Tanaka_15

Well tested it yesterady.New level of bordom. I think the gameplay of rankeds next week will be really new level of bad.

NO. but rest of your post is ok i would also dream of puting BBs in their own jutland mode.

And TBH dont you have a wierd feeling that fun has died in this game?

in a DD? Be more passive, do not push caps, do not spot stay with your bbs. Try to be as passive and usless as standard t10 kurfurst is. :)

it is. And i didnt hear any complains about CVs not focusing dds. But a lot of compplains aobut cvs in general.

Op forum players are not the target. This game is not beeing made for us, and we are not the main customers therefore our opionon dont matters. This game is made for Whale 45% WR with all the premiums in port and his opinion matters.

Cmone this is a computer game. Developer gives players broken ships players us it. I hate CVs as much as anyone but this is WG folt not players. Only hupe for subs failiure is that the gameplay of them will be realli boring.

End of day, it is not folt of smolensk players it is folt of the developer. thats said i hope the subs are sa boring as they seems to be.

I know one thing when wg force subs in random i will not hunt them in my dds. will just ignore them and play more passive :)

TBH whad wg says and what wg doeas is quite a difference. We will see how badly subs will be recpited in rankeds. I hope there is a chance of forcing it into us later than sooner.

There is no communication gap. Yeach if there is no communicatin there is no gap :D

Its not a failure as long as dont say it is!!!!

By the way, it is interesting how far can WG go to avoid admiting we failed with the class.

Glad you are grading it so high:) I do hope this ranked season will be a disaster and will put forcing subs into game on hold for some time

non. just dont play it.

Limit carriers to strong 0 per game!!!!

I meet them much more often still but i play t8-9 mostly maby thats why.

Remove them? remove ability to spot? (this would help a lot) Make AA effective? (this would help a lot) Yech that iteration was better cos there were less cvs, and CV coud lost all its planes. Basicly nerfing rockets was little step in right direction but class is still broken.

what this has to do with CVs? cvs are booring cos it is just flyw, drop get dmg fly again. BBs are all about postioning. This is totally different thing and you can conter bbs you cant counter CVs. and tbf, in my opinion BB gameplay is not about shooting :)

Only not. But they do consider popularity. Thats why we have so badly designed and balanced CVs in first place. And thats why subs will be disaster. how to force players to use boring class? make it op. You can see it in game.

well i could just point to your own stats but this would be low. There is just no counterplay to cvs. And we all know it, the cv gampely is boring, and cvs are gamebreaking for all other classes. In short the idea, implementation and balacing of CVs is just wrong. But well if you like it it is just interesting.

just wow. hehehe ok its good someone likes the changes. Damn good job.... well thast new. Smolensk? CVs? Petro? Skill rework? Yukon disaster? Santa Box disaster? Puerto Rico disaster? just few cases at top of my head. BTW most of the feedback to subs at this point is just "wg pls dont" ..

They ignore CCs, testers, players 800 pages of CV rework topic in forum and will ignore all feedback to subs, like to petro, smolensk and all other topics. I do admire your belive in them at this point.

WG listen to feedback

Rember WG will be like oh people play subs, subs are fine lets put in in randoms why even try to balance. just like CV rework, skill rework and all other bad decisions.