Admiral_noodle
-
Content Сount
6,337 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
4395 -
Clan
[ST-EU]
Everything posted by Admiral_noodle
-
V ARP Kongo - can I change it, its not what I tought I would get at all!
Admiral_noodle replied to Naveey's topic in General Discussion
It was a mission to get an anime Kongo. So I don't know why you're surprised! -
Virgin Media customers please read.
Admiral_noodle replied to Antony1953's topic in General Discussion
Virgin here. 150Mb with no issues. Are you on a package which limits your download speed? -
So I skipped some pages and this went from "where is RN" to "what would have happened in WWII". Weird! I don't mind what nations when just as long as there is more content soon and RN come eventually. So many RN ships to pick from I'd suggest separate CL CA battle cruiser and bb lines for them. It might mean later is better (less rework).
-
WN8/WTR in WoWs? **** No! Except...
Admiral_noodle replied to Spectrrra's topic in General Discussion
So anyone *not hiding* their stats is an epeen merchant. But people who hide their stats are Unicums or terribad (so ppl say). Im not hiding mine because if I want to compare how I'm doing to other people so I can recognise where I'm rubbish and improve. Now if this cake as standard in the game (personal stats page where it shows you how you're doing vs. Server averages) then yeah i would be fine not seeing anyone's stats but my own. Someone being better or worse than me isn't relevant. Being as good as I can be and "better than yesterday" is. -
WN8/WTR in WoWs? **** No! Except...
Admiral_noodle replied to Spectrrra's topic in General Discussion
WTR is based on your performance vs the average. So I like it as a "marker" of how you are doing "relative thievery one else". I like being able to see where I'm good and where I'm not. Eg I have like an average dmg of >60k and a WR of 80% in imperator. So I thought I was just brilliant in her. Turns out my rating is only 1400 or "great" (not purple Unicums) in that ship, telling me I'm not all that good, the ship is OP I don't what the WTR stats in the game display though. -
Everything works fine generally for me and my friends. However. The following is annoying the **** out of me. Carousel keeps resetting after every game/whenever it feels like. Please fix Thank you.
-
Have to agree with Dom. Team has total control over its own team composition. Take the most powerful team you can! Complaining about "MM" when there basically isn't one is odd. I like cv vs no cv sometimes. Gives my AA spec NO something to do.
-
It's much better for me on my big screen Why you can't have it resize able is beyond me.
-
Please no. Sometimes I nip on for one game when I have 20 mins to spare. Like before work. If the game could go even longer if have to suicide not to be late. 25 minutes is also a long time. If both sides have ships left well,.. Should have got stuck in earlier.
-
This the size increase on the UI in game? I like it. But I play on a massive TV
-
I've gone BFT, EM, last stand and Demolitions on Murmansk. BFT is still useful as at that tier AA is going to be needed. EM is still needed to allow guns to track while dodging. Every little helps. AFT is pointless on Murmansk now. Not that I was much good at hitting at that range maybe I'll actually torpedo now Demolitions is going to be fun I think
-
Well the game immediately crashed on opening. It seems ok now - I'm giving it a rattle test.
-
I expect it should update with me find as I've never run any mods ever. That's what I'm hoping anyway!
-
Is this the first time WG have nerfed something and everyone has agreed??
-
Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)
Admiral_noodle replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion
I want to play with everyone. Good and "bad" (though only bad players who are willing to learn preferably) i wouldbt want to be "bracketed" into a skill pool. It would be nice to have even numbers of good and bad each side, though that seems difficult.- 306 replies
-
- 2
-
-
- wows-stats
- XVM
- (and 3 more)
-
Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)
Admiral_noodle replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion
I had a game in Iowa against 3 Yamatos. No way we're we going to win. But they had an Iowa with a cruiser the other side of that map. So I went and fought him and sunk the Iowa and the cruiser. We lost and the Yamatos got me. With premium I just about made 9k credits. If I'd given up if have made a stonking loss. It's always better to go down fighting than rage quit. That's why I don't understand raging when people think "auto loss". Try harder. Play your best. At least you'll make more credits and not lose money.- 306 replies
-
- 4
-
-
- wows-stats
- XVM
- (and 3 more)
-
Trying to rationalize: Played well but still lost 11 out of 13 games...
Admiral_noodle replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
And given your stats you ought to notice -
Proposal to Wargaming: A premium carrier
Admiral_noodle replied to Varian_Dorn's topic in General Discussion
The money making potential of USS Enterprise would be huge. It's an iconic ship. Now really no one should by a premium T8 unless they actually know how to play it. Of course it occurs to me WG could do something to appease all sides Enterprise - £40 in a bundle! But when you unlock a normal tier 8 CV you can get it naked in the tech tree for half that. at least if you saw a proper n00b on your team failing in it you could be satisfied they paid an extortionate price for it. -
You pay to set up a team. So that people don't set up millions. Each.
-
Secondary Shell Hits Banner/Ribbon
Admiral_noodle replied to Brokenstar's topic in General Discussion
Agree. An indication of how your secondaries are doing would indeed be nice -
0.5.3 is coming. Public Test confirms WGs changes.
Admiral_noodle replied to Admiral_H_Nelson's topic in General Discussion
A cunning plan. i already have last stand and DE earmarked for my Murmansk... i also think predictions of what will happen will not survive first contact with the wider community -
Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)
Admiral_noodle replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion
I don't like the idea of people judging me on previous games. I want people to judge me on my actions in the current game. I'm very uncomfortable with the idea of "bad players" not getting support or being listened to while people remove their own judgement and let a mod replace it. I can see both sides, but overall I feel if everyone had xvm the game world be less fun. And I'd prefer not to know my team were awful at the start. It's bad enough with bad MM as it is- 306 replies
-
- 3
-
-
- wows-stats
- XVM
- (and 3 more)
-
Trying to rationalize: Played well but still lost 11 out of 13 games...
Admiral_noodle replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
Warships.today has them Regarding games being "rigged" in any way to help worse players. I'm too lazy to start a debate too. However, it doesn't seem to be affecting WR of Unicums anyway so the point of this thread (why do I keep losing) is not addressed by suggestions of fixing. Other people achieve great results. Therefore it's possible to be good. -
0.5.3 is coming. Public Test confirms WGs changes.
Admiral_noodle replied to Admiral_H_Nelson's topic in General Discussion
Overall I like the skill changes. Well I don't dislike them. They might be interesting. I really like team battles The next update needs to be new content though. More trees are now needed. -
Sink the wows-stats (XVM for warships)
Admiral_noodle replied to MADcompany's topic in General Discussion
Hmm. So if I get Iowa, detonated first salvo in first game I'm red? So in the next game I'm treated like scum? Not given support? So I have another poor game... Pretty soon I'll be quitting.