf Secondaries skillt und Sachen wie Brandschutz vernachlässigt Edit: Aber wir schweifen ab, das ist ja hier der Roma-Thread und nicht der Brände-OP-Need-Nerf-Thread

Plunging Fire ist AP von oben ^^ Damit sind keine Brände gemeint, sondern dass die AP auf große Distanz, also wenn sie in einem steilen Winkel kommt, gut durch die schwache Deckpanzerung geht. Ich hab zwar mal eine Theorie gehört, dass HE bei Pens eine höhere Brandwahrscheinlichkeit hat als bei Non-Pens, was letztendlich bedeuten würde, dass Schiffe mit dünner Panzerung schneller brennen, allerdings weder eine offizielle Quelle noch sonstige Nachweise dazu. Also wohl wirklich nur eine Theorie.

Die Fire Protection ist doch eh tierstufenabhängig und nicht schiffsabhängig. Für T8 Premium ist der Faktor 0,6337, also 36,63% Brandschutz.

No, I don't think players like this will ever be able to learn anything. But I wasn't talking to them. I was talking to DFens_666. And he is good enough to be able to become even better.

No, you should watch them and learn from them. Not really OP, you don't get to use Missouris radar as often as you might think.

Not really, because your example can never happen with the current matchmaker. Toptier ships are exactly mirrored. Always. 3TX CAs vs 1TX CA is just not possible. (see https://worldofwarships.eu/en/content/update-notes-main/release-notes-058/#matchmaker )

Since when is T9 Toptier in a T10 Match?

Well, you did get a solo cap with your Yamato. But you are right, CV economy is bad

You are wrong, those videos were funny as hell Well, why do you think people subscribed to him? Because he is who he is or because he is who you want him to be? Obviously the first one and that means he should stay the way he is, because people subscribed to him because of that. That's Responsibility. He's not responsible to make you like him or his videos.

Wenn du ein Team mit anderen guten Spielern haben möchtest, warum machst du dann nicht einfach eine Division mit solchen Spielern und lässt die Randoms Randoms sein?

Making a DD waste one of his smokes is fine too.

That's simply not true. Toptier ships are always exactly mirrored. Toptier - 1 BBs are mirrored as well.

@medi0815

Well, I can't remember ever reading about this from official sources, I just saw some players talking about it. And it wouldn't make sense as the torpedo belt on nearly all ships goes down to the bottom of the ship.

Ich hab auch 5 Zeilen Ich würde dir einen kleinen Workaround empfehlen, du nimmst den Text, machst den mit Paint zu einem Bild und fügst das dann in deine Signatur ein ^^

Anshan as a premium ship won't change, the deep water torps are (currently) for the regular Pan-Asian ships only. And yes, it's basically: you can't hit DDs lower visibility (sonar still spots them normally though) you might not be able to hit cruisers (as that is what they are currently testing with Graf Zeppelin torps) The new DDs can't choose between Deep and Non-Deep torpedos (yet).

Maybe, but it's nothing a good player can't overcome.

@Capra76

Shoot his planes down and then continue to spot

Nope. Wargaming has the stats and they said the number of DDs does not have influence on the outcome of the match. Well, let's see: Nope, no complains here.

Only one cap and less than 4k spotting damage and you ask why you lost? You should realize that damage is not everything, especially in a DD.

Spam F3 on the Des Moines, focus the DDs and kill all the Enterprise planes (and don't waste your own planes to the Enterprise). Focus enemies and not caps. I don't really see a problem with the lineup.

Klar, hier: https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/forum/354-clan-rekrutierung/