Admiral_noodle

I think it was 7v7. Limited to only one CV. Battleships and dds also restricted. The maps had cap points in the centre and you only needed to get to 750...

The Fuso is a wonderful ship! Gun bucket of doom! Don't take her out on the first hull, it's worse than the Myogi! Upgrade to the B with free XP if you can.

That makes me expert marksman in Tirpitz and terrible in Fuso. But Fuso does the damage... Depends on the BB. Gun bucket Fuso will always have a lower hit rate than a U.S. BB if you're playing her right. It also makes me poor in Cleveland, ok in Murmansk and Omaha and bad in Pensacola. However I will fire blind at DDs and other ships to put them off if I'm detected, and it helps. Mind you in not doing well in cruisers lately.

But you don't know what kind of bad player that CV is... Also xvm really ought to take account of ship class. If I'm in a battleship I seem to be dangerous. In a cruiser I am apparently useless

I'm up to 62% win rate... In battleships. 44% in cruisers. I really struggle to do damage in Cleveland but Fuso is up to 51k damage average. All my BBs damage are increasing. Mostly because I am copying Aerron's style of play in his battleship videos. I now go for the best targets first, usually side on cruisers - for the tasty citadels I'll let others finish off the scraps, if they survive. Then il take on BBs. And you know what that tactic whittled down the team numbers and it's getting me wins. And I'm perfecting the "hold off an entire flank in one battleship" play, firing and angling to BBs while smashing cruisers who come near. BBs are much fun! Cruisers... Ehhh. I can't hit destroyers for toffee and I'm either too far away or too close to battleships.

So not speed. Although just because it doesn't say it doesn't mean it's not trie

Trouble is when we win games I'm usually not in the top 3. I'll be in the top half. When we lose I am usually in the top 3! Maybe this means I'm a defender.

Depends how trigger happy you are as well as accuracy. I tend to try to take speculative shots of nothing else is available so my accuracy is around 28%

What they all said. Also even if you load HE you're not likely to blow him away in one salvo. You also say you turned to get your front guns to shoot him? At 6km! Are you suicidal? Sail away from the pest and use back guns only!! And BBs are I think possibly as good as CVs now. Cruisers are ok, though I can't get them to work. It's actually dds that are bottom of the pile.

Haha! Yes ranked is solo only. No divisions and much tighter MM. I've played them on PT and they are good games. Very stressful though because your contribution COUNTS from the first minute... You can't complain about MM or player skill after a while in ranked battles... I'm still winning in battleships and losing in cruisers. Go figure.

He knows how to cruiser it seems! Put my battleships with his cruisers and abolish the Myogi and we are getting somewhere I wish I knew why I suck on cruisers but not in BBs. We need more cruiser tutorials! I go in, get sunk by battleships...

Yeah this. It makes me play less sometimes. I need to stop caring about stats. Play well they will come themselves. Have faith.

I always stop of flooding. It does seem to slow it.

Good Iwon rate is weakly correlated to ability. However looking at all the stats combined I would agree with this assessment. I am pretty average I think. I have a much higher damage and a k/d approaching 2. K/d under 1 would be a concern.

I do get the feeling that played well BBs are OP at the moment. Trouble is statistically I think BB drivers are generally worse so the stats look ok. Meanwhile there have been plenty of games where I've dominated in a BB. I have a 61% WR with BBs and it can't just be luck (especially as my Myogi only had a 28% win rate pre patch!)

Myogi and Fuso is a fail division as the Myogi will count as a tier 6 battleship in MM. Kongo would just about have been acceptable but if you're dragged into a tier 8 match Myogi is just a liability. Reporting for that is a bit much though.

Yea if I'm feeling mean I'll report someone for name calling - which is what it is. Not that it seems to do much. I'll report for rudeness in general even if it's not profane. So just don't name call.

My PC plugs into my TV. If I don't want to read chat I just sit back a bit then it's too small to read. Or take my glasses off

Which stat are you all deciding marks op as poor player? Not win rate I hope.

Er why would you want to stop it happening? It's either useless or convertible for doubloons. It's not harming you.

Bad bad idea. Negative XP for being unlucky enough to be one shotted by a random salvo? This would just cause more negativity. They get nothing anyway. Don't hang it over to the next game. Perhaps the top loser and/or high caliber/confederate winners should get the X1.5 - but just the top player I would accept. Even if I came second top on losing team I wouldn't begrudge the other players X1,5. Many times I've come *way ahead* of anyone else as top loser.

Really? Less than 300 games isn't enough to use win rate as an indicator of skill. The rest of his stats aren't awful. And anyway there are a lot of "noobs" because the game is new. So most people are actually relatively new. Judging should be done on the players actions in game not on stats. Pretty sure you can't suggest a good game is luck based on stats. Maybe op is improving with time and experience!

I usually publicly apologise when I do this rather than bragging.

I like 3 - I would like to see missions later on where each team has a different role. Defender and attacker for example.

It's not fps. My medium spec PC can run the game smoothly on medium (not quite on high) The stops/skips happen when the ping shoots up from 30 to well over a hundred with "lag" coming on for a tiny amount of time. I don't know if it's the server or the Internet in general but it only happens sometimes. And it's annoying.