Admiral_noodle
-
Content Сount
6,337 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
4395 -
Clan
[ST-EU]
Everything posted by Admiral_noodle
-
Mainly because it has absolutely no AA i dont think ive ever met tier V in aurora either.
-
0.5.3 introducing mirror matchmaking?
Admiral_noodle replied to Capra76's topic in General Discussion
Lots of experienced players playing tiers 2 and 3 could be an awesome laugh as well -
Look forward to trying these changes out on PT tomorrow.
-
0.5.3 introducing mirror matchmaking?
Admiral_noodle replied to Capra76's topic in General Discussion
To be honest this isn't mirror MM but "common sense MM". Which is ok. For example - if there are 2 clevelands and 2 nurnbergs, MM will split then one of each for each team. Which is more sensible! -
Autoloss/Autowin by bad matchmaking - fix needed now.
Admiral_noodle replied to G01ngToxicCommand0's topic in General Discussion
Mirror in ranked would be OK, though it's usually pretty close anyway. Mirror in random would be a significant step to making me not play. For one it would increase wait times and secondly I'd find it boring. The CV mirror is already bad enough (but probably required especially at high tiers). Tighter MM restrictions at high tiers might be ok, but isn't the real problem the OP nature of Yamato and Zao... -
QQ on the mod - does it show overall rating? Rating over last X days? Rating for specific ship? Probably been explained but I can't find it
-
Autoloss/Autowin by bad matchmaking - fix needed now.
Admiral_noodle replied to G01ngToxicCommand0's topic in General Discussion
In still in the "not really" camp. I like variety and challenge. I'm not bothered with 2v5 DDs for example, that's doable. But things like Kolberg in a tier V match - frustrating. Perhaps ship tier MM needs relooking at. Even a per ship tier MM. -
Autoloss/Autowin by bad matchmaking - fix needed now.
Admiral_noodle replied to G01ngToxicCommand0's topic in General Discussion
You could also try team work. But seriously while I've seen some - interesting - MM I've never thought "this is an autowin/loss". If you have no DDs in domination and the enemy has lots, you need to defend the caps and focus DDs first. In fact I've had this very game and by killing DDs we got a healthy ship lead and capped later to win. The only issue I have with some MM games is finding myself an irrelevance. Like St. Louis on ocean in a tier V game. Or New Orleans - in any game -
Stats are useful though. Without them I wouldn't have known how badly I sucked and that I could be better. I'd like people to be able to see and share their own stats *if the want to*
-
I don't think the ability of a ship or captain was available to "real life" warships. So I'm not keen on the idea anyway. Half the fun is "realising" in game that your opponent is in fact a bad aim, or ignoring you when he shouldn't. Why should players have access to this kind of information? Maybe in "competitive tournament mode". Maybe for ranked. But not for random battles. Allies you might know about, but then the problem is toxicity/blame etc. You should be *helping* weaker players not shouting at them. So that's disastrous too.
-
Well I have 164 from a possible 179. Hoping by end of today all I won't have is the DD and cv missions. Then it's wait till reset. Oddly though the website in my phone shows the bar almost to the 5m mark, it says 3.4m today. Something is wrong with that site
-
No one should care what *other people* think about their stats, unless it's constructive criticism meant to help. The stats should be there for people to improve their gameplay by understanding how they are doing.
-
4 New Ships w/ Stats : Patch 0.5.2.3
Admiral_noodle replied to ShipComrade's topic in General Discussion
I'm terrible in DDs so a low tier premium DD might help me out -
After reading this you ll never think same about IJN Katori and BB Iowa
Admiral_noodle replied to D7v's topic in General Discussion
Still it shows that insta-nuking cruisers shouldn't happen all the time. 5 salvoes for a tier 9 BB to sink a tier 3 cruiser... -
I quite like it as alive as it is. I don't think I want a load of WoT players coming over to complain about how their ships aren't like tanks... but clan wars would be good and I hope to see them. In time. as for "taking a break till new content" - if your bored then sure that makes sense! I've not got anywhere near unlocking it all yet. Probably because I enjoy playing the ships I already have too much
-
Where's my ARP Kongo?? Sorry wrong thread(s)
-
I have 15 years in IT systems. What's your point? Sure you *could* put bots - with a totally different AI to the ones in PvE into ranked. Sure you could write the complicated code to make them "pretend" to be real players... ...but why on earth would WG do that? Show me a compelling reason. Better still, show me a business case...
-
How to earn massive XP! ;)
Admiral_noodle replied to Trigger_Happy_Dad's topic in General Discussion
This video should be mandatory for all low tier DD players.- 10 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- Cap
- Defend Cap
- (and 1 more)
-
[question about upgrade] Main battery modification 2
Admiral_noodle replied to WarJagger's topic in General Discussion
Slower reload faster turret traverse. Because it's 15% to rotation *speed* I actually have it on Warspite. Having guns loaded is no good if the turret won't track. -
The number on my phone isn't the same as the number on the website.
-
4 New Ships w/ Stats : Patch 0.5.2.3
Admiral_noodle replied to ShipComrade's topic in General Discussion
Maybe they will be in the tech tree and not in bundles -
WG you maniacs! Damn you MM! Damn you all to hell!! That kinda thing?
-
Me too. How sad am I?
-
I think team battles and ranked battles will run consecutively not concurrently. I would much prefer team to ranked. Given I have friends I can rope into playing (and for whom the extra team mode will entice them to play more)
-
That will depend on weekly missions not changing and the exact time 10m is reached though.