Admiral_noodle

More potatoes by ratio at high tier as people are grinding battleships? Thus less able to carry if your team is poor?

Cost to change MM for a week much less than benefit. Ergo won't happen.

At 6am with seeding disabled patch download took less than about 10 mins. I always update really early morning. For obvious reasons.

3 second rule doesn't apply to SA since 0.5.8. And you might need to know about the other thing keeping you detected that you don't see...

If you want to know the second you go undetected. It is a pain.

This is just like opening a new ride at a theme park. Everyone queues up then complains about the queues

Its not really all that strong. If someone keeps dodging when you fire don't fire salvoes.

I don't think I can comment on the tier 3 premium. Perhaps it's gone for "rework"... Would I recommend Scharnhorst? Personally I find it the best ship ever. I love cruisers but hate being randomly annihilated. I like BBs but hate their slow reload and general sluggishness. So if you want a hybrid between the two and know what to shoot with what shell type, and have good minimap awareness - she's the ideal ship. But remember you are not to fight enemy battleships on equal terms. But you don't have to!

Same. The medium package with doubloons and useful flags I got. The top package has too much fluff I can buy with credits anyway. And I don't care about a flag.

No idea how. I don't have nearly enough free XP. But then I grind a lot of lines and free XP upgrades. So I will do the same with the German BBs. Just not right now.

Personally when testing I found her to be the *least* situational ship I've ever played. She's a Swiss army ship.

Suggest people use their eyes and click "ships" before complaining. It's hardly dubious that WG will promote "specials". What company doesn't do this? I for one am please WG are sticking by their word and offering ships not only in bundles.

None of you are ever allowed to criticise seal clubbing ever again

@CinC - yes I already said I should have said NMM not RN It is rumoured that WG had issues getting RN ship data. What I find more likely is given the VOLUME of data sorting it all out and making a line would simply take more time than expected initially. Blaming NMM is indeed unfair and grounded in nothing. As is blaming WG

Agree with OP. It gets in the way of detected. I really should create a list of small things we'd like changed.

Ignore WR now so many people in new ships the carry potential is significantly reduced. Take out your favourite ship and sink inexperienced German bb captains. Remember they have generally poor torpedo protection and burn nicely.

I didn't specify "good" experiences...

I've decided that since I play all tiers I shall ignore tier 8+ credit income/loss. It is NOT a reflection of how well you did to win the game (Just lost 89k in a win in my Iowa. But I got surrounded by tirpitzes who were intent on charging and killing and not playing the domination mode!) Ferry, unless you're suffering from a low credit balance I would recommend also trying this. Your credit "score" is NOT repeat NOT an indicator of your contribution to the WIN, just an indicator of the damage you did.

So if I've had a rubbish game get an ally to finish me off to avoid my costs? Done with care a division could abuse the system. Less so now however because of the team killing changes. So maybe it could be reviewed.

Well isn't it good that you get to know if you might like it before you buy it? My bet is tomorrow. Because gamescon. Come buy right now! Though why the need to wait is beyond me.

...given how tiering works is any ship an upgrade? But it's about experiencing more of the game in the end not getting "better" ships.

You can thank him for publicising it. We were calling it that from day 1. Not sure who came up with it though but I suspect Jingles may have picked it up I had another suggestion but it didn't take

I know it's the museum I was just too lazy to type it out. I doubt they were being deliberately obstructive but the amount of information needed would have taken said museum time and effort to support WG in doing the leg work and consultancy. So they would likely have wanted to negotiate terms and conditions, taken time to go back and forth in that uniquely British way I'm very very aware of. So citing delays due to the NMM (ah I could have just done that!) seems more than plausible to me. I'm not saying it was or wasn't but I have no reason to doubt. I've tried to get a charity sponsored by my corporation and I'm still amazed how hard it was and how long it took to throw money at them.

What the RN will share with an individual freely for academic reasons is not the same as with an international company seeking to make a profit.

Maybe there will be another one in future if skills are changed again. Maybe