Takru

Jup, Fehler von mir. Aber... dennoch könnte die D11 als Premium DD für die Briten kommen, dann eben als Hightier

Jup. But it could also be the Daring class ship making it into the game as a high tier DD.

Die Verbesserung der Flugabwehr soll unter anderem auch das frühzeitige Ausschalten der gegnerischen Träger vermindern, daher die Anhebung des Schades bei markierten Zielen vom 10% auf 30% mit dem kommenden Patch. Hatte heute Vormittag erst ein Spiel in dem ich mit der Essex und einer Lexington auf meiner Seite beide gegnerischen Träger (Essex + Shokaku) im ersten Anlauf ausgeschaltet haben. Damit war das Spiel dann für das gegnerische Team gelaufen.

Siehe hier: http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/47272-infos-aus-dem-ru-forum-aus-dem-englischen-uebersetzt/ Hat aufgrund der Menge etwas gedauert.

Erstmal abwarten wie sich Radar auswirkt.

Considering the issues with Torpwalls, no. Just no. Hell, no.

Well they do know that kind of stuff is getting around, let's hope they're just trolling What would premium ammo do anyway? +50 / 75% / 100% accuracy?

Great! Improved Interface! Can't wait to see what it's like. The current one certainly ... has a lot of room for improvement.

Let's wait and see how Radar affects the gameplay. May be we'll have more news about the whole DD meta matter in a month or so.

Clear skies... if only there was more information on how many planes are there in a single battle... I mean, you have a rough idea of much you need to do for most other awards, but clear skies? Nevermind that you sometimes depend on the CA and BBs to launch their planes in the first place...

Will translate to German when I'm home, might take a few hours, though.

And... erm... another question... how are XP and credits awarded in general? Is there an algorithm for it which also takes into account diminishing returns , i.e. you get lots of points for doing like 30k damage and less for the following damage etc? Or is there a total pool of credits / XP which is divided up between the players according to the points they gained through the course of a battle with their actions, i.e. enemy team has X amount of total HP, you did Y damage compared to their total so you get Z credits / XP?

Any idea what he might have in mind? Changing their stats as in... trade better guns for worse Camo / longer Torp reload time for example?

One question guys... is capping rewarded differently for different classes? When I cap with cruiser, I seem to get more XP / credits at the end of a battle. May be my imagination, but coming close to 500k credits net was ... surprising. And I didn't do too much in that game but capped two bases....

Why are you feeding the troll?

Well, absolutely not thanks to me I'm afraid. I did little other than eating torps and bombs from the other carriers :-/

Damn, I thought my cunningly chose nickname there would hide my true identitiy better.

When people have a lot of knowledge of something, it often appears easier to them to use analogies to describe the issues instead of telling you about the issues straightforward.

Finally an implementation of sea mines Wargaming will approve.

Point being that I made an effort to get you to look at the numbers, really hard. Point being that you are more comfortable clinging to your opinion than to try and validate it. There is really 0 merit in your accusiations and unlike in a theological discussion, you could validate it all by yourself. But you don't want to, instead you prefer to complain about non-existing issues with the matchmaker.

Unfortunately, Wargaming mathematicians have yet to break the barrier above a rating of 100.

Obviously it has nothing to do with those bad players being bad players who are more of a burden to their team than a threat to the others?

You know, it would be "nice" if you even read what I wrote.... On the other hand, you may as well continue to complain instead of trying to improve your gameplay so you win more often. If you're looking for someone to blame for your "unlucky" streaks, have a look at the mirror before going out and making up theories about discriminating MM.

MM is meant to provide interesting and somewhat balanced matches. Hence the restrictions of +/- 2 tiers max. If you end up repeatedly as low tier in a game with the same ship, you'll be guaranteed top tier after 4 (IIRC) such battles. Obviously it would be "easier" if we had full mirror matchmaking for all classes, but would it make battles more interesting? Not for me.

May be you can explain? I already asked you to look at the stats of the people you play with and against. Did you do that? Nevermind that your own screenshot proves that your theory is not valid as you did win in the Admiral Hipper, despite your claim that once you're on the downward slope, you'll stay there. Your picture also does not tell us how much you did to contribute to any of these battles. Again, I see why it is easy to come up with a conspriacy, but you've not brought any proof of that ... Then again, most conspiracy theoricians feel that the lack of proof for their theories is proof enough. Also, you can quite clearly see that Skybuck himself proves that your theory is not true. Have a look at his signature. Usual winrate about 48%, which slowly improved to almost 60% within the last 24hrs with 27 battles played. Nevermind that he got 40% more Xp than his average and twice as much damage as his average. I'd interpret this as him improving his skills as a player, hence his increase in average XP. If you were right, given his previous below 50% winratio, he'd be on the downward spiral as well, but he apparently isn't. He learned a thing or two during his 2000+ games and now makes use of that. He's making his weight felt more and more in every battle, so his win ratio climbs up, his average damage and average XP increase as well.